Self-etching adhesives improve the shear bond strength of a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement to dentin

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 55-59

  Besnault, Catherine ^a   Attal, Jean Pierre ^a   Ruse, Dorin ^b   Degrange, Michel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^b Faculty of Dental Surgery   (Canada)

Author keywords

Resin modified glass ionomer cements; Self etching adhesives; Shear bond strength

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE AGENT; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; GLASS IONOMER; POLITEF;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTIN; DENTISTRY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; SHEAR STRESS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TENSILE STRENGTH;

ACRYLIC RESINS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPOMERS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTIN; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; RESIN CEMENTS; RESINS, SYNTHETIC; SHEAR STRENGTH;

EID: 1942531572     PISSN: 14615185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Antonucci JM, Mac Kinney JE, Stansbury JW. Formulation and evaluation of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements. Trans. 13th Annual Meeting, New York, Soc for Biomater, 1987.
2. Antonucci JM, Mc Kinney JE, Stansbury JW. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements. US Patent Application. No. 160856, 1988.
3. Barkmeier WW, Los SA, Triolo PT. Bond strengths and SEM evaluation of Clearfil Liner Bond 2. Am J Dent 1995;8:298-293.
4. Besnault C, Attal JP. Influence of a simulated oral environment on microleakage of direct composite resin and sandwich restorations in Class II cavities. Am J Dent 2001;14:367-372.
5. Bouillaguet S, Gysi P, Wataha JC, Ciucchi B, Cattani M, Godin C, Meyer JM. Bond strength of composite to dentin using conventional, one-step, and self-etching adhesive systems. J Dent 2001;29:55-61.
6. Burgess J, Norling B, Summitt J. Resin ionomer restorative materials: the new generation. J Esthet Dent 1994;6:207-215.
7. Charlton DG, Havemann CW. Dentin surface treatment and bond strength of class ionomers. Am J Dent 1994;7:47-49.
8. Cho E., Kopel H, White SN. Moisture susceptibility of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials. Quintessence Int 1995;26:351-358.
9. Cognard J. Cleavage and static toughness. J Adhesion 1996;57:31-43.
10. Davidson CL, Abdalla AI. Effect of thermal and mechanical load cycling on the marginal integrity of Class II resin composite restorations. Am J Dent 1993;6:39-42.
11. Dietrich T, Lösche AC, Lösche GM, Roulet JF. Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restorations in Class II cavities with cervical margins in dentin. J Dent 1999;27:119-128.
12. Ferrari M, Davidson CL. Sealing capacity of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and resin composite placed in vivo in Class 5 restorations. Oper Dent 1996;21:69-72.
13. Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Petschelt A. Technique sensitivity of dentin bonding: effect of application mistakes on bond strength and marginal adaptation. Oper Dent 2000;25:324-330.
14. Friedl KH, Powers JM, Hiller KA. Influence of different factors on bond strength of hybrid ionomers. Oper Dent 1995;20:74-80.
15. Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Hiller KA, Mortazavi F. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid ionomer/composite sandwich restorations. Oper Dent 1997;22:21-29.
16. Fritz UB, Finger WJ. Bonding efficiency of single-bottle enamel/dentin adhesives. Am J Dent 1999;12:277-282.
17. Fruits TJ, Coury TL, Miranda FJ, Duncanson MG Jr. Uses and properties of current glass ionomer cements: a review. Gen Dent 1996;44:410-418.
18. Gallo JR, Comeaux R, Haines B, Xu X, Burgess JO. Shear bond strength of four filled dentin bonding systems. Oper Dent 2001;26:44-47.
19. Gordan VV, Vargas MA, Cobb DS, Denehy GE. Evaluation of adhesive systems using acidic primers. Am J Dent 1997;10:219-223.
20. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:658-664.
21. Lake GJ, Thomas AG. The strength of lightly elastic materials. Proc Royal Soc London 1967;A300:108-109.
22. Mitra SB. Photocurable ionomer cement systems. European Patent Application No 0 323 120 A2, 1989.
23. Mitra SB. Adhesion to dentin and physical properties of a light-cured glass-ionomer liner/base. J Dent Res 1991;70:72-74.
24. Miyazaki M, Iwasaki K, Onose M, Moore BK. Resin-modified glass-ionomers: effect of dentin primer application on the development of bond strength. Eur J Oral Sci 1999;107:393-399.
25. Miyazaki M, Onose H, Moore BK. Effect of operator variability on dentin bond strength of two-step bonding systems. Am J Dent 2000;13:101-104.
26. Mjör IA. The location of clinically diagnosed secondary caries. Quintessence Int 1998;29:313-317.
27. Mongolnam P, Tyas MT. Light-cured lining materials: a laboratory study. Dent Mater 1994;10:196-202.
28. Nakanuma K, Hayakawa T, Tomita T, Yamazaki M. Effect of the application of dentin primers and a dentin bonding agent on the adhesion between the resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and dentin. Dent Mater 1998;14: 281-286.
29. Opdam NJ, Roeters JJ, Burgersdijk RC. Microleakage of Class II box-type composite restorations. Am J Dent 1998;11:160-164.
30. Opdam NJ, Roeters JJ, Kuijs R, Buergersdijk RC. Necessity of bevels for box only Class II composite restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80: 274-279.
31. Pashley EL, Kelli AA, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Effects of one versus two applications of an unfilled, all-in-one adhesive on dentine bonding. J Dent 2002; 30:83-90.
32. Pereira PNR, Yamada T, Inokoshi S, Burrow MF, Sano H, Tagami J. Adhesion of resin-modified glass ionomer cements using resin bonding systems. J Dent 1998;26:479-485.
33. Peutzfeldt A. Compomers and glass ionomers: bond strength to dentin and mechanical properties. Am J Dent 1996;9:259-263.
34. Prati C, Montanari G, Biagini G, Fava F, Pashley DH. Effects of dentin surface treatments on the shear bond strength of Vitrabond. Dent Mater 1992;8: 21-26.
35. Terata R, Nakashima K, Yoshinaka S, Kubota M. Effect of dentin treatment with citric acid/ferric chloride solutions on glass ionomer bond strength. Am J Dent 1998;11:33-35.
36. Um CM, Oilo G. The effect of early water contact on glass-ionomer cements. Quintessence Int 1992;23:209-214.
37. Unemori M, Matsuya Y, Akashi A, Goto Y, Akamine A. Composite resin restoration and post-operative sensibility - clinical follow-up in an undergraduate program. J Dent 2001;29:7-13.
38. Uno S, Finger WJ, Fritz U. Long-term mechanical characteristics of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials. Dent Mater 1996;12: 64-69.
39. van Dijken JW, Kieri C, Carlen M. Longevity of extensive Class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement. J Dent Res 1999;78:1319-1325.
40. van Noort R, Cardew GE, Howard IC, Noroozi, S. The effect of local interfacial geometry on the measurement of the tensile bond strength to dentin. J Dent Res 1991;70:889-893.
41. Wilson AD. Resin-modified glass-ionomer cements. Int J Prosthodont 1990;3:425-429.