The impact of non-health attributes of care on patients' choice of GP

Australian Journal of Primary Health

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 40-46

  Haas, Marion ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Discrete choice experiments; General practitioners; Non health attributes; Patients' preferences

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONSULTATION; DECISION MAKING; DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EMOTIONAL STRESS; EVALUATION; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTICE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PATIENT CARE; TRUST;

EID: 18744362515     PISSN: 14487527     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1071/py05006     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (1999). Australia Now - A Statistical Profile. Canberra.
2. Bate, A. (1998). Examining patient preferences for junior doctors versus specialist nurses in the provision of rheumatology services: a discrete choice experiment. Aberdeen, HERU. 05.98.
3. Beutow, S. (1995). What do general practitioners and their patients want from general practice and are they getting it? A framework. Social Science and Medicine, 40(2), 213-221.
4. Brady, T. (1990). Patient control of treatment is essential. Arthritis Care and Research, 3(3), 163-166.
5. Cartwright, A. (1979). The dignity of labour: a study of childbearing and induction. London: Tavistock.
6. Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care. (2000). General Practice in Australia: 2000. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
7. Coulter, A. (1997). Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 2(2), 112-121.
8. Deber, R., Kraetschmer, N., & Irvine, J (1996). What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making? Archives of Internal Medicine, 156(13), 1414-1420.
9. Degner, L., & Sloan, J.A. (1992). Decision making during serious illness: what role do patients really want to play? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 45(9), 941-950.
10. Donaldson, C., Lloyd, P., & Lupton, D. (1991). Primary health care consumerism amongst elderly Australians. Age & Ageing, 20(4), 280-6.
11. Graf, M., & Tanner, D. (1993). Optimizing the delivery of patient and physician\satisfaction: a conjoint analysis approach. Health Care Management Review, 18(4), 34-43.
12. Guadagnoli, E., & Ward, P. (1998). Patient participation in decision making. Social Science and Medicine, 47(3), 329-339.
13. Haas, M. (2001). The Benefits of Health Care Beyond Health: An Exploration of Non Health Outcomes Of Health Care. Unpublished PhD thesis. Department of Public Health and Community Medicine. Sydney, University of Sydney.
14. Hall, J. (1996). The challenge of health outcomes. Journal of Quality in Clinical Practice, 16(1), 5-15; discussion 17-8.
15. Hall, J., Viney, R. & Haas, M. (2001). Using stated preference discrete choice modelling to evaluate health care programs. Journal of Business Research, Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01482963
16. Hynes, T. (2000). The financing of general practice. In Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care, General Practice in Australia. Canberra: 235-269.
17. Kaplan, S.H., Greenfield, S., & Ware, J.E. (1989). Assessing the effects of physician patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease. Medical Care 27 (Suppl. 3), S110-S, 127.
18. Lancaster, K. (1974). A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy, 74, 132-157.
19. Leavey, R., Wilkin, D., & Metcalfe, D. (1989). Consumerism and general practice. British Medical Journal, 298, 737-9.
20. Leeder, S. (1995). Understanding health outcomes in the context of Australian health care. Healthcover April-May, 29-32.
21. Louviere, J., Hensher, D., & Swait J. (2000). Stated choice methods: analysis and applications in marketing, transportation and environmental valuation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Lupton, D., Donaldson, C., & Lloyd P. (1991). Caveat emptor or blissful ignorance? Patients and the consumerist ethos. Social Science & Medicine, 33(5), 559-68.
23. Manski, C. (1977). The structure of random utility models. Theory and Decision, 8, 229-254.
24. Markham, F., Hermansen, C. (1999). The use of conjoint analysis to study patient satisfaction. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 22(3), 371-378.
25. Mooney, G. (1994). What else do we want from our health services? Social Science & Medicine, 39(2), 151-4.
26. Mooney, G., & Lange M (1991). Economic appraisal in pre-natal screening: reassessing the benefits. Aberdeen, Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen.
27. Ratcliffe, J., & Buxton, M. (1999). Patients' preferences regarding the process and outcomes of life-saving technology. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 15(2), 340-351.
28. Ryan, M. (1999). Using conjoint analysis to take account of patient preferences and go beyond health outcomes: an application to in vitro fertilisation. Social Science and Medicine, 48(4), 535-546.
29. Ryan, M., & Farrar, S (2000). Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care. British Medical Journal, 320, 1530-1533.
30. Ryan, M., & Hughes, J. (1997). Using conjoint analysis to assess women's preferences for miscarriage management. Health Economics, 6(3), 261-73.
31. Safran, D., Montgomery, J., Chang, H., Murphy, J., & Rogers, W. (2001). Switching doctors: predictors of voluntary disenrollment from a primary physician's practice. The Journal of Family Practice, 50(2), 130-136.
32. Salkeld, G., Ryan, M., & Short, L. (2000). The veil of experience: do consumers prefer what they know best? Health Economics, 9, 267-270.
33. Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 7-59.
34. SAS Institute Inc. (1989). SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6. Carey, NY.
35. SPSS Science. (1995). SYSTAT Version 8. Chicago.
36. Thaler, R. (1980). Towards a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economics, Behaviour and Organisation. 1, 39-60.
37. Turnbull, D., Wilkinson, C., Yaser, A., Carty, V., Svigos, J. M., & Robinson, J. S. (1999). Women's role and satisfaction in the decision to have a caesarean section. Medical Journal of Australia, 170, 580-583.
38. Vick, S., & Scott, A. (1998). Agency in health care. Examining patients' preferences for attributes of the doctor-patient relationship. Journal of Health Economics, 17, 587-605.
39. Williams, S., & Calnan, M. (1996). Modern medicine: lay perspectives and experiences. London: UCL Press Limited.