Effects of intensive forest management practices on insect infestation levels and loblolly pine growth

Journal of Economic Entomology

Volumn 93, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 336-341

  Nowak, J T ^a   Berisford, C W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Dioryctria amatella; Intensive forestry; Pinus taeda; Rhyacionia frustrana

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; INSECT CONTROL; LOBLOLLY PINE; METHODOLOGY; MOTH;

ANIMALS; INSECT CONTROL; MOTHS; PINUS TAEDA;

EID: 0034167319     PISSN: 00220493     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1603/0022-0493-93.2.336     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Beal, R. H. 1967. Heavy tip moth attacks reduce early growth of loblolly and shortleaf pine. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Res. Notes SO-54.
2. Berisford, C. W. 1988. The Nantucket pine tip moth, pp. 141-161. In A. A. Berryman [ed.], Dynamics of forest insect populations. Plenum, New York.
3. Berisford, C. W., J. F. Godbee, Jr., and D. W. Ross. 1989. Impact of pine tip moth control, weed control, and fertilizer on growth and form of loblolly pine, pp. 130-136. In R. I Alfaro and S.G. Golver [eds.], Insects affecting reforestation: biology and damage. Proceedings, IUFRO Working Group, Insects Affecting Reforestation. Forestry Canada, Pacific Forestry Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
4. Berisford, C. W., C. G. Canalos, J. F. Godbee, Jr., and H. O. Yates III. 1992. Occurrence and seasonal activity of pine tip moths in Georgia. Ga. For. Comm. Ga. For. Res. Pap. 87.
5. Cade, S. C., and R. L. Hedden. 1987. Growth impact of pine tip moth on loblolly pine plantations in the Ouachita Mountains of Arkansas. South. J. Appl. For. 11: 128-133.
6. Carisey, N., P. Menassieu, P. Baradat, B. Lemoine, and J. Levieux. 1994. Sensitivity of Maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait) to attack by the pine moth, Dioryctria sylvestrella Ratz (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in a range of site conditions: Relationships to certain growth characteristics. Ann. Sci. For. 51: 67-75.
7. Clarke, S. R., G. L. DeBarr, and C. W. Berisford. 1990. Effects of fenvalerate and azinphosmethyl on scale insects and their natural enemies in loblolly pine seed orchards. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Res. Pap. SE-279.
8. Coulson, R. N., and R. T. Franklin. 1970. The biology of Dioryctria amatella (Lepidoptera: Phycitidae). Can. Entomol. 102: 679-684.
9. Creighton, J. L., B. R. Zutter, G. R. Glover, and D. H. Gjerstad. 1987. Planted pine growth response to herbaceous vegetation control, treatment duration, and herbicide application technique. South. J. Appl. For. 11: 223-227.
10. Ebel, B. H., T. H. Flavell, L. E. Drake, H. O. Yates III, and G. L. DeBarr. 1975. Seed and cone insects of southern pines. U.S. For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-8.
11. Fettig C. J., and C. W. Berisford. 1999. Nantucket pine tip moth phenology in eastern North Carolina and Virginia: implications for effective timing of insecticide applications. South. J. Appl. For. 23: 30-38.
12. Hatchell, G. E., C. R. Berry, and H. D. Muse. 1985. Non-destructive indicies related to above-ground above biomass of young loblolly and sand pines on ectomycorrhizal and fertilizer plots. For. Sci. 31: 419-427.
13. Haywood, J. D. 1986. Response of planted Pinus taeda L. to brush control in northern Louisiana. For. Ecol. Manage. 15: 129-134.
14. Hedden, R. L., and T. E. Nebeker. 1984. Integrated pest management in pine stands (0-5 years) - insects, pp. 39-53. In S. J. Branham and G. D. Hertel [eds.], Proceedings, Intergrated Forest Pest Management Symposium. University of Georgia Center for Continuing Education, Athens, GA.