Mapping genomic rearrangements in titi monkeys by chromosome flow sorting and multidirectional in-situ hybridization

Chromosome Research

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 85-96

  Dumas, F ^a   Bigoni, F ^b   Stone, G ^b   Sineo, L ^a   Stanyon, R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PALERMO   (Italy)

^b NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Chromosome painting; Comparative genomics; Phylogeny; Primates; Speciation

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; CHROMOSOME PAINTING; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GENE MAPPING; GENE REARRANGEMENT; GENOMIC IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; HAPLOIDY; KARYOTYPE; MALE; METAPHASE CHROMOSOME; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR PROBE; MONKEY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

ANIMALS; CEBIDAE; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; CHROMOSOME PAINTING; CHROMOSOMES, MAMMALIAN; DIPLOIDY; DNA PROBES; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GENE REARRANGEMENT; GENOME; HUMANS; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; KARYOTYPING; METAPHASE; SYNTENY;

CALLICEBUS; CALLICEBUS CUPREUS; CALLICEBUS PALLESCENS; CYRILLA; PRIMATES; ROBERTSONIA;

EID: 18544389666     PISSN: 09673849     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10577-005-7063-y     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (49)

1. Bailey JA, Gu Z, Clark RA et al. (2002) Recent segmental duplications in the human genome. Science 297: 1003-1007.
2. Bailey JA, Baertsch R, Kent WJ, Haussler D, Eichler EE (2004) Hotspots of mammalian chromosomal evolution. Genome Biol 5: R23.
3. Barros RM, Pieczarka JC, Brigido MD, Muniz JA, Rodrigues LR, Nagamachi CY (2000) A new karyotype in Callicebus torquatus (Cebidae, Primates). Hereditas 133: 55-58.
4. Barros RM, Nagamachi CY, Pieczarka JC et al. (2003) Chromosomal studies in Callicebus donacophilus pallescens, with classic and molecular cytogenetic approaches: multi-colour FISH using human and Saguinus oedipus painting probes. Chromosome Res 11: 327-334.
5. Benirschke K, Bogart MH (1976) Chromosomes of the tan-handed titi (Callicebus torquatus, Hoffmannsegg, 1807). Folia Primatol (Basel) 25: 25-34.
6. Bonvicino CR, Penna-Firme V, do Nascimento FF, Lemos B, Stanyon R, Seuanez HN (2003) The lowest diploid number (2n = 16) yet found in any primate: Callicebus lugens (Humboldt, 1811). Folia Primatol (Basel) 74: 141-149.
7. Consigliere S, Stanyon R, Koehler U, Agoramoorthy G, Wienberg J (1996) Chromosome painting defines genomic rearrangements between red howler monkey subspecies. Chromosome Res 4: 264-270.
8. de Boer LEM (1974) Cytotaxonomy of the Platyrrhini (Primates). Genen Phaenen 17: 1-155.
9. de Oliveira EH, Neusser M, Figueiredo WB et al. (2002) The phylogeny of howler monkeys (Alouatta, Platyrrhini): reconstruction by multicolor cross-species chromosome painting. Chromosome Res 10: 669-683.
10. Dutrillaux B, Couturier J, Viegas Pequignot E (1986) Evolution chromosomique des Platyrhiniens. Mammalia 50: 56-81.
11. Egozcue J, Perkins EM, Hagemenas F, Ford DM (1969) The chromosomes of some platyrrhini (Callicebus, Ateles and Saimiri). Folia Primatol (Basel) 11: 17-27.
12. Fleagle JG (1988) Primate Adaptation and Evolution. New York: Academic Press.
13. Ford S (1986) Systematics of the New World monkeys. In: Swindler D, Erwin J eds. Comparative Primate Biology. New York: AR Liss, pp 73-135.
14. Ford SM, Davis LC (1992) Systematics and body size: implications for feeding adaptations in New World monkeys. Am J Phys Anthropol 88: 415-468.
15. Garcia F, Ruiz-Herrera A, Egozcue J, Ponsa M, Garcia M (2002) Chromosomal homologies between Cebus and Ateles (primates) based on ZOO-FISH and G-banding comparisons. Am J Primatol 57: 177-188.
16. Groves CP (2001) Primate Taxonomy. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.
17. Hershkovitz P (1963) A systematic and zoogeographic account of the monkeys of the genus Callicebus (Cebidae) of the Amazonas and Orinoco River basins. Mammalia 27: 1-80.
18. Hershkovitz P (1990) Titis, New World monkeys of the genus Callicebus (Cebidae, Platyrrhini) a preliminary taxonomic review. Field Zool 55: 1-109.
19. Horovitz I, Zardoya R, Meyer A (1998) Platyrrhine systematics: a simultaneous analysis of molecular and morphological data. Am J Phys Anthropol 106: 261-281.
20. Kay RF (1990) The phyletic relationships of extant and fossil Pitheciinae (Platyrrhini, Anthropoidea). J Hum Evol 4: 448-456.
21. Kinzey WG (1992) Dietary and dental adaptations in the Pitheciinae. Am J Phys Anthropol 88: 499-514.
22. Klever M, Grond-Ginsbach C, Scherthan H, Schroeder-Kurth TM (1991) Chromosomal in situ suppression hybridization after Giemsa banding. Hum Genet 86: 484-486.
23. Kobayashi S (1995) A phylogenetic study of titi monkeys genus Callicebus, based on cranial measurements: I. Phyletic groups of Callicebus. Primates 36: 101-120.
24. Kobayashi S, Langguth AL (1999) A new species of titi monkey, Callicebus Thomas, from north-eastern Brazil (Primates, Cebidae). Revista Brazileira de Zoologia 16(2): 531-551.
25. Minezawa M, Borda CJV (1984) Cytogenetic study of the Bolivian titi and revision of its cytotaxonomic state. Kyoto Univ. Overseas Rep New World Monkeys 4: 39-45.
26. Minezawa M, Jordan OC, Valdivia CJ (1989) Karyotypic study of Titi monkeys, Callicebus moloch brunneus. Primates 30: 81-88.
27. Muller S, Stanyon R, O'Brien PC, Ferguson-Smith MA, Plesker R, Wienberg J (1999) Defining the ancestral karyotype of all primates by multidirectional chromosome painting between tree shrews, lemurs and humans. Chromosoma 108: 393-400.
28. Muller S, Neusser M, O'Brien PC, Wienberg J (2001) Molecular cytogenetic characterization of the EBV-producing cell line B95-8 (Saguinus oedipus, Platyrrhini) by chromosome sorting and painting. Chromosome Res 9: 689-693.
29. Nagamachi CY, Rodrigues LR, Galetti JR PM et al. (2003) Cytogenetic studies in Callicebus persona tus nigrifons. Caryologia 56: 47-52.
30. Neusser M, Stanyon R, Bigoni F, Wienberg J, Muller S (2001) Molecular cytotaxonomy of New World monkeys (Platyrrliini) - comparative analysis of five species by multi-color chromosome painting gives evidence for a classification of Callimico goeldii within the family of Callitrichidae. Cytogenet Cell Genet 94: 206-215.
31. Pieczarka JC, Nagamachi CY (1988) The karyotype of Callicehus moloch moloch (Cebidae, Primates). Rev Brasil Gener 11: 653-659.
32. Porter CA, Czelusniak J, Schneider H, Schneider MP, Sampaio I, Goodman M (1999) Sequences from the 5′ flanking region of the epsilon-globin gene support the relationship of Callicebus with the pitheciins. Am J Primatol 48: 69-75.
33. Rodrigues LR, Barros RM, Pissinati A, Pieczarka JC, Nagamachi CY (2001) Cytogenetic study of Callicebus hoffmannsii (Cebidae, Primates) and comparison with C. m. moloch. Cytobios 105: 137-145.
34. Rodrigues LR, Barros RM, Pissinati A, Pieczarka JC, Nagamachi CY (2004) A new karyotype of an endangered primate species (Callicebus personatus) from the Brazilian Atlantic forests. Hereditas 140: 87-91.
35. van Roosmalen MGM, van Roosmalen T, Mittermeier RA (2002) A taxonomic review of the titi monkeys, genus Callicebus (Thomas, 1903), with the description of two new species, Callicebus bernhardi and Callicebus stephennashi, from Brazilian Amazonia. Neotrop Primates 10(suppl): 1-52.
36. Rosenberger AL (1981) Systematics: the higher taxa. In: Coimbra-Filho AF, Mittermaier RA, eds. Ecology and Behaviour of Neotropical Primates. Rio de Janeiro: Academia Brasileira de Ciencias, pp. 9-27.
37. Rosenberger AL, Coimbra-Filho AF (1984) Morphology, taxonomic status and affinities of the lion tamarins, Leontopithecus (Callitrichinae, Cebidae). Folia Primatol 42: 149-179.
38. Schneider H (2000) The current status of the New World monkey phylogeny. An Acad Bras Cienc 72: 165-172.
39. Schneider H, Canavez FC, Sampaio I, Moreira MA, Tagliaro CH, Seuanez HN (2001) Can molecular data place each neotropical monkey in its own branch? Chromosoma 109: 515-523.
40. Schneider H, Schneider MP, Sampaio MI et al. (1993) Divergence between biochemical and cytogenetic differences in three species of the Callicebus moloch group. Am J Phys Anthropol 90: 345-350.
41. Small MF, Stanyon R, Smith DG, Sineo L (1985) High-resolution chromosomes of rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Am J Primatol 9: 63-67.
42. Stanyon R, Tofanelli S, Morescalchi A, Agoormorthy G, Ryde OA, Wienberg J (1995) Cytogenetic analysis shows extensive genomic rearrangements between Alouatta subspecies. Am J Primatol 35: 171-183.
43. Stanyon R, Consigliere S, Muller S, Morescalchi A, Neusser M, Wienberg J (2000) Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) maps chromosomal homologies between the dusky titi and squirrel monkey. Am J Primatol 50: 95-107.
44. Stanyon R, Consigliere S, Bigoni F, Ferguson-Smith M, O'Brien PC, Wienberg J (2001) Reciprocal chromosome painting between a New World primate, the woolly monkey, and humans. Chromosome Res 9: 97-106.
45. Stanyon R, Bonvicino CR, Svartman M, Seuanez HN (2003) Chromosome painting in Callicebus lugens, the species with the lowest diploid number (2n = 16) known in primates. Chromosoma 112: 201-206.
46. Stanyon R, Bigoni F, Slaby T et al. (2004) Multi-directional chromosome painting maps homologies between species belonging to three genera of New World monkeys and humans. Chromosoma, 113: 301-315.
47. Telenius H, Pelmear AH, Tunnacliffe A et al. (1992) Cytogenetic analysis by chromosome painting using DOP-PCR amplified flow-sorted chromosomes. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 4: 257-263.
48. von Dornum M, Ruvolo M (1999) Phylogenetic relationships of the New World monkeys (Primates, Platyrrhini) based on nuclear G6PD DNA sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 11: 459-476.
49. Wienberg J, Stanyon R (1997) Comparative painting of mammalian chromosomes. Curr Opin Genet Dev 7: 784-791.