Inhibition of return following instructions to remember and forget

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

Volumn 58, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 613-629

  Taylor, Tracy L ^a  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); LEARNING; LONG TERM MEMORY; ORIENTATION; REACTION TIME; READING; RECALL; SHORT TERM MEMORY;

ATTENTION; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; MENTAL RECALL; ORIENTATION; REACTION TIME; READING; RETENTION (PSYCHOLOGY); SET (PSYCHOLOGY); VERBAL LEARNING;

EID: 18844438123     PISSN: 02724987     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02724980443000115     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Abrams, R. A., & Dobkin, R. S. (1995). Inhibition of return: Effects of attentional cuing on eye movement latencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 467-477.
2. Basden, B. H., & Basden, D. R. (1998). Directed forgetting: A contrast of methods and interpretations. In J. M. Golding & C. M. MacLeod (Eds.), Intentional forgetting: Interdisciplinary approaches (pp. 139-172). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
3. Basden, B. H., Basden, D. R., & Gargano, G. J. (1993). Directed forgetting in implicit and explicit memory tests: A comparison of methods. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 603-616.
4. Bjork, R. A. (1972). Theoretical implications of directed forgetting. In A.W. Melton & E. Martin (Eds.), Coding processes in human memory (pp. 217-235). Washington, DC: Winston.
5. Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (1996). Continuing influences of to-be-forgotten information. Consciousness & Cognition: An International Journal, 5, 176-196.
6. Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 25, 257-271.
7. Danziger, S., & Kingstone, A. (1999). Unmasking the inhibition of return phenomenon. Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 1024-1037.
8. Duncan, J. (1993). Coordination of what and where in visual attention. Perception, 22, 1261-1270.
9. Handy, T. C., Jha, A. P., & Mangun, G. R. (1999). Evidence for an attention component in inhibition of return. Psychological Science, 10, 157-161.
10. Kingstone, A., & Pratt, J. (1999). Inhibition of return is composed of attentional and oculomotor processes. Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 1046-1054.
11. Klein, R. M., & Taylor, T. L. (1994). Categories of cognitive inhibition, with reference to attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 113-150). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
12. Kubovy, M. (1988). Should we resist the seductiveness of the space:time::vision:audition analogy? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 318-320.
13. Kucera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
14. MacLeod, C. M. (1999). The item and list methods of directed forgetting: Test differences and the role of demand characteristics. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 123-129.
15. MacLeod, C. M., Dodd, M. D., Sheard, E. D., Wilson, D. E., & Bibi, U. (2003). In opposition to inhibition. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 43, pp. 163-214). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
16. Marks, W., & Dulaney, C. L. (2001). Encoding processes and attentional inhibition in directed forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1464-1473.
17. Palier, K. A. (1990). Recall and stem-completion priming have different electrophysiological correlates and are modified differentially by directed forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 1021-1032.
18. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X (pp. 531-556). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
19. Posner, M. I., Rafal, R. D., Choate, L. S., & Vaughan, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2(3), 211-228.
20. Rafal, R. D., Calabresi, P. A., Brennan, C. W., & Sciolto, T. K. (1989). Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 673-685.
21. Rafal, R. D., Egly, R., & Rhodes, D. (1994). Effects of inhibition of return on voluntary and visually guided saccades. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 284-300.
22. Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., Jha, A. P., & Rosenquist, J. N. (1996). What is inhibited in Inhibition of Return? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 367-378.
23. Taylor, T. L., & Klein, R. M. (1998). On the causes and effects of inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 625-643.
24. Taylor, T. L., & Klein, R. M. (2000). Visual and motor effects in IOR. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1639-1656.
25. Tsal, Y., & Lavie, N. (1993). Location dominance in attending to color and shape. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 131-139.
26. Zacks, R. T., Radvansky, G., & Hasher, L. (1996). Studies of directed forgetting in older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 143-156.