Adaptive Feature-Space Conformal Transformation for Imbalanced-Data Learning

Proceedings, Twentieth International Conference on Machine Learning

Volumn 2, Issue , 2003, Pages 816-823

  Wu, Gang ^a   Chang, Edward Y ^a  

^a University of California   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE CONFORMAL TRANSFORMATION (ACT) ALGORITHM; DATA SETS; IMBALANCED-DATA LEARNING; KERNEL FUNCTIONS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES (SVM);

ADAPTIVE ALGORITHMS; CONFORMAL MAPPING; IMAGE RETRIEVAL; ITERATIVE METHODS; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; PATTERN RECOGNITION; VECTORS;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 1942451958     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Amari, S., & Wu, S. (1999). Improving support vector machine classifiers by modifying kernel functions. Neural Networks, 12, 783-789.
2. Breiman, L. (1996). Bagging predictors. Machine Learning, 24, 123-140.
3. Burges, C. (1999). Geometry and invariance in kernel based methods. in adv. in kernel methods: Support vector learning. MIT Press.
4. Chan, P., & Stolfo, S. (1998). Learning with non-uniform class and cost distributions: Effects and a distributed multi-classifier approach. Workshop Notes KDD-98 Workshop on Distributed Data Mining, 1-9.
5. Chang, E., Goh, K., Sychay, G., & Wu, G. (2003). Contentbased soft annotation for multimodal image retrieval using bayes point machine. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology Special Issue on Conceptual and Dynamical Aspects of Multimedia Content Description, 13, 26-38.
6. Chawla, N., Bowyer, K., Hall, L., & Kegelmeyer, W. P. (2000). Smote:synthetic minority over-sampling technique. International Conference on Knowledge Based Computer Systems.
7. Cohn, H. (1980). Conformal mapping on riemann surfaces. Dover Pubns.
8. Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995). Support vector networks. Machine Learning, 20, 273-297.
9. Cristianini, N., & Shawe-Taylor, J. (2000). An introduction to support vector machines. Cambridge University Press.
10. d'Alche Buc, F., Grandvalet, Y., & Ambroise, C. (2002). Semi-supervised marginboost. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
11. Dietterich, T., & Bakiri, G. (1995). Solving multiclass learning problems via error-correcting output codes. Journal of Artifical Intelligence Research, 2, 263-286.
12. Fawcett, T., & Provost, F. (1997). Adaptive fraud detection. In Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 1, 291-316.
13. Joachims, T. (1998). Text categorization with support vector machines: learning with many relevant features. Proceedings of ECML-98, 10th European Conference on Machine Learning, 137-142.
14. Kandola, J., & Shawe-Taylor, J. (2003). Refining kernels for regression and uneven classification problems. Proceedings of the Ninth International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics.
15. Karakoulas, G., & Taylor, J. S. (1999). Optimizing classifiers for imbalanced training sets. Advanced in Neural Information Processing Systems.
16. Kubat, M., & Matwin, S. (1997). Addressing the curse of imbalanced training sets: One-sided selection. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, 179-186.
17. Li, Y., Zaragoza, H., Herbrich, R., Shawe-Taylor, J., & Kandola, J. (2002). The perceptron algorithm with uneven margins. Proceedings of the Nineteeth International Conference on Machine Learning, 379-386.
18. Lin, Y., Lee, Y., & Wahba, G. (2002). Support vector machines for classification in nonstandard situations. Machine Learning, 46, 191-202.
19. Tong, S., & Chang, E. (2001). Support vector machine active learning for image retrieval. Proceedings of ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 107-118.
20. Vapnik, V. (1995). The nature of statistical learning theory. New York: Springer.
21. Veropoulos, K., Campbell, C., & Cristianini, N. (1999). Controlling the sensitivity of support vector machines. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 55-60.
22. Wu, S., & Amari, S. (2002). Conformal transformation of kernel functions: A data-dependent way to improve the performance of support vector machine classifiers. Neural Processing Letter, 15.