Artificial neural network-aided image analysis system for cell counting

Cytometry

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 18-26

  Sjöström, Per Jesper ^a,c   Frydel, Beata Ras ^a   Wahlberg, Lars Ulrik ^a,b  

^a CytoTherapeutics Inc   (United States)

^b KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^c BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Artificial intelligence; Back propagation; Cell count; Computer assisted; Encapsulation; Image processing; Microscopy; Neural networks (computer); NIH Image

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; CELL COUNT; COMPUTER; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; HISTOGRAM; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHEEP;

CELL COUNT; HUMANS; IMAGE CYTOMETRY; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); NEURONS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 18744438529     PISSN: 01964763     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19990501)36:1<18::AID-CYTO3>3.0.CO;2-J     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Aebischer P, Wahlberg L, Tresco PA, Winn SR. Macroencapsulation of dopamine-secreting cells by coextrusion with an organic polymer solution. Biomaterials 1991;12:50-56.
2. Flanagan TR, Frydel B, Tente B, Lavoie M, Doherty E, Rein D, Emerich DF, Winn SR. Test for validating the safety of encapsulated xenografts. In: Flanagan TR, Emerich DF, Winn SR, editors. Providing pharmacological access to the brain: alternate approaches. San Diego: Academic Press; 1994. p 403-423.
3. Winn SR, Tresco PA. Hydrogel applications for encapsulated cellular transplants. In: Flanagan TR, Emerich DF, Winn SR, editors. Providing pharmacological access to the brain: alternate approaches. San Diego: Academic Press; 1994. p 387-402.
4. Haykin S. Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation. New York: Macmillan College Publishing Company. Inc.;1994.
5. Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ. Learning internal representations by error propagation. In: Rumelhart DE, McClelland JL, editors. Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1986. p 318-362.
6. Swingler K. Applying neural networks: a practical guide. London: Academic Press; 1996.
7. Tsoukalas LH, Uhrig RE. Fuzzy and neural approaches in engineering. New York: Wiley-Interscience; 1997.
8. Baxt WG. Use of an artificial neural network for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med 1991;115:843-848.
9. Brouwer RK, MacAuley C. Classifying cervical cells using a recurrent neural network by building basins of attraction. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 1995;17:197-203.
10. Kattan MW, Beck JR. Artificial neural networks for medical classification decisions. Arc Pathol Lab Med 1995;119:672-677.
11. Tu JV. Advantages and disadvantages of using artificial neural networks versus logistic regression for predicting medical outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 1996;49:1225-1231.
12. Gonzalez RC, Woods RE. Digital image processing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company; 1993.
13. Russ JC. The image processing handbook. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1995.
14. Furness PN, Rogers-Wheatley L, Harris KP. Semiautomatic quantitation of macrophages in human renal biopsy specimens in proteinuric states. J Clin Pathol 1997;50:118-122.
15. Gatlin CL, Schaberg ES, Jordan WH, Kuyatt BL, Smith WC. Point counting on the Macintosh. A semiautomated image analysis technique. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 1993;15:345-350.
16. Ide M, Jimbo M, Yamamoto M, Kubo O. Tumor cell counting using an image analysis program for MIB-1 immunohistochemistry. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 1997;37:158-162.
17. Kolles H, von Wangenheim A, Rahmel J, Niedermayer I, Feiden W. Data-driven approaches to decision making in automated tumor grading. An example of astrocytoma grading. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 1996;18:298-304.
18. Schaberg ES, Jordan WH, Kuyatt BL. Artificial intelligence in automated classification of rat vaginal smear cells. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 1992;14:446-450.
19. Mehdi B, Stacey D, Harauz G. A hierarchical neural network assembly for classification of cervical cells in automated screening. Anal Cell Pathol 1994;7:171-180.
20. Kruger T. Computer-assisted sperm analysis systems: morphometric aspects. Hum Reprod 1995;10:46-52.
21. Burl MC, Asker L, Smyth P, Fayyad U, Perona P, Crumpler L, Aubele J: Learning to recognize volcanoes on Venus. Mach Learn 1998;30:165-194.