Approaches to the study of haptic sensing

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 93, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 3036-3043

  Henriques, Denise Y P ^a,b   Soechting, John F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARM MOVEMENT; BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; DIRECTIONAL VISION; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; GEOMETRY; HEALTH SURVEY; MOTOR NERVE CONDUCTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REVIEW; ROBOTICS; SENSORY SYSTEM; TACTILE STIMULATION; VISION; VISUAL ILLUSION; VISUAL INFORMATION;

ANIMALS; CUES; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FORM PERCEPTION; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 19344366871     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00010.2005     Document Type: Review

References (64)

1. Andersen RA. Inferior parietal lobe function in spatial perception and visuomotor integration. In: Handbook of Physiology. The Nervous System. Higher Functions of the Brain. Bethesda, MD: Am. Physiol. Soc., 1987, sect. 1, vol. V, pt. 2, p. 483-518.
2. Appelle S and Gravetter F. Effect of modality-specific experience on visual and haptic judgment of orientation. Perception 14: 763-773, 1985.
3. Atkeson CG and Hollerbach JM. Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements. J Neurosci 5: 2318-2330, 1985.
4. Averbeck BB, Chafee MV, Crowe DA, and Georgopoulos AP. Parallel processing of serial movements in prefrontal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 13172-13177, 2002.
5. Averbeck BB, Chafee MV, Crowe DA, and Georgopoulos AP. Neural activity in prefrontal cortex during copying geometrical shapes. I. Single cells encode shape, sequence, and metric parameters. Exp Brain Res 150: 127-141, 2003.
6. Baud-Bovy G and Soechting JF. Factors influencing variability in load forces in a tripod grip. Exp Brain Res 143: 57-66, 2002.
7. Birznieks I, Jenmalm P, Goodwin AW, and Johansson RS. Encoding of direction of fingertip forces by human tactile afferents. J Neurosci 21: 8222-8237, 2001.
8. Blake DT, Hsiao SS, and Johnson KO. Neural coding mechanisms in tactile pattern recognition: the relative contributions of slowly and rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors to perceived roughness. J Neurosci 17: 7480-7489, 1997.
9. Cutkosky MR and Howe RD. Human grasp choice and robotic grasp analysis. In: Dextrous Robot Hands, edited by Venkataraman ST and Iberall T. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1990, p. 5-31.
10. de'Sperati C and Viviani P. The relationship between curvature and velocity in two-dimensional smooth pursuit eye movements. J Neurosci 17: 3932-3945, 1997.
11. Fasse ED, Hogan N, Kay BA, and Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Haptic interaction with virtual objects. Biol Cybern 82: 69-83, 2000.
12. Flanagan JR and Rao AK. Trajectory adaptation to a nonlinear visuomotor transformation: evidence of motion planning in visually perceived space. J Neurophysiol 74: 2174-2178, 1995.
13. Gentaz E and Hatwell Y. Geometrical haptic illusions: the role of exploration in the Muller-Lyer, vertical-horizontal, and Delboeuf illusions. Psychon Bull Rev 11: 31-40, 2004.
14. Gnadt JW, Bracewell RM, and Andersen RA. Sensorimotor transformation during eye movements to remembered visual targets. Vision Res 31: 693-715, 1991.
15. Goodale MA, Meenan JP, Bulthoff HH, Nicolle DA, Murphy KJ, and Racicot CI. Separate neural pathways for the visual analysis of object shape in perception and prehension. Curr Biol 4: 604-610, 1994.
16. Goodbody SJ and Wolpert DM. The effect of visuomotor displacements on arm movement paths. Exp Brain Res 127: 213-223, 1999.
17. Goodwin AW, Browning AS, and Wheat HE. Representation of curved surfaces in responses of mechanoreceptive afferent fibers innervating the monkey's fingerpad. J Neurosci 15: 798-810, 1995.
18. Goodwin AW, John KT, and Marceglia AH. Tactile discrimination of curvature by humans using only cutaneous information from the fingerpads. Exp Brain Res 86: 663-672, 1991.
19. Goodwin AW, Macefield VG, and Bisley JW. Encoding of object curvature by tactile afferents from human fingers. J Neurophysiol 78: 2881-2888, 1997.
20. Goodwin AW and Wheat HE. Sensory signals in neural populations underlying tactile perception and manipulation. Annu Rev Neurosci 27: 53-77, 2004.
21. Henriques DY, Flanders M, and Soechting JF. Distortions in the visual perception of shape. Exp Brain Res 160: 384-393, 2005.
22. Henriques DY and Soechting JF. Bias and sensitivity in the haptic perception of geometry. Exp Brain Res 150: 95-108, 2003.
23. Henriques DYP, Flanders M, and Soechting JF. Haptic synthesis of shapes and sequences. J Neurophysiol 91: 1808-1821, 2004.
24. Hogan N, Kay BA, Fasse ED, and Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Haptic illusions: experiments on human manipulation and perception of "virtual" objects. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 55: 925-931, 1990.
25. Johansson R, Riso R, Häger C, and Bäckström L Somatosensory control of precision grip during unpredictable pulling loads. I. Changes in load force amplitude. Exp Brain Res 89: 181-191, 1992.
26. Johansson RS. Sensory input and control of grip. Novartis Found Symp 218: 45-59, 1998.
27. Johansson RS and Cole KJ. Sensory-motor coordination during grasping and manipulative actions. Curr Opinion Neurobiol 2: 815-823, 1992.
28. Johansson RS and Westling G. Coordinated isometric muscle commands adequately and erroneously programmed for the weight during lifting task with precision grip. Exp Brain Res 71: 72-86, 1988.
29. Jones LA and Hunter IW. The perception of stiffness: a neglected aspect of kinaesthesia. In: Human Information Processing: Measures, Mechanisms and Models, edited by Vickers D and Smith PL. London Elsevier Applied Science, 1989, p. 55-64.
30. Jones LA and Hunter IW. A perceptual analysis of stiffness. Exp Brain Res 79: 50-156, 1990.
31. Kappers AM. Large systematic deviations in the haptic perception of parallelity. Perception 28: 1001-1012, 1999.
32. Kappers AM and Koenderink JJ. Haptic perception of spatial relations. Perception 28: 781-795, 1999.
33. Klein Breteler MD, Meulenbroek RG, and Gielen SC. Geometric features of workspace and joint-space paths of 3D reaching movements. Acta Psychol 100: 37-53, 1998.
34. Knudsen EI. Experience alters the spatial tuning of auditory units in the optic tectum during a sensitive period in the barn owl. J Neurosci 5: 3094-3109, 1985.
35. Knudsen EI and Knudsen PF. Vision calibrates sound localization in developing barn owls. J Neurosci 9: 3306-3313, 1989.
36. Lacquaniti F, Terzuolo C, and Viviani P. The law relating the kinematic and figurai aspects of drawing movements. Acta Psychol 54: 115-130, 1983.
37. Lederman SJ and Klatzky RL. Extracting object properties through haptic exploration. Acta Psychol 84: 29-40, 1993.
38. Lederman SJ and Klatzky RL. Haptic identification of common objects: effects of constraining the manual exploration process. Percept Psychophys 66: 618-628, 2004.
39. Lederman SJ and Taylor MM. Perception of interpolated position and orientation by vision and active touch. Percept Psychophys 6: 153-159, 1969.
40. Logothetis N. Object vision and visual awareness. Curr Opin Neurobiol 8: 536-544, 1998.
41. Louw S, Kappers AM, and Koenderink JJ. Haptic detection thresholds of Gaussian profiles over the whole range of spatial scales. Exp Brain Res 132: 369-374, 2000.
42. Louw S, Kappers AML, and Koenderink JJ. Haptic discrimination of stimuli varying in amplitude and width. Exp Brain Res 146: 32-37, 2002.
43. McIntyre J, Stratta F, and Lacquaniti F. Viewer-centered frame of reference for pointing to memorized targets in three-dimensional space. J Neurophysiol 78: 1601-1618, 1997.
44. McIntyre J, Stratta F, and Lacquaniti F. Short-term memory for reaching to visual targets: psychophysical evidence for body-centered reference frames. J Neurosci 18: 8423-8435, 1998.
45. Miall RC and Haggard PN. The curvature of human arm movements in the absence of visual experience. Exp Brain Res 103: 421-428, 1995.
46. Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Hogan N, and Bizzi E. Neural, mechanical and geometric factors subserving arm posture in humans. J Neurosci 5: 2732-2743, 1985.
47. Pellegrini JJ and Flanders M. Force path curvature and conserved features of muscle activation. Exp Brain Res 110: 80-90, 1996.
48. Riesenhuber M and Poggio T. Models of object recognition. Nat Neurosci 3: 1199-1204, 2000.
49. Robles-De-La-Torre G and Hayward V. Force can overcome object geometry in the perception of shape through active touch. Nature 412: 445-448, 2001.
50. Romo R, Hernandez A, Zainos A, Lemus L, and Brody CD. Neuronal correlates of decision-making in secondary somatosensory cortex. Nat Neurosci 5: 1217-1225, 2002.
51. Romo R and Salinas E. Touch and go: decision-making mechanisms in somatosensation. Annu Rev Neurosci 24: 107-137, 2001.
52. Romo R and Salinas E. Flutter discrimination: neural codes, perception, memory and decision making. Nat Neurosci Rev 4: 203-218, 2003.
53. Sergio LE and Scott SH. Hand and joint paths during reaching movements with and without vision. Exp Brain Res 122: 157-164, 1998.
54. Shadmehr R and Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J Neurosci 14: 3208-3224, 1994.
55. Soechting JF and Poizner H. The use of motion cues in the haptic sense of circularity. Exp Brain Res In press.
56. Soechting JF and Terzuolo CA. Organization of arm movements in three-dimensional space. Wrist motion is piece-wise planar. Neuroscience 23: 53-61, 1987.
57. Song, W, Flanders M, and Soechting, JF. Effect of compliance on haptic perception of curvature. Somatosens Motor Res 21: 177-182, 2004.
58. Suzuki K and Arashida R. Geometrical haptic illusions revisited: haptic illusions compared with visual illusions. Percept Psychophys 52: 329-335, 1992.
59. Treutwein B. Adaptive psychophysical procedures. Vision Res 35: 2503-2522, 1995.
60. Viviani P, Campadelli P, and Mounoud P. Visuo-manual pursuit tracking of human two-dimensional movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 13: 62-78, 1987.
61. Viviani P and Cenzato M. Segmentation and coupling in complex movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 11: 828-845, 1985.
62. Voisin J, Benoit G, and Chapman CE. Haptic discrimination of object shape in humans: two-dimensional angle discrimination. Exp Brain Res 145: 239-250, 2002a.
63. Voisin J, Lamarre Y, and Chapman CE. Haptic discrimination of object shape in humans: contribution of cutaneous and proprioceptive inputs. Exp Brain Res 145: 251-260, 2002b.
64. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, and Jordan MI. Perceptual distortion contributes to the curvature of human reaching movements. Exp Brain Res 98: 153-156, 1994.