Spatial molecular ecological models for genotyped adults and offspring

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 174, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 401-410

  Shimatani, Kenichiro ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF STATISTICAL MATHEMATICS   (Japan)

Author keywords

Female reproductive success; Inhomogeneous Poisson process; Isolation by distance; Pollen movement; Seed dispersal

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGICAL MODELING; POLLINATION; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SEED DISPERSAL; SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

ANIMALIA; FAGUS; FAGUS CRENATA;

EID: 1942473033     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.09.032     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Berg E.E., Hamrick J.L. Fine-scale genetic structure of a Turkey oak forest. Evolution. 49:1995;110-120.
2. Burczyk J., Adams W.T., Shimizu J.Y. Mating patterns and pollen dispersal in a natural knobcone pine (Pinus attenuata Lemmon) stand. Heredity. 77:1996;251-260.
3. Burczyk J., Adams W.T., Moran G.F., Griffins A.R. Complex patterns of mating revealed in a Eeucalyptus regnans seed orchard using allozyme markers and the neighbourhood model. Mol. Ecol. 11:2002;2379-2391.
4. Cressie, N., 1991. Statistics for Spatial Data. Wiley, New York.
5. Doligez A., Baril C., Joly H.I. Fine-scale spatial genetic structure with nonuniform distribution of individuals. Genetics. 148:1998;905-919.
6. Dow B.D., Ashley M.V. Microsatelite analysis of seed dispersal and parentage of saplings in bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa. Mol. Ecol. 5:1996;615-627.
7. Epperson B.K. Spatial distribution of genotypes under isolation by distance. Genetics. 140:1995a;1431-1440.
8. Epperson B.K. Fine-scale spatial structure: correlations for individual genotypes differ from those for local gene frequencies. Evolution. 49:1995b;1022-1026.
9. Haase P. Spatial pattern analysis in ecology based on Ripley's K-function: introduction and methods of edge correction. J. Veg. Sci. 6:1995;575-582.
10. Hardy O.L., Vekemans X. Isolation by distance in a continuous population: reconciliation between spatial autocorrelation analysis and population genetics models. Heredity. 83:1999;145-154.
11. Isagi Y., Kanazashi T., Suzuki W., Tanaka H., Abe T. Microsatelite analysis of the regeneration process of Magnolia obovata Thunb. Heredity. 84:2000;143-151.
12. Kawano S., Kitamura K. Demographic genetics of the Japanese beech, Fagus crenata, in the Ogawa Forest Preserve, Ibaraki, Central Honshu, Japan. III. Population dynamics and genetic substructuring within a metapopulation. Pl. Sp. Biol. 12:1997;157-177.
13. Kawata M. Effective population size in a continuously distributed population. Evolution. 49:1995;1046-1054.
14. Kitamura K., Shimada K., Nakashima K., Kawano S. Demographic genetics of the Japanese beech, Fagus crenata, at Ogawa Forest Preserve, Ibaraki, Central Honshu, Japan. I. Spatial genetic substructuring in local population. Pl. Sp. Biol. 12:1997;107-135.
15. Latta R.G., Linhart Y.B., Fleck D., Elliot M. Direct and indirect estimates of seed versus pollen movement within a population of ponderosa pine. Evolution. 52:1998;61-67.
16. Lian C., Miwa M., Hogetsu T. Outcrossing and paternity analysis of Pinus densiflora (Japanese red pine) by microsatellite polymorphism. Heredity. 87:2001;88-98.
17. Rathbun S.L. Estimation of Poisson intensity using partially observed concomitant variables. Biometrics. 52:1996;226-242.
18. Rathbun S.L., Cressie N. A space-time survival point process for a longleaf pine forest in Southern Georgia. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 89:1994;1164-1174.
19. Ribbens E., Silander J.A., Pacala S.W. Seedling recruitment in forests: calibrating models to predict parrens of tree seedlings dispersion. Ecology. 75:1994;1794-1806.
20. Schnabel A., Nason J.D., Hamrick J.L. Understanding the population genetic structure of Gleditsia triacanthos L.: seed dispersal and variation in female reproductive success. Mol. Ecol. 7:1998;819-832.
21. Shimatani K. Point processes for fine-scale spatial genetics and molecular ecology. Biomet. J. 44:2002;325-352.
22. Smouse P.E., Meagher T.R. Genetic analysis of male reproductive contributions in Chamaelirium luteum (L.) Gray (Liliaceae). Genetics. 136:1994;313-322.
23. Smouse P.E., Meagher T.R., Kobak C.J. Parentage analysis in Chamaelirium luteum (L.) Gray (Liliaceae): why do some males have higher reproductive contributions? J. Evol. Biol. 12:1999;1069-1077.
24. Stoyan D., Penttinen A. recent applications of point process methods in forestry statistics. Stat. Sci. 15:2000;61-68.
25. Stoyan D., Wagner S. Estimating the fruit dispersion of anemochorous forest trees. Ecol. Model. 145:2001;35-47.
26. Wright S. Isolation by distance. Genetics. 28:1943;114-138.