Examining the validity of a Swedish version of the self-presentation in exercise questionnaire

Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 113-134

  Lindwall, Magnus ^a,b  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b HALMSTAD UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Exercise; Factorial invariance; Factorial validity; Self presentation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; POPULATION RESEARCH; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIOLOGY; SWEDEN;

EID: 18644383652     PISSN: 1091367X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327841mpee0902_3     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Annerstedt, C. (1989). Pedagogers syn på fysisk fostran: Ett didaktiskt perspektiv [Teachers view on physical education: A didactic perspective]. Department of Education, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
2. Bacon, D. R., Sauer, P. L., & Young, M. (1995). Composite reliability in structural equations modeling. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 394-406.
3. Bentler, P. M. (1980). Multivariate analyses with latent variables: Causal modeling. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 419-456.
4. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
5. Bergman, L. R. (1995). Pretesting procedures at statistics Sweden's measurement, evaluation and development laboratory. Journal of Official Statistics, 3, 309-323.
6. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
7. Bond, M. H. (1991). Cultural influences on modes of impression management. In R. A. Giacalone & P. Rosenfeldt (Eds.), Applied impression management (pp. 195-215). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8. Brewer, B. W., Van Raalte, J., & Linder, D. E. (1993). Athletic identity: Hercules' muscles or Achilles heel? International Journal of Sport Psychology, 24, 237-254.
9. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1989). Single sample cross-validation indices for covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24, 445-455.
10. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternate ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11. Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modelling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
12. Conroy, D. E., & Motl, R. W. (2003). Modification, cross-validation, invariance, and latent mean structures of the Self-Presentation in Exercise Questionnaire. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 7, 1-18.
13. Conroy, D. E., Motl, R. W., & Hall, E. G. (2000). Progress toward construct validation of the Self-Presentation in Exercise Questionnaire (SPEQ). Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 22, 21-38.
14. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings. London: Houghton Mifflin.
15. Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302.
16. Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender related behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 369-389.
17. Duda, J. L., & Allison, M. T. (1990). Cross-cultural analysis in exercise and sport psychology: A void in the field. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 12, 114-131.
18. Duda, J. L., & Hayashi, C. T. (1998). Measurement issues in cross-cultural research within sport and exercise psychology. In J. L. Duda (Ed.), Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement (pp. 471-483). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
19. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1984). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Fenigstein, A., Scheier, M. F., & Buss, A. H. (1975). Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 522-527.
21. Fleming, J. C., & Martin Ginis, K. A. (2004). The effects of commercial exercise video models on women - s self-presentational efficacy and exercise task self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 16, 92-102.
22. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.
23. Fox, K. R., & Corbin, C. B. (1989). The Physical Self-Perception Profile: Development and preliminary validation. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11, 408-430.
24. Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women's lived experience and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173-206.
25. Gammage, K. L., Hall, C. R., Prapavessis, H., Maddison, R., Haase, A., & Martin, K. A. (2004). Re-examination of the factor structure and composition of the Self-Presentation in Exercise Questionnaire (SPEQ). Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 16, 82-91.
26. Golembiewski, R. T., Billingsley, K., & Yeager, S. (1976). Measuring change persistency in human affairs: Types of change generated by OD designs. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 12, 133-157.
27. Hart, E. A., Leary, M. R., & Rejeski, W. J. (1989). The measurement of social physique anxiety. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11, 94-104.
28. Hausenblas, H. A., Brewer, B. W., & Van Raalte, J. L. (2004). Self-presentation and exercise. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 16, 3-18.
29. Helms, J. E. (1992). Why is there no study of cultural equivalence in standardized cognitive ability testing? American Psychologist, 47, 1083-1101.
30. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 4, 424-453.
31. Isogai, H., Brewer, B. W., Cornelius, A. E., Komiya, S., Tokunaga, M., & Tokushima, S. (2001). Cross-cultural validation of the Social Physique Anxiety Scale. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 32, 76-87.
32. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User's reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
33. Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 3, 390-423.
34. Leary, M. R. (1992). Self-presentation processes in exercise and sport. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 14, 339-351.
35. Leary, M. R. (1995). Self-presentation: Impression management and interpersonal behavior. Madison, WI: Brown and Benchmark Publishers.
36. Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R .M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 34-47.
37. Lindwall, M. (2004a). Factorial structure and invariance across gender of the Swedish Self-Consciousness Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 82, 233-240.
38. Lindwall, M. (2004b). Factorial validity and invariance testing of the Swedish Social Physique Anxiety Scale: Arguments for gender-specific scales. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 26, 492-499.
39. MacCallum, R. C., & Austin, J. T. (2000). Applications of structural equation modelling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 201-226.
40. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130-149.
41. MacCallum, R. C., Roznowski, M., Mar, C., & Reith, J. (1994). Alternative strategies for cross-validation of covariance structure models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 1-32.
42. MacCallum, R. C., Roznowski, M., & Necowitz, L. B. (1992). Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: The problem of capitalization on chance. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 490-504.
43. Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with application. Biometrika, 57, 519-530.
44. Marsh, H. W. (1994). Confirmatory factor analysis models of factorial invariance: A multifaceted approach. Structural Equation Modeling, 1, 5-34.
45. Martin, K. A., Sinden, A. R., & Fleming, J. C. (2000). Inactivity may be hazardous to your image: The effects of exercise participation on impression formation. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 22, 283-291.
46. Martin Ginis, K. A., Jung, M., & Gauvin, L. (2003). To see or not to see: The effects of exercising in mirrored environments on feeling states and self-efficacy. Health Psychology, 22, 354-361.
47. Martin Ginis, K. A., Latimer, A. E., & Jung, M. E. (2003). No pain no gain? Examining the generalizability of the exercise stereotype to moderately active and excessive active targets. Social Behavior and Personality, 31, 283-290.
48. Motl, R. W., & Conroy, D. E. (2001). The Social Physique Anxiety Scale: Cross validation, factorial invariance, and latent mean structure. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 5, 81-95.
49. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
50. Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression management: The self-concept, social identity, and interpersonal relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
51. Tabachnik, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). London: Allyn & Bacon.
52. Ullman, J. B. (2001). Structural equation modelling. In B. G. Tabachnik & L. S. Fidell (Eds.), Using multivariate statistics (4th ed., pp. 653-771). London: Allyn & Bacon.