Letter to the Editor (multiple letters)

International Orthopaedics

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 61-

  Handoll, Helen ^a,c   Parker, Martyn ^b   Audigé, Laurent ^d   Hanson, B ^d   Swiontkowski, M F ^e  

^a TEESSIDE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b PETERBOROUGH DISTRICT HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c ROYAL INFIRMARY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^d AO RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Switzerland)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE NAIL; BONE PLATE; BONE SCREW; CLINICAL TRIAL; COCHRANE LIBRARY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DEVICE; EMBASE; FEMUR INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURE; INTRAMEDULLARY NAIL; LETTER; MEDLINE; META ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; REOPERATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; FEMUR; HIP FRACTURE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; OSTEOSYNTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

BONE NAILS; FEMUR; FRACTURE FIXATION, INTERNAL; HIP FRACTURES; HUMANS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 18544410422     PISSN: 03412695     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-003-0528-8     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. 1. Audigé 2003 Int Orthop 27 197 10.1007/s00264-003-0457-6 12734684 Audigé L, Hanson B, Swiontkowski MF (2003) Implant-related complications in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures: Meta-analysis of dynamic screw-plate versus dynamic screw-intramedullary nail devices. Int Orthop 27:197–203
2. 2. Egger 1998 BMJ 316 61 1:STN:280:DyaK1c7htlWjtg%3D%3D 9451274 Egger M, Davey Smith G (1998) Meta-analysis. Bias in location and selection of studies. BMJ 316:61–66
3. 3. Oxman 1992 Ann Intern Med 116 78 1:STN:280:By2D2svntFE%3D 1530753 Oxman AD, Guyatt GH (1992) A consumer’s guide to subgroup analyses. Ann Intern Med 116:78–84
4. 4. Parker MJ, Handoll HH (2003) Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, Wiley: Chichester