Enterprise architecture modelling - The issue of integration

Advanced Engineering Informatics

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 205-216

  Lankhorst, Marc M ^a  

^a TELEMATICA INSTITUUT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Enterprise architecture; Modelling tools; Software architecture; Tool integration

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACTING; COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE; MODELLING TOOLS; SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE; TOOL INTEGRATION;

COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE;

EID: 18544365806     PISSN: 14740346     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aei.2005.01.005     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. P. Bernus, L. Nemes, and G. Schmidt Handbook on enterprise architecture 2003 Springer Berlin
2. G. Booch, J. Rumbaugh, and I. Jacobson The unified modeling language user guide 1999 Addison-Wesley Reading, MA
3. Creasy PN, Ellis, G.A Conceptual graph approach to conceptual schema integration. In: Proceedings of the ICCS'93, conceptual graphs for knowledge representation: first international conference on conceptual structures, Quebec, Canada; 1993.
4. Eertink H, Janssen W, Oude Luttighuis P, Teeuw W, Vissers C.A Business process design language. In: Proceedings of the first world congress on formal methods, Toulouse, France; September 1999.
5. H-E. Eriksson, and M. Penker Business modeling with UML: business patterns at work 2000 Wiley New York
6. D.S. Frankel Model driven architecture: applying MDA to enterprise computing 2003 Wiley New York
7. E. Gamma, R. Helm, R. Johnson, and J. Vlissides Design patterns: elements of reusable object-oriented software Addison-Wesley 1995 Reading, MA
8. Garlan D, Monroe RT, Wile D. ACME: an architecture description interchange language. In: Proceedings of the CASCON '97, Toronto, Canada; November 1997. p. 169-83
9. R. Handler Selecting architecture modeling tools 2003 EPAS, META Group
10. J.C. Henderson, and N. Venkatraman Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organizations IBM Syst J 32 1 1993
11. Iacob M, et al. State of the art in architecture support, ArchiMate deliverable D3.1. Enschede, The Netherlands: Telematica Instituut; 2003. http://doc.telin.nl/dscgi/ds.py/Get/File-27882/
12. IDEF Integration definition for function modeling (IDEF0) draft Federal information processing standards publication FIPSPUB 183 December 1993 US Department of Commerce Springfield, VA, USA
13. IEEE Computer Society IEEE Std 1471-2000: IEEE recommended practice for architectural description of software-intensive systems 2000 IEEE Computer Society
14. ITU-T Information technology - open distributed processing - reference model-enterprise language ITU-T Recommendation X911 ISO/IEC 15414 2002 International Telecommunication Union
15. Jonkers H, Lankhorst MM, Buuren R van, Hoppenbrouwers S, Bonsangue M, Torre L van der (2004), Concepts for modelling enterprise architectures, Int J of Cooperative Information Systems (IJCIS), special issue on Architecture in IT (forthcoming).
16. Leeuwen D van, Doest H ter, Lankhorst MM. An integrated workbench for enterprise architecture. 6th international conference on enterprise information systems (ICEIS 2004), Porto, Portugal; 2004.
17. N. Medvidovic, and R.N. Taylor A classification and comparison framework for software architecture description languages IEEE Trans Software Eng 26 1 2000 70 93
18. D.A. Nadler, M.S. Gerstein, R.B. Shaw, and Associates Organizational architecture: designs for changing organizations 1992 Jossey-Bass Publishers San Francisco
19. Object Management Group. Meta object facility (MOF) specification, Version 1.4, April 2002. Full specification formal/2002-04-03, Object Management Group; 2002. http://www.omg.org/docs/formal/02-04-03.pdf
20. Object Management Group. UML profile for enterprise distributed object computting (EDOC). Final Adopted Specification ptc/02-02-05, Object Management Group; 2002. http://www.omg.org/docs/ptc/02-02-05.pdf
21. Object Management Group. XML metadata interchange (XMI), Version 2.0. Specification formal/03-05-02, Object Management Group; May 2003. http://www.omg.org/docs/formal/03-05-02.pdf
22. Object Management Group. Unified modeling language: superstructure. Version 2.0. Final adopted specification ptc/03-08-02, Object Management Group; 2003. http://www.omg.org/docs/ptc/03-08-02.pdf
23. Object Management Group. Unified modeling language: infrastructure. Version 2.0. Final adopted specification ptc/03-09-15; 2003. http://www.omg.org/docs/ptc/03-09-15.pdf.
24. A-W. Scheer Business process engineering: reference models for industrial enterprises 1994 Springer Berlin
25. D. Schefstroem, Broek, and van den. G Tool integration: environments and frameworks 1993 Wiley New York
26. Tyndale-Biscoe S. RM-ODP enterprise language ISO/ITU-T 15414/X911; 2002. http://www.itu.int/itudoc/itu-t/com17/tutorial/81999_pp7.ppt
27. White SA. Business process modeling notation. Working Draft (1.0) August 25, Business Process Management Initiative. (BPMI); 2003.
28. Business Project Team, ebXML Business Process Specification Schema version 1.01, UNICEFACT and OASIS, May 11, 2001.
29. Davenport T, Short JE. The new industrial engineering: Information technology and business process re-design, sloan management review, Summer, 1990, pp. 309-330.
30. Steen MWA, Lankharst MM, Doest Hter, Strating P, lacob ME. Service oriented Enterprise architecture, Chapter 7. In: Stojanovic Z., Dahanayake A(eds), Service oriented Software System engineering: Challenges and Practices, IDEA Group, 2005.