Comparative Testing of Pulse Oximeter Probes

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volumn 98, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 1354-1358

  Van Oostrom, Johannes H ^a,b,c,d   Melker, Richard J ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b J Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^d NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTERIAL OXYGEN TENSION; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER; DATA ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DISEASE SIMULATION; MOLECULAR PROBE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OPTICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE OXIMETER; PULSE OXIMETRY; RECORDING; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

EID: 1942468897     PISSN: 00032999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000105869.91626.3A     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Severinghaus JW, Naifeh KH, Koh SO. Errors in 14 pulse oximeters during profound hypoxia. J Clin Monit 1989;5:72-81.
2. Trivedi NS, Ghouri AF, Lai E, et al. Pulse oximetry performance during desaturation and resaturation: a comparison of seven models. J Clin Anesth 1997;9:184-8.
3. Barker SJ. "Motion-resistant" pulse oximetry: a comparison of new and old models. Anesth Analg 2002;95:967-72.
4. Weiss BM, Gattiker RI. Complications during and following radial artery cannulation: a prospective study. Intensive Care Med 1986;12:424-8.
5. Haas P, inventor; Bio-Tek Instrumentation, Inc, assignee. Process and system for simultaneously simulating arterial and non-arterial blood oxygen values for pulse oximetry. US patent 6,141,572. October 31, 2000
6. van Meurs WL, Good ML, Lampotang S. Functional anatomy of full-scale patient simulators. J Clin Monit 1997;13:317-24.
7. Cooke JE. When pulse oximeters fail: motion and low perfusion [abstract]. Anesthesiology 2000;93:A554.
8. van Oostrom JH, Melker RJ, Whibbs VJ III. Tool to improve physiologic data capture [abstract]. Br J Anaesth 1999;82(Suppl 1):20.
9. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-10.