Choosing reference taxa in phylogenetic nomenclature

Zoologica Scripta

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 329-331

  Lee, Michael S Y ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^b SOUTH AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 18544367383     PISSN: 03003256     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-6409.2005.00196.x     Document Type: Short Survey

References (11)

1. Cantino, P. D. & de Queiroz, K. (2003). Phylocode: a Phylogenetic Code of Biological Nomenclature, Version 2. http://www.ohiou.edu/phylocode.
2. Cantino, P. D., Olmstead, R. G. & Wagstaff, S. J. (1997). A comparison of phylogenetic nomenclature with the current System: a botanical case study. Systematic Biology, 46, 313-331.
3. Joyce, W. G., Parham, J. F. & Gauthier, J. A. (2004). Developing a protocol for the conversion of rank-based names to phylogenetically defined clade names, as exemplified by turtles. Journal of Palaeontology, 78, 989-1013.
4. Laurin, M. & Anderson, J. S. (2004). Meaning of the name Tetrapoda in the scientific literature: an exchange. Systematic Biology, 53, 68-80.
5. Lee, M. S. Y. (1998). Phylogenetic uncertainty, molecular sequences, and the definition of taxon names. Systematic Biology, 47, 719-726.
6. Moore, G. (1998). A comparision of traditional and phylogenetic nomenclature. Taxon, 47, 561-579.
7. de Queiroz, K. & Gauthier, J. (1992). Phylogenetic taxonomy. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 23, 449-480.
8. Schander, C. & Thollesson, M. (1995). Phylogenetic taxonomy - some comments. Zoologica Scripta, 24, 263-268.
9. Sereno, P. C. (1999). Definitions in phylogenetic taxonomy: critique and rationale. Systematic Biology, 48, 329-351.
10. Thorley, J. L. & Page, R. D. M. (2000). RadCon: Phylogenetic tree comparison and consensus. Bioinformatics, 16, 486-487.
11. Thorley, J. L. & Wilkinson, M. (1999). Testing the phylogenetic stability of early tetrapods. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 200, 343-344.