Regulatory issues in merchant transmission investment

Utilities Policy

Volumn 13, Issue 2 SPEC. ISS., 2005, Pages 175-186

  Brunekreeft, Gert ^a  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Electricity; Investment; Merchant; Regulation; Transmission

Indexed keywords

ELECTRICITY SUPPLY; INVESTMENT; POWER GENERATION; REGULATORY APPROACH;

EID: 18744403692     PISSN: 09571787     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2004.12.006     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. ACCC ACCC Draft decision on Murraylink access undertaking: NSW submission, August 2002 2002 Australian Competition & Consumer Commission
2. ACCC Discussion paper: Review of the regulatory test, 5 Feb. 2003 2003 Australian Competition & Consumer Commission
3. ACCC Murraylink transmission company; application for conversion and maximum allowed revenue: Decision, 1 Oct. 2003 2003 Australian Competition & Consumer Commission
4. W.J. Baumol J.G. Sidak The pricing of inputs sold to competitors Yale Journal on Regulation 11 1994 171-202
5. G. Brunekreeft M. Godfried Netverbindingen door de markt ESB 89 2004 140-141
6. Brunekreeft, G., Newbery, D.N., 2004. Should merchant transmission investment be subject to a must-offer provision? Mimeo, March 2004, DAE-CMI, University of Cambridge.
7. G. Brunekreeft Regulation and third-party discrimination in the German electricity supply industry European Journal of Law and Economics 13 3 2002 203-220
8. G. Brunekreeft Regulation and competition policy in the electricity market; economic analysis and German experience 2003 Nomos Baden-Baden
9. Brunekreeft, G., 2004. Market-based investment in electricity transmission networks: Controllable flow. Utilities Policy,12, pp. 269-281.
10. J.B. Bushnell S.E. Stoft Electric grid investment under a contract network regime Journal of Regulatory Economics 10 1996 61-79
11. CAISO, 2000. Report on California energy market issues and performance: May-June 2000. Special report, Aug. 10, 2000, California Independent System Operator.
12. CAISO/LEI, Feb. 2003. A proposed methodology for evaluating the economic benefits of transmission expansions in a restructured wholesale electricity markets, California ISO.
13. A. Director E.H. Levi Law and the future: Trade regulation Northwestern University Law Review 51 1956 281-296
14. Gans, J., King, S., March 2003. Access holidays: The panacea for network infrastructure investment? Mimeo, University of Melbourne.
15. Gans, J., King, S., 2004. Access holidays and the timing of infrastructure investment. Economic Record, 80 89-100
16. R.J. Gilbert D.M. Newbery The dynamic efficiency of regulatory constitutions Rand Journal of Economics 25 4 1994 538-554
17. Glachant, J.-M., Pignon, V., 2003. Nordic electricity congestion's arrangement as a model for Europe: Physical constraints or operators' opportunity. Working paper DAE WP 0313/CMI WP 20, University of Cambridge/MIT.
18. R.J. Green D.M. Newbery Competition in the British electricity spot market Journal of Political Economy 100 5 1992 929-953
19. Harvey, S.M., Hogan, W.W., 2001. Market power and withholding. Mimeo, Harvard University, http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/hepg/.
20. D. Helm D. Thompson Privatised transport infrastructure and incentives to invest Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 25 1991 231-246
21. Hobbs, B.F., Rijkers, F.A.M., Wals, A.F., 2002. Strategic generation with conjectured transmission price responses in a mixed transmission pricing system. II: Application. Mimeo, ECN, Amsterdam.
22. W.W. Hogan Transmission market design, presented at Electricity Deregulation: Where to From Here? Conference at Texas A&M University, April 4th 2003 2003
23. P.L. Joskow Regulatory failure, regulatory reform, and structural chnage in the electric power industry Brookings Papers on Economic Activity; Microeconomics 1989 125-208
24. Joskow, P.L., Tirole, J., 2003. Merchant transmission investment. Journal of Industrial Economics, In press.
25. Kuijlaars, K.-J., Zwart, G., 2003. Regulatory issues surrounding merchant interconnection. Mimeo, DTe, The Hague.
26. Littlechild, S.C., 2004. Regulated and merchant interconnectors in Austalia: SNI and Murraylink revisited. Working paper CMI EP 37, University of Cambridge.
27. D.N. Newbery Competition, contracts and entry in the electricity spot market Rand Journal of Economics 29 4 1998 726-749
28. D.N. Newbery N.-H. Von der Fehr E. Van Damme UK-Netherlands DC interconnector 2003 MSC DTe The Hague p. 8
29. R.A. Posner Antitrust law; an economic perspective 1976 University of Chicago Press
30. R.A. Posner The Chicago school of antitrust analysis University of Pennsylvania Law Review 127 1979 925-952
31. J. Rosellón Different approaches towards electricity transmission expansion Review of Network Economics 2 3 2003 238-269
32. I. Vogelsang Price cap regulation of telecommunications services: A long-run approach In: M.A. Crew (Ed.), Deregulation and diversification of utilities 1989 Kluwer Academic Publishers Boston pp. 21-42