Pregnancy outcome following prenatal diagnosis of an isodicentric X chromosome: First case report

Prenatal Diagnosis

Volumn 22, Issue 11, 2002, Pages 973-975

  Lebbar, Aziza ^a   Viot, G ^a   Szpiro Tapia, S ^b   Baverel, F ^a   Rabineau, D ^a   Dupont, J M ^a  

^a AP/HP Université Paris 5 ^*  (France)

^b LABORATOIRE CERBA   (France)

Author keywords

Isochromosome; Prenatal diagnosis; X chromosome

Indexed keywords

DNA;

AMNIOCENTESIS; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CYTOGENETICS; DNA PROBE; FEMALE; FETUS; FETUS ECHOGRAPHY; HUMAN; HYDRONEPHROSIS; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SECOND TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; X CHROMOSOME; X CHROMOSOME INACTIVATION; ADULT; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC COUNSELING; GENETICS; GESTATIONAL AGE; HIGH RISK PREGNANCY; MATERNAL AGE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; SPECTRAL KARYOTYPING; X CHROMOSOME LINKED DISORDER;

ADULT; AMNIOCENTESIS; CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS; CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN, X; CYTOGENETIC ANALYSIS; DOSAGE COMPENSATION, GENETIC; FEMALE; GENETIC COUNSELING; GENETIC DISEASES, X-LINKED; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMANS; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; MATERNAL AGE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANCY, HIGH-RISK; SPECTRAL KARYOTYPING;

EID: 1842853731     PISSN: 01973851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pd.444     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Barnabei VM, Wilson TA. Johanson AJ, Wyandt HE, Kelly T. 1983. Isodicentric X chromosome in a girl with gonadal dysgenesis. South Med J 76: 249-250.
2. Bonaglia MC, Giorda R, Poggi G, et al. 2000. Inverted duplications are recurrent rearrangements always associated with a distal deletion: Description of a new case involving 2q. Eur J Hum Genet 8: 597-603.
3. Carrasco Juan JL, Otero Gomez A, Vilar Mesa MC, et al. 1989. A rare case of de novo structural rearrangement of X chromosome diagnosed by amniocentesis. Prenat Diagn 9: 443-445.
4. Daniel A, Saville T, Southall DB. 1979. Further dicentric X isochromosomes and deletions, and a new structure i(X)(pter to q2102 to pter). J Med Genet 16: 278-284.
5. Dewald G, Spurbeck JL, Gordon H. 1978. Replication patterns of three isodicentric X chromosomes and an X isochromosome in human lymphocytes. Am J Med Genet 1: 445-460.
6. Floridia G, Piantanida M, Minelli A, et al. 1996. The same molecular mechanism at the maternal meiosis I produces mono- and dicentric 8p duplications. Am J Hum Genet 58: 785-796.
7. Fryns JP, Petit P, Kleczkowska A, van den Berghe H. 1983. Replication and inactivation of an isodicentric X: Presence of an inactive centromere influences the replication patterns. Clin Genet 24: 180-183.
8. Gordon H, Dewald D, Dahl R, Souchek R. 1979. Videodensitometric analysis of normal and abnormal X chromosome by computer. In Genetic Mechanisms of Sexual Development, Vallet HLPJ (ed.). Academic: New York; 331.
9. Hoo JJ, Chao M, Szego K, Rauer M, Echiverri SC, Harris C. 1995. Four new cases of inverted terminal duplication: A modified hypothesis of mechanism of origin. Am J Med Genet 58: 299-304.
10. Jalal SM, Dahl R, Erickson L, Zimmerman D, Lindor N. 1996. Cytogenetic and clinical characteristics of a case involving complete duplication of Xpter → Xq13. J Med Genet 33: 237-239.
11. Jenderny J, Poetsch M, Hoeltzenbein M, Friedrich U, Jauch A. 1998. Detection of a concomitant distal deletion in an inverted duplication of chromosome 3. Is there an overall mechanism for the origin of such duplications/deficiencies? Eur J Hum Genet 6: 439-444.
12. Kotzot D, Martinez MJ, Bagci G, et al. 2000. Parental origin and mechanisms of formation of cytogenetically recognisable de novo direct and inverted duplications. J Med Genet 37: 281-286.
13. Matsuo M, Muroya K, Kosaki K, et al. 1999. Random X-inactivation in a girl with duplication Xp11.21-p21.3: Report of a patient and review of the literature. Am J Med Genet 86: 44-50.
14. Ponzio G, Chiodo F, Messina M, et al. 1987. Non-mosaic isodicentric X-chromosome in a patient with secondary amenorrhoea. Clin Genet 32: 20-23.
15. Portnoi MF, Bouayed-Abdelmoula N, Mirc M, et al. 2000. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of a duplication Xp in a female with an abnormal phenotype and random X inactivation. Clin Genet 58: 116-122.
16. Robertson J, Faed MJ, Lamont MA, Crowder AM. 1982. Isodicentric X chromosome in a moderately tall patient with gonadal dysgenesis: Lack of effect of functional centromere on inactivation pattern. J Med Genet 19: 463-465.
17. Simonic I, Gericke GS. 1996. The enigma of common fragile sites. Hum Genet 97: 524-531.
18. Stankiewicz P, Lupski JR. 2002. Genome architecture, rearrangements and genomic disorders. Trends Genet 18: 74-82.
19. Stetten G, Charity LL, Kasch LM, et al. 1997. A paternally derived inverted duplication of 7q with evidence of a telomeric deletion. Am J Med Genet 68: 76-81.
20. Tagenkamp T, Gruber J, Fisher A. 1978. An apparent translocation of two X chromosomes attached long arm to long arm, with two regions of centromeric heterochromatin 46,X,i dicX(pqqp). Am J Hum Genet 30: 69A.
21. Therman E, Sarto GE, Patau K. 1974. Apparently isodicentric but functionally monocentric X chromosome in man. Am J Hum Genet 26: 83-92.
22. Van Dyke DL, Wiktor A, Roberson JR, Weiss L. 1991. Mental retardation in Turner syndrome. J Pediatr 118: 415-417.
23. Weleber RG, Verma RS, Kimberling WJ, Fieger HG, Jr., Iubs HA. 1976. Duplication-deficiency of the short arm of chromosome 8 following artificial insemination. Ann Genet 19: 241-247.
24. Wolff DJ, Gustashaw KM, Zurcher V, et al. 1997. Deletions in Xq26.3-q27.3 including FMR1 result in a severe phenotype in a male and variable phenotypes in females depending upon the X inactivation pattern. Hum Genet 100: 256-261.