Modification, cross-validation, invariance, and latent mean structure of the self-presentation in exercise questionnaire

Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 1-18

  Conroy, David E ^a   Motl, Robert W ^b  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Impression management; Self presentation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HUMAN; KINESIOLOGY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MODEL; MOTIVATION; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF PRESENTATION IN EXERCISE QUESTIONNAIRE; SEX DIFFERENCE; SPORT; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0037283239     PISSN: 1091367X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15327841MPEE0701_1     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. American College of Sports Medicine. (2000). ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription (6th ed.). Baltimore: Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins.
2. Bacon, D. R., Sauer, P. L., & Young, M. (1995). Composite reliability in structural equations modeling. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 394-406.
3. Baumeister, R. F. (1982). A self-presentational view of social phenomena. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 3-26.
4. Bentler, P. M. (1980). Multivariate analysis with latent variables: Causal modeling. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 419-456.
5. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
6. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
7. Bentler, P. M., & Chou, C. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods and Research, 16, 78-117.
8. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
9. Boomsma, A. (2000). Reporting analyses of covariance structures. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 461-483.
10. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11. Conroy, D. E., Motl, R. W., & Hall, E. G. (2000). Progress toward construct validation of the Self-Presentation in Exercise Questionnaire (SPEQ). Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 22, 21-38.
12. Drasgow, F., & Kanfer, R. (1985). Equivalence of psychological measurement in heterogeneous populations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 662-680.
13. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.
14. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. London: Penguin.
15. Hart, E. A., Leary, M. R., & Rejeski, W. J. (1989). The measurement of social physique anxiety. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 11, 94-104.
16. Hoyle, R. H., & Panter, A. T. (1995). Writing about structural equation models. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 158-176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
18. Hutchinson, S. R., & Olmos, A. (1998). Behavior of descriptive fit indices on confirmatory factor analysis using ordered categorical data. Structural Equation Modeling, 5, 344-364.
19. Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User's reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
20. Leary, M. R. (1992). Self-presentational processes in exercise and sport. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 14, 339-351.
21. Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 34-47.
22. Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (1995). Social anxiety. New York: Guilford.
23. Li, F., Harmer, P., & Acock, A. (1996). The Task and Ego Orientation in Sport Questionnaire: Construct equivalence and mean differences across gender. Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport, 67, 228-238.
24. Little, T. D., Lindenberger, U., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1999). On selecting indicators for multivariate measurement and modeling with latent variables: When "good" indicators are bad and "bad" indicators are good. Psychological Methods, 4, 192-211.
25. MacCallum, R., Rosnowski, M., & Necowitz, L. B. (1992). Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: The problem of capitalization on chance. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 490-504.
26. MacCallum, R., Rosnowski, M., Mar, C., & Reith, J. (1994). Alternative strategies for cross-validation of covariance structure models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 1-32.
27. Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with application. Biometrika, 57, 519-530.
28. Mardia, K. V. (1974). Applications of some measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis in testing normality and robustness studies. Sankhya B, 36, 115-128.
29. Marsh, H. W. (1996). Positive and negative global self-esteem: A substantively meaningful distinction or artifactors? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 810-819.
30. Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., Balla, J. R., & Grayson, D. (1998). Is more ever too much? The number of indicators per factor in confirmatory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33, 181-220.
31. Martin, K. A., & Mack, D. (1996). Relationships between self-presentation and sport competition trait anxiety: A preliminary study. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 18, 75-82.
32. Motl, R. W., & Conroy, D. E. (2000). Validity and factorial invariance of the Social Physique Anxiety Scale. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 32, 1007-1017.
33. Motl, R. W., & Conroy, D. E. (2001). The Social Physique Anxiety Scale: Cross validation, factorial invariance, and latent mean structure. Measurement in Physical Education, Exercise, & Sport Science, 5, 81-95.
34. Motl, R. W., Conroy, D. E., & Horan, P. (2000). The Social Physique Anxiety Scale: An example of the potential consequences of negatively-worded items. Journal of Applied Measurement, 1, 327-345.
35. Olsson, U. H., Foss, T., Troye, S. V., & Howell, R. D. (2000). The performance of ML, GLS, and WLS estimation in structural equation modeling under conditions of misspecification and nonnormality. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 557-595.
36. Tanaka, J. S. (1987). "How big is big enough?": Sample size and goodness of fit in structural equation models with latent variables. Child Development, 58, 134-146.
37. Thompson, J. K., Heinberg, L. J., Altabe, M., & Tantleff-Dunn, S. (1999). Exacting beauty: Theory, assessment, and treatment of body image disturbance. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
38. Tomás, J. M., & Oliver, A. (1999). Rosenberg's Self-Esteem Scale: Two factors or method effects. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 84-98.