Improving teacher induction

Educational Leadership

Volumn 62, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 76-78

  Wayne, Andrew J ^a   Youngs, Peter ^b   Fleischman, Steve ^a  

^a American Institutes for Research (AIR)   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 18944396299     PISSN: 00131784     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Alliance for Excellent Education. (2004). Tapping the potential: Retaining and developing high-quality new teachers. Washington, DC: Author.
2. Andersen, L., &Pellicer, L. (2001). Teacher peer assistance and review: A practical guide for teachers and administrators. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
3. Cohen, B. A. (2005). Enhancing the "learning profession": Improving teacher retention with teacher induction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.
4. Danielson, C., & McGreal, T. L. (2000). Teacher evaluation to enhance professional practice. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
5. Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain practice. Teachers College Record, 703(6), 1013-1055.
6. Feiman-Nemser, S., & Parker, M. B. (1992). Los Angeles mentors: Local guides or educational companions? East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Learning.
7. Fideler, E., & Haselkorn, D. (1999). Learning the ropes: Urban teacher induction programs and practices in the United States. Belmont, MA: Recruiting New Teachers, Inc.
8. Kardos, S. M., Johnson, S. M., Peske, H. G., Kauffman, D., & Liu, E. (2001). Counting on colleagues: New teachers encounter the professional cultures of their schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(2), 250-290.
9. Little, J. W. (1990). The mentor phenomenon and the social organization of teaching. In C. B. Courtney (Ed.), Review of research in education, 16 (pp. 297-335). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
10. Lopez, A., Lash, A., Schaffner, M., Shields, P., & Wagner, M. (2004). Review of research on the impact of beginning teacher induction on teacher quality and retention. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
11. Shields, P., Haslam, B., LaGuarda, K., Lopez, A., Lash, A., Schaffner, M., et al. (2004). Identification and description of promising models of teacher induction. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
12. Smith, T. M., & Ingersoll, R. M. (2004). What are the effects of induction and mentoring on beginning teacher turnover? American Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 681-714.
13. Smylie, M., & Hart, A. (1999). School leadership for teacher learning and change: A human and social capital development perspective. In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (2nd ed.) (pp. 421-441). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14. Stein, M. K., & D'Amico, L. (2002). Inquiry at the crossroads of policy and learning: A study of a district-wide literacy initiative. Teachers College Record, 104(7), 1313-1344.
15. Villani, S. (2002). Mentoring programs for new teachers: Models of induction and support. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
16. Youngs, P. (2002). State and district policy related to mentoring and new teacher induction in Connecticut. New York: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future.