Voter behavior in democratizing nations: Reconsidering the two-step model

Political Research Quarterly

Volumn 58, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 107-117

  Paolino, Philip ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 18944385474     PISSN: 10659129     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/106591290505800110     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Alvarez, R. Michael, and Jonathan Nagler. 1995. "Economics, Issues, and the Perot Candidacy: Voter Choice in the 1992 Presidential Election." American Journal of Political Science 39 (3): 714-44.
2. _. 1998a. "Economics, Entitlements, and Social Issues: Voter Choice in the1996 Presidential Election." American Journal of Political Science 42 (4): 1349-63.
3. _. 1998b. "When Politics and Models Collide: Estimating Models of Multiparty Elections." American Journal of Political Science 42 (1): 55-96.
4. Born, Richard. 1990. "Surge and Decline, Negative Voting, and the Midterm Loss Phenomenon: A Simultaneous Choice Analysis." American Journal of Political Science 34 (3): 615-45.
5. Bruhn, Kathleen. 2004. "The Making of the Mexican President, 2000: Parties, Candidates, and Campaign Strategy." In Jorge I. Domínguez and Chappell Lawson, eds., Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election: Candidates, Voters, and the Presidential Campaign of 2000. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
6. Canache, Damarys. 1996. "Review of Democratizing Mexico." Public Opinion Quarterly 60 (4): 657-60. Book Review.
7. Cinta, Alberto. 1999. "Uncertainty and Electoral Behavior in Mexico in the 1997 Congressional Elections." In Jorge I. Dominguez and Alejandro Poirè, eds., Toward Mexico's Democratization: Parties, Campaigns, Elections, and Public Opinion, pp. 174-202. New York: Routledge.
8. Dominguez, Jorge I. 1999. "The Transformation of Mexico's Electoral and Party Systems, 1988-97: An Introduction." In Jorge I. Dominguez and Alejandro Poirè, eds., Toward Mexico's Democratisation: Parties, Campaigns, Elections, and Public Opinion, pp. 1-23. New York: Routledge.
9. Dominguez, Jorge I. and James A. McCann. 1995. "Shaping Mexico's Electoral Arena: The Construction of Partisan Cleavages in the 1988 and 1991 National Elections." American Political Science Review 89 (1): 34-48.
10. _. 1996. Democratizing Mexico: Public Opinion and Electoral Choices. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
11. Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
12. Hansen, Wendy L. 1990. "The International Trade Commission and the Politics of Protectionism." American Political Science Review 84(1): 21-46.
13. Heiss, Florian. 2002. "Sructural Choice Analysis with Nested Logit Models." University of Mannheim, MEA typescript.
14. Key, V O., Jr. 1966. The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting, 1936-1960. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
15. Klesner, Joseph L. 2004. "The Structure of the Mexican Electorate: Social, Attitudinal, and Partisan Bases of Vicente Fox's Victory." In Jorge I. Dominguez and Chappell Lawson, eds., Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election: Candidates, Voters, and the Presidential Campaign of 2000. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
16. Lau, Richard R., and David P. Redlawsk. 2001. "Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision Making." American Journal of Political Science 45 (4): 951-71.
17. Lawson, Chappell. 1997. "The Elections of 1997." Journal of Democracy 8 (4): 13-27.
18. Maddala, G. S. 1983. Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
19. Magaloni, Beatriz, and Alejandro Poiré. 2004a. "The Issues, the Vote, and the Mandate for Change. In Jorge I. Dominguez and Chappell Lawson, eds., Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election: Candidates, Voters, and the Presidential Campaign of 2000. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
20. _. 2004b. Strategic Coordination in the 2000 Mexican Presidential Race. In Jorge I. Dominguez and Chappell Lawson, eds., Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election: Candidates, Voters, and the Presidential Campaign of 2000. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
21. McFadden, Daniel L. 1978. "Modelling the Choice of Residential Location." In A. Karlqvist, ed., Spatial Interaction Theory and Residential Location, pp. 75-96. Amsterdam: North Holland.
22. _. 1981. "Econometric Models of Probabilistic Choice." In C. F. Manski and D. L. McFadden, eds., Structural Analysis of Discrete Data and Econometric Applicatio, pp. 198-272. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Moreno, Alejandro. 1999. Political Cleavages: Issues, Parties, and the Consolidation of Democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview.
24. Morgenstern, Scott, and Elizabeth Zechmeister. 2001. "Better the Devil You Know than the Saint You Don't: Risk Propensity and Vote Choice in Mexico. "Journal of Politics 63 (1): 93-119.
25. Payne, John W. 1976. "Task Complexity and Contingent Processing in Decision Making: An Information Search and Protocol Analysis." Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 366-87.
26. Poirè, Alejandro. 1999. "Retrospective Voting, Partisanship, and Loyalty in Presidential Elections: 1994." In Jorge I. Domínguez and Alejandro Poirè, eds., Toward Mexico's Democratization: Parties, Campaigns, Elections, and Public Opinion, pp. 24-56. New York: Routledge.
27. Tversky, Amos. 1972. "Elimination by Aspects: A Theory of Choice." Psychological Review 281-99.