Subdomains of gender-related occupational interests: Do they form a cohesive bipolar M-F dimension?

Journal of Personality

Volumn 73, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 693-730

  Lippa, Richard A ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 18844376939     PISSN: 00223506     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00326.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 165-172.
2. Bem, S. L. (1987). Masculinity and femininity exist only in the mind of the perceiver. In J.M Reinisch, L. A. Rosenblum, & S. A. Sanders (Eds.), Masculinity/ femininity: Basic perspectives (pp. 304-311). New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Browne, K. R. (2002). Biology at work: Rethinking sexual equality. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
4. Campbell, D. P. (1977). Manual for the SVIB-SCII (2nd ed.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
5. Campbell, D. P., & Hansen, J. C. (1981). Manual for the SVIB-SCII (3rd ed.). Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
6. Cejka, M. A., & Eagly, A. H. (1999). Gender-stereotypic images of occupations correspond to the sex segregation of employment, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 413-423.
7. Deaux, K. (1987). Psychological constructions of masculinity and femininity. In J.M Reinisch, L. A. Rosenblum, & S. A. Sanders (Eds.) Masculinity/ femininity: Basic perspectives (pp. 289-303). New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M Trautner (Eds.) The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123-174). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Gottfredson, L. S. (1981). Circumscription and compromise: A developmental theory of occupational aspirations. Journal of Counseling Psychology Monograph, 28, 545-579.
10. Gottfredson, L. S. (1996). Gottfredson's theory of circumscription and compromise. In D. Brown & L. Brooks (Eds.), Career choice and development (3rd ed., pp. 179-232). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11. Holland, J. L. (1958). A personality inventory employing occupational titles. Journal of Applied Psychology, 42, 336-342.
12. Holland, J. L. (1996). Exploring careers with a typology: What we have learned and some new directions. American Psychologist, 51, 397-406.
13. Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
14. Holland, J. L. (1999). Why interest inventories are also personality inventories. In M. L. Savickas & A. R. Spokane (Eds.), Vocational interests: Meaning, measurement, and counseling use (pp. 87-101). Palo Alto, CA: Davies-Black.
15. Lippa, R. (1991). Some psychometric characteristics of gender diagnosticity measures: Reliability, validity, consistency across domains and relationship to the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 1000-1011.
16. Lippa, R. (1995). Gender-related individual differences and psychological adjustment in terms of the Big Five and circumplex models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1184-1202.
17. Lippa, R. (1997). The display of masculinity, femininity, and gender diagnosticity in self-descriptive photo essays. Journal of Personality, 65, 137-169.
18. Lippa, R. (1998a). The nonverbal judgment and display of extraversion, masculinity, femininity, and gender diagnosticity: A lens model analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 32, 80-107.
19. Lippa, R. (1998b). Gender-related individual difference and the structure of vocational interests: The importance of the "People-Things" dimension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 996-1009.
20. Lippa, R. (1998c). Gender-related individual differences and National Merit test performance: Girls who are "masculine" and boys who are "feminine" tend to do better. In L. Ellis & L. Ebertz (Eds.), Males, females, and behavior: Toward biological understanding. Westport, CN: Praeger.
21. Lippa, R. A. (2000). Gender-related traits in gay men, lesbian women, and heterosexual men and women: The virtual identity of homosexual-heterosexual diagnosticity and gender diagnosticity. Journal of Personality, 68, 899-926.
22. Lippa, R. A. (2001a). On deconstructing and reconstructing masculinity-femininity. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 168-207.
23. Lippa, R. A. (2001b). Gender-related traits in transsexuals and nontranssexuals. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 30, 603-614.
24. Lippa, R. A. (2002a). Gender, nature, and nurture. Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Lippa, R. A. (2002b). Gender-related traits of heterosexual and homosexual men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 77-92.
26. Lippa, R. A. (2003). Are 2D:4D finger-length ratios related to sexual orientation? Yes for men, no for women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 179-188.
27. Lippa, R. A. (2005). Sex and gender. In V. J. Derlega, B. A. Winstead, & W. H. Jones (Eds.) Personality: Contemporary theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 332-365). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
28. Lippa, R., & Connelly, S. C. (1990). Gender diagnosticity: A new Bayesian approach to gender-related individual differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1051-1065.
29. Lippa, R., & Hershberger, S. (1999). Genetic and environmental influences on individual differences in masculinity, femininity, and gender diagnosticity: Analyzing data from a classic twin study. Journal of Personality, 67, 27-55.
30. Lippa, R. A., Martin, L. R., & Friedman, H. S. (2000). Gender-related individual differences and mortality in the Terman longitudinal study: Is masculinity hazardous to your health? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1560-1570.
31. Loehlin, J. C., & Nichols, R. C. (1976). Heredity, environment, and personality: A study of 850 sets of twins. Austin: University of Texas Press.
32. Prediger, D. J. (1982). Dimensions underlying Holland's hexagon: Missing link between interests and occupations? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 21, 259-287.
33. Rounds, J. (1995). Vocational interests: Evaluating structural hypotheses. In D. Lubinski & R. V. Dawis (Eds.), Assessing individual differences in human behavior: New concepts, methods, and findings (pp. 177-232). Palo Alto, CA: Davies-Black.
34. Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity and Femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.
35. Strong, E. K., Jr. (1943). Vocational interests of men and women. Stanford, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
36. Terman, L. M., & Miles, C. C. (1936). Sex and personality: Studies in masculinity and femininity. New York: McGraw-Hill.
37. Tracey, T. J. G., & Rounds, J. (1993). Evaluating Holland's and Gati's vocational interest models: A structural meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 229-246.
38. Tracey, T. J. G., & Rounds, J. (1996). The spherical representation of vocational interests. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 48, 3-41.