Numerical simulation of the cardiovascular system;Simulation numérique du système cardiovasculaire

Medecine/Sciences

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 530-534

  Gerbeau, Jean Frédéric ^a   Chapelle, Dominique ^a  

^a INRIA   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLOOD FLOW; CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HEART; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; REVIEW;

EID: 18844421403     PISSN: 07670974     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1051/medsci/2005215530     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Segers P, Stergiopulos N, Westerhof N, et al. Systemic and pulmonary hemodynamics assessed with a lumped-parameter heart-arterial interaction model. J Engin Mathematics 2003; 14: 185-99.
2. Monti A, Médigue C, Sorine M. Short-term control of the cardiovascular system: modelling and signal analysis. Rapport de recherche INRIA n° 4427. Paris: INRIA, 2002.
3. Caro CG, Fitz-Gerald JM, Schroter RC. Atheroma and aterial wall shear: observation, correlation and proposal of a shear dependant mass transfer mechanism for atherogenesis. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1971; 177: 109-59.
4. Zarins CK, Giddens DP, Bharadvaj BK, et al. Carotid bifurcation atherosclerosis: quantitative correlation of plaque localization with flow velocity profiles and wall shear stress. Circ Res 1983; 53: 502-14.
5. Yamamoto T, Tanaka H, Jones CJH, et al. Blood velocity profiles in the origin of the canine renal-artery and their relevance in the localization and development of atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb 1992; 12: 626-32.
6. Asakura T, Karino T. Flow patterns and spatial distribution of atherosclerotic lesions in human coronary arterie. Circ Res 1990; 66: 1045-66.
7. Botnar R, Rappitsch G, Scheidegger MB, et al. Hemadynamics in the carotid artery bifurcation: a comparison between numerical simulations and in vitro MRI measurements. J Biomec 2000; 33: 137-44.
8. Gerbeau JF, Vidrascu M. A quasi-Newton algorithm based on a reduced model for fluid-structure interaction problems in blood flows. Math Model Num Anal 2003; 37: 663-80.
9. Gerbeau JF, Vidrascu M, Frey P. Fluid-structure interaction in blood flows on geometries coming from medical imaging. Comput Struct 2005; 83: 155-65 (accessible sur http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00457949).
10. Quarteroni A, Rozza G. Optimal control and shape optimization in aorto-coronaric bypass anastomoses. Math Models Meth Appl Sci 2003; 13: 1801-23.
11. Panfilov AV, Holden AV. Computational biology of the heart. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 1997.
12. Huxley AF. Muscle structure and theories of contraction. In: Progress in biophysics and biological chemistry, vol. 7, chapter 6. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1957.
13. Zahalak GI. A distribution moment approximation for kinetic theories of muscular contraction. Math Biosci 1981; 55: 89-114.
14. Bestel J, Clément F, Serine M. A biomechanical model of muscle contraction. In: Niessen WJ, Viergever MA, eds. Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 2208. New York: Springer Verlag, 2001.
15. Julicher F, Adjari A, Prost J. Modeling molecular motors. Rev Modern Phys 1997; 69: 1209-81.
16. Hill AV. The heat of shortening and the dynamic constants in muscle. Proc Roy Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1938; 126: 136-95.
17. Chapelle D, Clément F, Génot F, et al. A physiologicoliy-based model far active cardiac muscle contraction. In: Katila T, Magnin I, Clarysse P, et al. eds. Functional imaging and modeling of the heart. New York: Springer Verlag, 2001.
18. Blum J, Le Dimet FX. Assimilation de données pour les fluides géophysiques. Matapli 2002; 67: 33-55.
19. Sainte-Marie J, Chapelle D, Sorine M. Data assimilation for an electromechanical model of the myocardium. In: Bathe KJ, ed. Proceedings of the second MIT Conference on computational fluid and solid mechanics, 17-20 juin 2003, Cambridge, MA, USA, vol. 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2005.