Economic benefits of critical habitat for the Mexican spotted owl: A scope test using a multiple-bounded contingent valuation survey

Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 356-366

  Loomis, John ^a   Ekstrand, Earl ^b  

^a Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

^b U S BUREAU OF RECLAMATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Contingent valuation; Endangered species; Logit; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

STRIGIFORMES;

EID: 0031371123     PISSN: 10685502     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Alberini, A. Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder CO. Personal communication, 19 March 1997.
2. Arrow, K., R. Solow, P. Portney, E. Leamer, R. Radner, and H. Schuman. "Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation." Federal Register 58(1993):4602-614.
3. Bishop, R., and M. Welsh. "Existence Values in Benefit-Cost Analysis and Damage Assessement." Land Econ. 68(1992):405-17.
4. Brown, T., P. Champ, R. Bishop, and D. McCollum. "Which Response Format Reveals the Truth about Donations to a Public Good?" Land Econ. 72(1996):152-66.
5. Cameron, T., and D. Huppert. "OLS versus ML Estimation of Non-market Resource Values with Payment Card Interval Data." J. Environ. Econ. and Manage. 17(1989):230-46.
6. _. "Referendum Contingent Valuation Estimates." J. Amer. Statis. Assoc. 86(1991):910-19.
7. Cameron, T., and J. Quiggin. "Estimation Using Contingent Valuation Data from a Dichotomous Choice with Follow-up Questionnaire." J. Environ. Econ. and Manage. 27(1994):218-34.
8. Carson, R., M. Hanemann, R. Kopp, J. Krosnick, R. Mitchell, S. Presser, P. Ruud, K. Smith, M. Conaway, and K. Martin. "Referendum Design and Contingent Valuation: The NOAA Panel's No-Vote Recommendation." Disc. Pap. No. 96-05, Resources for the Future, Washington DC, 1995.
9. Carson, R., and R. Mitchell. "Sequencing and Nesting in Contingent Valuation Surveys." J. Environ. Econ. and Manage. 28(1995):155-73.
10. Champ, P., R. Bishop, T. Brown, and D. McCollum. "Some Evidence Concerning the Validity of Contingent Valuation: Preliminary Results of an Experiment," In Seventh Interim Report W-133, Benefits and Costs Transfer in Natural Resources Planning, ed., R. Ready, pp. 187-218. Dept. of Agr. Econ., University of Kentucky, Lexington KY, 1994.
11. Cummings, R., G. Harrison, and E. E. Rutstrom. "Homegrown Values and Hypothetical Surveys: Is the Dichotomous Choice Approach Incentive Compatible?" Amer. Econ. Rev. 85(1995):260-66.
12. Diamond, P., and J. Hausman. "Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better Than No Number?" J. Econ. Perspectives 8(1994):45-64.
13. Dillman, D. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1978.
14. Flores, N. "Reconsidering the Use of Hicks Neutrality to Recover Total Value." J. Environ. Econ. and Manage. 31(1996):49-64.
15. Freeman, M. The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values. Washington DC: Resources for the Future, 1993.
16. Hagen, D., J. Vincent, and P. Welle. "Benefits of Preserving Old Growth Forests and the Spotted Owl." Contemporary Policy Issues 10(1992):13-25.
17. Hanemann, M. "Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Response Data: Reply." Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 71(1989):1057-61.
18. Hanemann, M., J. Loomis, and B. Kanninen. "Statistical Efficiency of the Double-bound Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation." Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 73(1991):1255-263.
19. Kopp, R. "Why Existence Values Should Be Used in Cost-Benefit Analysis." J. Policy Anal. and Manage. 11(1992):123-30.
20. Loomis, J., A. Gonzalez-Caban, and R. Gregory. "Do Reminders of Substitutes and Budget Constraints Influence Contingent Valuation Estimates." Land Econ. 70(1994):499-506.
21. Loomis, J., and A. Gonzalez-Caban. "Importance of Market Area Determination for Estimating Aggregate Benefits of Public Goods." Agr. and Resour. Econ. Rev. 25(1996):161-70.
22. MacKenzie, J. "A Comparison of Contingent Preference Models." Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 75(1993):593-603.
23. Magelby, D. "Opinion Formation and Opinion Change in Ballot Proposition Campaigns." In Manipulating Public Opinion, eds., M. Maroli's and G. Mauser, pp. 423. Pacifc Grove CA: Brooks/Cole Publishers, 1989.
24. Metrick, A., and M. Weitzman. "Patterns of Behavior in Endangered Species Preservation." Land Econ. 72(1996):1-16.
25. Mitchell, R., and R. Carson. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Washington DC: Resources for the Future, 1989.
26. Neill, H., R. Cummings, P. Ganderton, G. Harrison, and T. McGuckin. "Hypothetical Surveys and Real Economic Commitments." Land Econ. 70(1994):145-54.
27. Park, T., J. Loomis, and M. Creel. "Confidence Intervals for Evaluating Benefit Estimates from Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Studies." Land Econ. 67(1991):64-73.
28. Poe, G., E. Severance-Lossin, and M. Welsh. "Measuring the Differences in Simulated Distributions: A Convolutions Approach." Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 76(1994):904-15.
29. Poe, G., and M. Welsh. "WTP Certainty Intervals and the Disparity between Contingent Valuation Elicitation Formats." Eighth Interim Report W-133, Benefits and Costs in Natural Resources Planning, ed., D. Larson, pp. 271-300. Dept. of Agr. Econ., University of California, Davis, 1995.
30. Polasky, S., O. Gainutdinova, and J. Kerkvliet. "Comparing CV Responses with Voting Behavior: Open Space Survey and Referendum in Corvallis, Oregon." Ninth Interim Report W-133, Benefits and Costs Transfer in Natural Resources Planning, ed., J. Herriges, pp. 105-30. Dept of Econ., Iowa State University, 1996.
31. Randall, A., and J. Stoll. "Existence Value in a Total Valuation Framework." In Managing Air Quality and Scenic Resources at National Parks and Wilderness Areas, eds., R. Row and L. Chestnut, pp. 265-74. Boulder CO: Westview Press, 1983.
32. Ready, R., J. Whitehead, and G. Blomquist. "Contingent Valuation When Respondents Are Ambivalent." J. Environ. Econ. and Manage. 29(1995):181-97.
33. Roe, B., K. Boyle, and M. Teisl. "Using Conjoint Analysis to Derive Estimates of Compensating Variation." J. Environ. Econ. and Manage. 31(1996):145-59.
34. Rowe, R., W. Schulze, and W. Breffle. "A Test for Payment Card Biases." J. Environ. Econ. and Manage. 31(1996):178-85.
35. Rubin, J., G. Helfand, and J. Loomis. "A Benefit-Cost Analysis of the Northern Spotted Owl." J. Forestry 89(1991):25-30.
36. Survey Sampling, Inc. National Sample: Job 093201. Fairfield CT, 29 March 1996.
37. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Recovery Plan for the Mexican Spotted Owl: Vol. I. Albuquerque NM, 1995.
38. Wang, H. "Treatment of 'Don't Know' Responses in Contingent Valuation Surveys: A Random Valuation Model." J. Environ. Econ. and Manage. 32(1997):219-32.
39. Welsh, M., and R. Bishop. "Multiple-Bounded Discrete Choice Models." In Sixth Interim Report W-133, Benefits and Costs Transfers in Natural Resources Planning, ed., J. Bergstrom, pp. 331-52. Dept. Agr. Econ., University of Georgia, 1993.