Distributed generation: Remote power systems with advanced storage technologies

Energy Policy

Volumn 32, Issue 14, 2004, Pages 1573-1589

  Clark, Woodrow ^a   Isherwood, William ^b  

^a Governors Office of Planning/Res   (United States)

^b LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Advanced technologies; Distributed generation energy; Environmentally sound technologies; Optimization and economic models; Remote communities

Indexed keywords

DAMS; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ELECTRIC ENERGY STORAGE; ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS; FINANCE; WIND POWER;

COAL POWER PLANTS; DISTRIBUTED GENERATION (DG); REMOTE POWER SYSTEMS; WIND FARMS;

ENERGY POLICY;

ELECTRICITY SUPPLY; POWER GENERATION; STORAGE; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 1942531416     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00017-X     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. ARECA, 1996. Affordable Power in Rural Alaska. ARECA Rural Issues Forum Report, Alaska Rural Electricity Cooperative Association, Anchorage, AK.
2. AVEC, 1996. 1995 Annual Report. Alaskan Village Electric Cooperative, Inc., Anchorage, AK.
3. Baring-Gould, E.I., 1996. HYBRID2, The Hybrid System Simulation Model, Version 1.0 User Manual. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Report NREL/TP-440-21272, Golden, CO.
4. Beguelin, A., Dongarra, J., Geist, A., Manchek, R., Sunderam, V., 1991. Users Guide to PVM: Parallel Virtual Machine. ORNL/TM-11826, Mathematical Sciences Section, Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
5. Bolinger, M., Wiser, R., 2000a. Quantifying the value that wind power provides as a hedge against volatile natural gas prices. American Wind Energy Association, Portland, OR.
6. Bolinger, V., Wise, R., 2000b. Customer-sited PVs: A Survey of Clean Energy Fund Support. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, pp. 1-16.
7. Brown, C., Guichard, A., Lyons, D., 1996. Wind energy in polar regions: Casey Station Antarctica. Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the Canadian Wind Energy Association, Kananaskis, Canada.
8. California Consumer Affairs Agency (CAA), 2001a. Flex Your Power Programs. Sacramento, CA, April.
9. California Consumer Affairs Agency (CAA), 2001b. Building Better Buildings: A Blueprint for Sustainable State Facilities. Sustainable Building Task Force and the State of Consumer Services Agency, December: http://www.ciwmb.ca.gov/GreenBuilding/Blueprint/Blueprint.pdf
10. California Consumer Power and Conservation Financing Authority (CPA), 2002. PULSE Program, June: http://www.capowerauthority.ca.gov/ financing/PULSE.htm
11. California Energy Commission (CEC), 2002a. Draft Strategic Plan for Distributed Generation. Sacramento, CA. Feb 20, 02, pp. 1-5.
12. California Energy Commission (CEC), 2002b. Buy down programs for on-site generation. Sacramento, CA. http://www.energy.ca.gov/ greengrid/index.html
13. California Energy Commissin (CEC), 2003. Distributed Generation Strategic Plan (Final Report), January. Electronic version at http://www.energy.ca.gov/distgen/strategic/strategic_plan.html
14. California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) 1999. Definition of Distributed Generation. Decision #99-10-065, September.
15. California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), 2002. Rebate program for on-site power generation. San Francisco, CA: jhgγpuc.ca.gov
16. California Stationary Fuel Cell Collaborative (CSFCC), 2002. Governor's Office of Research and Planning; California Air Resources Board and the University of California, Irvine. National Center for Fuel Cells, Sacramento, CA: www.stationaryfuelcells.org
17. Chapman, R.N., 1996. Hybrid Power Technology for Remote Military Facilities. Power Quality Solutions/Alternative Energy Proceedings, IEEE Annual Meeting, September, pp. 415-427.
18. Clark, W.W., 1996. A technology commercialization model. Journal of Technology Transfer. Washington, DC.
19. Clark, W.W., 1997. Publicly Funded Research and Development in Environmentally Sound Technologies: The Case of the US. Report for United Nations (one of ten industrialized countries). New York, NY and Geneva.
20. Clark, W.W., 2000. Developing and diffusing clean technologies: Experience and practical issues. OECD Conference. Seoul, Korea.
21. Clark, W.W., 2001. The California Energy Challenge: From crisis to opportunity for sustainable development. American Western Economic Conference, San Francisco, CA, June.
22. Clark, W.W., 2002 Science parks (2): The practice. International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialization. Interscience Press, London, UK.
23. Clark, W.W., Bradshaw, T., 2004. Agile Energy Systems in Complex Societies: The Case of the California Energy Crisis. Elsevier Press, London, UK (in press).
24. Clark, W.W., Jensen, J.D., 1994. The IO Fund: international alliances for developing SMEs. Paper on the Danish Government Fund for business development in transitional economies.
25. Clark, W.W., Jensen, J.D., 2001. The role of government in privatization: An economic model for Denmark. International Journal of Technology Management 21(5/6).
26. Clark, W.W., Lund, H., 2001. Civic markets: The case of the California Energy crisis. International Journal of Global Energy Issues. Interscience, London, UK.
27. Clark, W.W., Paolucci, E., 1997. The development of environmental technologies for automotive industry: Issues for a new model of innovation. Journal of International Product Development Management.
28. Clark, W.W., Sowell, A., 2002. Standard Practices Manual: Life cycle analysis for project/program finance. International Journal of Revenue Management. Interscience Press, London, UK.
29. Cooper, J.F., Fleming, D., Hargrove, D., Koopman, R., Peterman, K., 1995. A refuelable zinc/air battery for fleet electric vehicle propulsion. SAE Paper 951948.
30. Drucker, P., 1993. Post-Capitalist Society. Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., Oxford, UK.
31. The Economist, 1997. Science and Technology Section: "At last, the fuel cell". October 25, London, UK, pp. 89-92.
32. Energy Information Administration, 1997. Annual Energy Outlook 1998. Advance copy available on the Internet at http://www.eia.doe.gov
33. Energy Mines and Resources Canada, 1988. Small power production in remote communities: A shared opportunity. Energy Mines and Resources Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
34. Flowers, L., 1997. Renewables for sustainable village power. Proceedings of the International Conference of Village Electrification through Renewable Energy, New Delhi, India. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Report NREL/CP-440-22608, Golden, CO.
35. Galambos J.D. Perkins L.J. Haney S.W. Mandrekas J. Commercial Tokamak reactor potential with advanced Tokamak operation Nuclear Fusion 35 1995 551
36. Guichard, A., 1994. Towards new energy systems for Antarctic Stations, Proceedings of the Sixth Symposium on Antarctic Logistics and Operations, Rome, Italy, pp. 81-95.
37. Granovetter M. Problems of explanation in economic sociology Nohria N. Eccles R.G. Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action 1992 25-56 Harvard Business School Press Boston
38. Granovetter M. Business groups Smelser N.J. Swedberg R. The Handbook of Economic Sociology 1994 453-475 Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ
39. Harris, R.E., Lyons, J.G., Rinehart, P., 1997. Remote monitoring and control of electric power systems to decrease costs and improve system performance in remote arctic locations. Unpublished paper prepared for AVEC, Anchorage, AK.
40. Isherwood, W., Smith, J.R., Aceves, S., Berry, G., Clark, W.W., Johnson, R., Das, D., Goering, D., Seifert, R., 2000. Remote Village Energy Systems of Advanced Technologies. University of California, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, UCRL-ID-129289, January 1998 (to be published in Energy Policy, Fall).
41. Jensen, H., 1997. Personal Communication, Igiugig Electric Utility. Anchorage, AK.
42. Jones C. Careers in project networks: The case of the film industry Arthur M. Rousseau D. The Boundaryless Career 1996 58-75 Oxford University Press New York, NY
43. Jones, C., Hesterly, W.S., Borgatti, S.P., 1997. A general theory of network governance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Academy of Management Review 22 (4).
44. Koniag, Inc., 1995. Native Alaska Energy Efficiency Feasibility Study. US Department of Energy Report, Prepared under Grant No. DE-FG51-94R020502.
45. Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP), 2002. Rebate programs. Los Angeles, CA. ghonleλadwp.com
46. Lund H. Choice awareness: The development of technological and institutional choice in the public debate of Danish energy planning Journal of Environmental Policy Planning 2 2000 249-259
47. Lund, H., 2001, Flexible Energy System Data in Denmark. Draft report for Danish Energy Ministry.
48. Malosh, J.B., Johnson, R., Bubendorf, S., 1985, Part-Load Economy of Diesel-Electric Generators. Final Report, State of Alaska, Department of Transportation and Public Facilities, Division of Planning, Fairbanks, AK.
49. Manwell, J.F., Rogers, A., Hayman, G., Avelar, C.T., McGowan, J.G., 1996. Theory Manual for Hybrid2, The Hybrid System Simulation Model, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Report NREL/TP-440-21182, Golden, CO.
50. Moore, T., 1997. Market potential high for fuel cells. EPRI Journal, May-June, 6-17.
51. Münster, E., 2001. Combined neat and power: Nord pool exchange. PlanEnergi, Denmark, 2 June. nordπlanenergi.dk
52. Narin, F., Hamilton, K.S., Olivastro, D., 1998. The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science. Research Policy, 1-17.
53. National Science Foundation, 1997. Science and Engineering Indicators. Appendix A: pp. 136-139, 150-153, 172-175.
54. Perkins, J., Lamont, A., Clark, W.W., 1997. Global Sustainability though SUPERCODE Optimization and Meta Net Economic Equilibrium Codes, LLNL, LDRD Project Proposal and Report.
55. Porter, M.E., van der Linde, C., 1995. Green and competitive. Harvard Business Review, September-October, 120-134.
56. Saxenian A. Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 1994 Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA
57. Saxenian A. Local and Global Networks of Immigrant Professionals in Silicon Valley 2002 Public Policy Institute of California San Francisco, CA
58. Smith, J.R., Aceves, S., Clark, W., John Perkins, L., (LLNL); Gehl, S., Maulbetsch, J (EPRI); Nakata Nakata, T. (Toakai University of Japan, 1997). Optimization for Power/Utility Applications. Proposal at LLNL for LDRD 1998.
59. United Nations, 1994. Report of the Workshop (Oslo, 13-15 October, 1993) on the Transfer and Development of Environmentally Sound Technologies (ESTs). UNCTAD, New York and Geneva, pp. 1-51.
60. United Nations, 1997. Promoting the transfer and use of environmentally sound technology: A review of policies. Science and Technology Issues, UNCTAD, New York, Geneva, pp. 1-53.
61. US Department of Commerce, 1997. The Global Context for US Technology Policy. Washington, DC.
62. Williamson O.E. Transaction cost economics and organization theory Smelser N.J. Swedberg R. The Handbook of Economic Sociology 1994 77-107 Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press
63. Williamson O.E. Economic organization: The case of candor Academy of Management Review 21 1996 48-57