Conference review: Bovine genomics from academia to industry. Cattle and Sheep Workshop, Plant & Animal Genomes (PAG) XIII Conference, San Diego, CA, USA

Comparative and Functional Genomics

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 174-180

  Henderson, David ^a   Thomas, Milt ^b   Da, Yang ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BETA DEFENSIN; GENOMIC DNA; PEPTIDE DERIVATIVE; PLACENTA LACTOGEN; PROLACTIN;

ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT; ANIMAL FOOD; ANIMAL GENETICS; BACTERIAL ARTIFICIAL CHROMOSOME; BIOINFORMATICS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; BOVINE SPONGIFORM ENCEPHALOPATHY; CATTLE; CONFERENCE PAPER; COW; CYTOLOGY; DAIRY CATTLE; DNA MICROARRAY; DNA SEQUENCE; FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS; GENE FUNCTION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENE STRUCTURE; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC MODEL; GENOME ANALYSIS; GOAT; HEALTH CARE INDUSTRY; LACTATION; MAMMARY GLAND; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MOLECULAR CLONING; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SHEEP; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; T LYMPHOCYTE;

ANIMALIA; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); BOS TAURUS; BOVINAE; CAPRA HIRCUS; OVIS ARIES;

EID: 18844414496     PISSN: 15316912     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cfg.467     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Ashwell MS, Heyen DW, Sonstegard. TS, et al. 2004. Detection of quantitative trait loci affecting milk production, health, and reproductive traits in Holstein cattle. J Dairy Sci 87: 468-475.
2. Cowan CM, Dentine MR, Coyle T. 1992. Chromosome substitution effects associated with κ-Casem and β-lactoglobulin in Holstein cattle. J Dairy Sci 75: 1097-1104.
3. Casas E, White SN, Riley DG, et al. 2005. Assessment of single nucleotide polymorphisms in genes residing on chromosome 14 and 29 for association with carcass composition traits in Bos indicus cattle. J Anim Sci 83: 13-19.
4. Cundiff LV, Szabo F, Gregory KE, et al. 1999. Breed comparison in the germplasm evaluation program at MARC. USDA-MARC GPE Prog. Rep. No. 22. USDA.
5. Grosz MD, MacNeil MD. 2001. Putative quantitative trait locus affecting birth weight on bovine chromosome 2. J Anim Sci 79: 68-72.
6. Heaton MP, Harhay GP, Bennett GL, et al. 2002. Selection and use of SNP markers for animal identification and paternity analysis in US beef cattle. Mamm Genome 13: 272-281.
7. Hedges JF, Cockrell D, Jackiw L, et al. 2003. Differential mRNA expression in circulating γδ T lymphocyte subsets defines unique tissue-specific functions. J Leuk Biol 73: 306-314.
8. Hedges JF, Graf J, Jutila MA. 2003. Transcriptional profiling of γδ T cells. J Immunol 171: 4959-4964.
9. Kennedy BW, van der Werf HJ, Meuwissen THE. 1993. Genetic and statistical properties of residual feed intake. J Anim Sci 71: 3239-3250.
10. Kim JJ, Farnir F, Savell J, Taylor JF. 2003. Detection of quantitative trait loci for growth and beef carcass fatness traits in a cross between Bos taurus (Angus) and Bos indicus (Brahman) cattle. J Anim Sci 81: 1933-1942.
11. Li C, Basarab J, Snelling WM, et al. 2004. Identification and fine mapping of quantitative trait loci for backfat on bovine chromosomes 2, 5, 6, 19, 21 and 23 in a commercial line of Bos taurus. J Anim Sci 82: 967-972.
12. MacNeil MD, Dearborn DD, Cundiff LV, Dinkel CA, Gregory KE. 1989. Effects of inbreeding and heterosis in Hereford females on fertility, calf survival and preweaning growth. J Anim Sci 67: 895-901.
13. MacNeil MD, Urick JJ, Newman S, Knapp BW. 1992. Selection for postweaning growth in inbred Hereford cattle: the Fort Keogh, Montana line 1 example. J Anim Sci 70: 723-733.
14. Meissner N, Radke J, Hedges JF, et al. 2003. Serial analysis of gene expression in circulating γδ T cell subsets defines distinct inummoregulatory phenotypes and unexpected gene expression profiles. J Immunol 170: 356-364.
15. Moore SS, Li C, Basarab J, et al. 2003. Fine mapping of quantitative trait loci and assessment of positional candidate genes for backfat on bovine chromosome 14 in a commercial line of Bos taurus. J Anim Sci 81: 1919-1925.
16. Nkrumah JD, Li C, Yu J, et al. 2005. Polymorphisms in the bovine leptin promoter associated with serum leptin concentration, growth, feeding behavior, and measures of carcass merit. J Anim Sci 83: 20-28.
17. Page BT, Casas E, Heaton MP, et al. 2002. Evaluation of single-nueleotide polymorphisms in CAPN1 for association with meat tenderness in cattle. J Anim Sci 80: 3077-3085.
18. Page BT, Casas E, Quaas RL, et al. 2004. Association of markers in the bovine CAPN1 gene with meat tenderness in large crossbred populations that sample influential industry sires. J Anim Sci 82: 3474-3481.
19. Pariacote F, Van Vleck LD, MacNeil MD. 1998. Effects of inbreeding and heterozygosity on preweaning traits in a closed population of Herefords under selection. J Anim Sci 76: 1303-1310.
20. Taylor JF, Schnabel RD. 2004. Prospects for positional cloning of QTL in general pedigrees using the bovine whole genome sequence. Satellite Symposium to the 29th International Conference on Animal Genetics, Japanese Society of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Tokyo, Japan, 16-17 September.
21. Thallman RM, Bennett GL, Keele JW, Kappes SM. 2001. Efficient computation of genotype probabilities for loci with many alleles: I. Allelic peeling. J Anim Sci 79: 26-33.
22. Thallman RM, Bennett GL, Keele JW, Kappes SM. 2001. Efficient computation of genotype probabilities for Ioci with many alleles: II. Iterative method for large, complex pedigrees. J Anim Sci 79: 34-44.
23. Venter JC, Adams MD, Myers EW, et al. 2001. The sequence of the human genome. Science 291: 1304-1351.