EBRA-FCA for measurement of migration of the femoral component in surface arthroplasty of the hip

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 87, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 741-744

  Beaule P E ^a,d   Krismer, M ^b   Mayrhofer, P ^c   Wanner, S ^b   Le Duff, M ^a   Mattesich, M ^b   Stoeckl, B ^b   Amstutz, H C ^a   Biedermann, R ^b  

^a JOINT REPLACEMENT INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b INNSBRUCK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

^c UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CADAVER; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; ENDOPROSTHESIS LOOSENING; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS MATERIAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; VALIDATION PROCESS; ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPATHY; BONE DISEASE; EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; FEMUR; HIP; HIP PROSTHESIS; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE DISEASES; CADAVER; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FEMUR; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; JOINT DISEASES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 18944393953     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B5.15377     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Daniel J, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJW. Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2004; 86-B:177-85.
2. Amstutz HC, Beaulé PE, Dorey FJ, et al. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2004;86-A:28-39.
3. Beaulé PE, Amstutz HC. Surface arthroplasty of the hip revisited: current indications and surgical technique. In: Sinha RJ, ed. Hip replacement: current trends and controversies. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc., 2002:261-97.
4. Sieber H-P, Rieker CB, Kottig P. Analysis of 118 second-generation metal-on-metal retrieved hip implants. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1999;81-B:46-50.
5. Mjoberg B. Theories of wear and loosening in hip prostheses: wear-induced loosening vs loosening-induced wear-a review. Acta Orthop Scand 1994;65:361-71.
6. Krismer M, Biedermann R, Stockl B, et al. The prediction of failure of the stem in THR by measurement of early migration using EBRA-FCA. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1999; 81-B:273-80.
7. Freeman MAR, Plante-Bordeneuve P. Early migration and late aseptic failure of proximal femoral prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1994;76-B:432-8.
8. Walker PS, Mai SF, Cobb AG, Bentley G, Hue J. Prediction of clinical outcome of THR from migration measurements on standard radiographs: a study of cemented Chamley and Stanmore femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1995;77-B:705-14.
9. Ilchmann T, Markovic L, Joshi A, et al. Migration and wear of long-term successful Chamley total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1998;80-B:377-81.
10. Kobayashi A, Donnelly WJ, Scott G, Freeman MAR. Early radiological observations may predict the long-term survival of femoral hip prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1997;79-B:583-9.
11. Selvik G. Roentgen stereophotogrammetry: a method for the study of the kinematics of the skeletal system. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 1989;232:1-51.
12. Karrholm J, Herberts P, Hultmark P, et al. Radiostereometry of hip prostheses: review of methodology and clinical results. Clin Orthop 1997;344:94-110.
13. Biedermann R, Krismer M, Stockl B, et al. Accuracy of EBRA-FCA in the measurement of migration of femoral components of total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1999;81-B:266-72.
14. Krismer M, Bauer R, Tschupik J, Mayrhofer P. EBRA: a method to measure migration of acetabular components. J Biomech 1995;28:1225-36.
15. Hardinge K, Porter M, Jones P, Hukins D, Taylor G. Measurement of hip prostheses using image analysis: the MAXIMA hip technique. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1991; 73-B:724-8.
16. Sutherland CJ, Wilde AH, Borden LS, Marks KE. A ten-year follow-up of one hundred consecutive Muller curved-stem total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1982;64-A:970-82.
17. Ilchmann T, Winter E. Migration, subsidence and wear after hip replacement. Hip 1999;9:104-11.
18. Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, LeDuff MJ, Gruen T, Amstutz HC. Risk factors affecting outcome of metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop 2004;418: 87-93.
19. Karrholm J, Borssen B, Lowenhielm G, Snorrason F. Does early micromotion of femoral prostheses matter? 4-7 year stereoradiographic follow-up of 84 cemented hip prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1994;76-B:912-17.
20. Nistor L. Blaha JD, Kjellstrom U, Selvik G. In vivo measurements of relative motion between uncemented femoral total hip component and the femur by roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. Clin Orthop 1991;269:220-7.
21. Karrholm J, Snorrason F. Subsidence, tip, and bump micromovements of noncoated ribbed femoral prostheses. Clin Orthop 1993;287:50-60.
22. Eldridge JD, Avramidis K, Lee M, Learmonth ID. Tantalum ball position after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1998;80-B:414-16.
23. Hamadouche M, Witvoet J, Porcher R, et al. Hydroxyapatite-coated versus grit-blasted femoral stems: a prospective, randomised study using EBRA-FCA. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2001;83-B:979-87.