Efficacy of wing versus delta traps for predicting infestation levels of four generations of the nantucket pine tip moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in the southern United States

Environmental Entomology

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 397-404

  Asaro, Christopher ^a   Cameron, R Scott ^a,b   Nowak, John T ^a,c   Grosman, Donald M ^a,d   Seckinger, Jimmy O ^a,b   Berisford, C Wayne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b INTERNATIONAL PAPER   (United States)

^c USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^d Texas Forest Service   (United States)

Author keywords

Damage prediction; Pheromone traps; Pinus taeda; Rhyacionia frustrana

Indexed keywords

CROP PEST; FOREST MANAGEMENT; MONITORING; PEST DAMAGE; PHEROMONE TRAP;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

LEPIDOPTERA; PINUS TAEDA; RHYACIONIA FRUSTRANA; TORTRICIDAE;

EID: 1942473132     PISSN: 0046225X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1603/0046-225X-33.2.397     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Asaro, C., and C. W. Berisford. 2001a. Predicting infestation levels of the Nantucket pine tip moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) using pheromone traps. Environ. Entomol. 30: 776-784.
2. Asaro, C., and C. W. Berisford. 2001b. Seasonal changes in adult longevity and pupal weight of the Nantucket pine tip moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) with implications for interpreting pheromone trap catch. Environ. Entomol. 30: 999-1005.
3. Asaro, C., M. J. Dalusky, and C. W. Berisford. 2001. Quantity and ratio of pheromone components among multiple generations of the Nantucket pine tip moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in Georgia and Virginia. Environ. Entomol. 30: 1006-1011.
4. Asaro, C., C. J. Fettig, K. W. McCravy, J. T. Nowak, and C. W. Berisford. 2003. The Nantucket pine tip moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae): A literature review with management implications. J. Entomol. Sci. 38: 1-40.
5. Berisford, C. W. 1974. Comparisons of emergence periods and generations of pine tip moths, Rhyacionia frustrana and R. rigidana. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 67: 666-668.
6. Berisford, C. W. 1988. The Nantucket pine tip moth, pp. 141-161. In A. A. Berryman (ed.), Dynamics of forest insect populations: patterns, causes, implications. Plenum Publishing, New York.
7. Berisford, C. W., and H. M. Kulman. 1967. Infestation rate and damage by the Nantucket pine tip moth in six loblolly pine stand categories. For. Sci. 13: 428-438.
8. Berisford, C. W., P. M. Gargiullo, and C. G. Canalos. 1984. Optimum timing for insecticidal control of the Nantucket pine tip moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 77: 174-177.
9. Canalos, C. G., and C. W. Berisford. 1981. Seasonal activity of two sympatric Rhyacionia species determined by pheromone traps. J. Georgia Entomol. Soc. 16: 219-222.
10. Debarr, G. L., J. W. Brewer, R. S. Cameron, and C. W. Berisford. 2002. Nantucket pine tip moth, Rhyacionia frustrana, lures and traps: what is the optimum combination?, pp. 56-68. In C. W. Berisford and D. M. Grosman (eds.), The Nantucket pine tip moth: old problems, new research. Proceedings of an informal conference, The Entomological Society of America, Annual Meeting, December 12-16 1999, Atlanta, GA.
11. Fettig, C. J., M. J. Dalusky, and C. W. Berisford. 2000a. Nantucket pine tip moth phenology and timing of insecticide spray applications in seven southeastern states, U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Res. Pap. SRS-18.
12. Fettig, C. J., K. W. McCravy, and C. W. Berisford. 2000b. Effects of Nantucket pine tip moth insecticide spray schedules on loblolly pine seedlings. South. J. Appl. For. 24: 106-111.
13. Fettig, C. J., J. T. Nowak, D.M. Grosman, and C. W. Berisford. 2003. Nantucket pine tip moth phenology and timing of insecticide spray applications in the Western Gulf region. U.S. Dep. Agric., For. Serv. Res. Pap. SRS-32.
14. Gargiullo, P. M., C. W. Berisford, C. G. Canalos, J. A. Richmond, and S. C. Cade. 1984. Mathematical descriptions of Rhyacionia frustrana (Comstock), and the pitch pine tip moth, Rhyacionia rigidana (Fernald) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) cumulative catches in pheromone traps, cumulative eggs hatching, and their use in timing of chemical control. Environ. Entomol. 12: 1391-1402.
15. Gargiullo, P. M., C. W. Berisford, and J. F. Godbee. 1985. Prediction of optimal timing for chemical control of the Nantucket pine tip moth, Rhyacionia frustrana (Comstock) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in the southeastern coastal plain. J. Econ. Entomol. 12: 81-90.
16. Hedden, R. L., and T. Clason. 1980. Nantucket pine tip moth impact on loblolly pine wood and product quality. Forestry Res. Rep. 1979, LSU Agric. Exp. Sta., N. Louisiana. Hill Farm Exp. Sta., Homer, LA.
17. Hertel, G. D., and D. M. Benjamin. 1977. Intensity of site preparation influences on pine webworm and tip moth infestations of pine seedlings in North-central Florida. Environ. Entomol. 6: 118-122.
18. Hill, A. S., C. W. Berisford, U. E. Brady, and W. L. Roelofs. 1981. Nantucket pine tip moth, Rhyacionia frustrana: identification of two sex pheromone components. J. Chem. Ecol. 7: 517-528.
19. Hood, W. M., R. L. Hedden, and C. W. Berisford. 1988. Hazard rating forest sites for pine tip moth, Rhyacionia spp., in the upper Piedmont plateau. For. Sci. 34: 1083-1093.
20. Nelson, L. R., and S. C. Cade. 1984. Integrated pest management in pine stands (0-5 years) - vegetation, pp. 72-87. In S. J. Branham and G. D. Hertel (eds.), Proceedings of the Integrated Forest Pest Management Symposium, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
21. Nowak, J. T., and C. W. Berisford. 2000. Effects of intensive forest management practices on insect infestation levels and loblolly pine growth. J. Econ. Entomol. 93: 336-341.
22. Nowak, J. T., T. B. Harrington, and C. W. Berisford. 2003. Nantucket pine tip moth development and population dynamics: influence of nitrogen fertilization and vegetation control. For. Sci. 49: 731-737.
23. Ross, D. W., C. W. Berisford, and J. F. Godbee, Jr. 1990. Pine tip moth, Rhyacionia spp., response to herbaceous vegetation control in an intensively site-prepared loblolly pine plantation. For. Sci. 36: 1105-1118.
24. Siry, J. P. 2002. Intensive timber management practices, pp. 299-325. In D. N. Wear and J. G. Greis (eds.), Southern forest resource assessment. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv., South. Res. Stn., Asheville, NC.
25. Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry, 3rd ed. Freeman, New York.
26. SPSS. 1997. Sigmastat: user's manual, version 2.0. SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL.
27. Thomas, H. A., T. Miller, and W. H. McNab. 1982. Pine tip moth damage in relation to site preparation and regeneration method for loblolly pine. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Res. Note SE-311.
28. Warren, L. O. 1964. Growth of pine trees protected from attack by Nantucket pine tip moth. Arkansas Farm Res. 13: 11.
29. Warren, L. O., G. W. Wallis, and J. D. Walstad. 1974. Nantucket pine tip moth infestations and parasite populations relative to site preparation of loblolly pine plantations. Univ. Arkansas Res. Rep. 4.
30. Yates, H. O. III, N. A. Overgaard, and T. W. Koerber. 1981. Nantucket pine tip moth. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv., For. Insect and Disease Leafl. No. 70.