Ex post economic analysis of reproduction-monitoring and predator-removal variables associated with protection of the endangered California least tern

Ecological Economics

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 277-287

  Shwiff, Stephanie A ^a   Sterner, Ray T ^a   Turman, John W ^b   Foster, Brian D ^c  

^a NATIONAL WILDLIFE RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b U S DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE   (United States)

^c INSTITUTE FOR CONSERVATION RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

California least tern; Economics; Endangered species; Predator management; Regression analysis; Reproduction monitoring

Indexed keywords

BREEDING POPULATION; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ENDANGERED SPECIES; PREDATOR CONTROL;

CALIFORNIA; CAMP PENDLETON; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD;

LARIDAE; STERNA ANTILLARUM BROWNI;

EID: 18844411638     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.08.008     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. M.L. Avery, M.A. Pavelka, D.L. Bergman, D.G. Decker, C.E. Knittle, and G.M. Linz Aversive conditioning to reduce raven predation on California least tern eggs Colon. Waterbirds 18 2 1995 131 138
2. A.C. Bent Life histories of North American gulls and terns U. S. Nat. Hist. Mus. Bull. 113 1921
3. K.J. Boyle, and R.C. Bishop Valuing wildlife in benefit-cost analyses: a case study involving endangered species Water Resour. Res. 23 5 1987 943 950
4. P.H. Butchko Predator control for the protection of endangered species in California Proc., Vertebr. Pest Conf. 14 1990 237 240
5. P.H. Butchko, and M.A. Small Developing a strategy of predator control for the protection of the California least tern: a case history Proc., Vertebr. Pest Conf. 15 1992 29 31
6. C. Caffrey California least tern breeding survey. 1993 season Nongame Bird and Mammal Conservation Program Rep vol. 94-3 1994 California Dept. Fish and Game Wildl. Manage. Div Sacramento, California 49pp.
7. R. Cullen, G. Fairburn, and K.F.D. Hughey Measuring the productivity of threatened species programs Ecol. Econ. 39 2001 53 66
8. W. Enders Applied Econometric Time Series 1995 John Wiley and Sons New York
9. R.M. Engeman, S.A. Shwiff, B. Constantin, M. Stahl, and H.T. Smith An economic analysis of predator removal approaches for protecting marine turtle nests at Hobe Sound National Wildlife Refuge Ecol. Econ. 42 2002 469 478
10. English, A.G. 1999. Predator management report for Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton Oceanside, California: 1999 California least tern and Western snowy plover breeding season. Unpublished report prepared for the Natural Resources Management Branch, Southwest Division Naval Facilities Engineering Command, San Diego, California. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Wildlife Services, El Cajon, California. 7pp.
11. Federal Register List of Threatened Fauna and Flora in the United States 35 1970 8491 8498
12. Foster, B.D. 1996. Breeding status of the California least tern at Marine Corp Base, Camp Pendleton, California, 1995. Unpublished report prepared for the Natural Resources Management Branch, Southwest Division Naval Facilities Engineering Command, San Diego, California. 176pp.
13. Foster, B.D. 1997. Breeding status of the California least tern at Marine Corp Base, Camp Pendleton, California, 1996. Unpublished report prepared for the Natural Resources Management Branch, Southwest Division Naval Facilities Engineering Command, San Diego, California. 53pp.
14. Foster, B.D. 1998. Breeding status of the California least tern at Marine Corp Base, Camp Pendleton, California, 1997. Unpublished report prepared for the Natural Resources Management Branch, Southwest Division Naval Facilities Engineering Command, San Diego, California. 114pp.
15. Foster, B.D. 1999. Breeding status of the California least tern at Marine Corp Base, Camp Pendleton, California, 1998. Unpublished report prepared for the Natural Resources Management Branch, Southwest Division Naval Facilities Engineering Command, San Diego, California. 112pp.
16. Foster, B.D. 2000. Breeding status of the California least tern at Marine Corp Base, Camp Pendleton, California, 1999. Unpublished report prepared for the Natural Resources Management Branch, Southwest Division Naval Facilities Engineering Command, San Diego, California. 111pp.
17. Foster, B.D. 2001. Breeding status of the California least tern at Marine Corp Base, Camp Pendleton, California, 2000. Unpublished report prepared for the Natural Resources Management Branch, Southwest Division Naval Facilities Engineering Command, San Diego, California. 122pp.
18. Foster, B.D. 2002. Breeding status of the California least tern at Marine Corp Base, Camp Pendleton, California, 2001. Unpublished report prepared for the Natural Resources Management Branch, Southwest Division Naval Facilities Engineering Command, San Diego, California. 128pp.
19. J. Grinnell, and A.H. Miller The distribution of the birds of California Pac. Coast Avifauna 27 1944 1 608
20. S.E. Hyngstrom R.M. Timm G.E. Larson Prevention and Control of Wildlife Damage 2nd Edition 1994 Great Plains Agricultural Council: Lincoln Nebraska (2 v (loose leaf))
21. J.B. Loomis, and E. Ekstrand Economic benefits of critical habitat for the Mexican Spotted Owl: a scope test using a multiple-bounded contingent valuation survey J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 23 2 1997 356 366
22. B.W. Massey, and J.M. Fancher Renesting by California least terns J. Field Orinthol. 60 1989 350 357
23. National Oceanic and Atmos pheric Association (NOAA, 1996-2001), www.noaa.com
24. E.E. Secrist Least tern Ocologist 32 1915 18
25. U.S. Department of the Interior Threatened Wildlife in the United States. Resource Publication 114 1973 Bureau of Sports Fisheries and Wildlife Washington, D.C. 153 154
26. U.S. Office of the Chief Counsel The Endangered Species Act: How Much Does it Cost the taxpayer? 1998 Office of the Chief Counsel Washington, DC 15pp.
27. J.C. Whitehead Ex ante willingness to pay with supply and demand uncertainty: implications for valuing a marine turtle protection programme Appl. Econ. 24 1992 981 988