Investigating the Relationship between Learning Style Preferences and Teaching Collaboration Skills and Technology: An Exploratory Study

Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting

Volumn 39, Issue , 2002, Pages 64-73

  Kim, Seung Lye ^a   Sonnenwald, Diane H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1842852459     PISSN: 00447870     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/meet.1450390107     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Aldenderfer, M.S., & Blashfield, R.K. (1984). Cluster Analysis. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications.
2. Baldwin, T. T., & Ford, J. K. (1988). Transfer of training: a review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 41, 63-105.
3. Baldwin, T., & Magjuka, R. (1997). Training as an organizational episode: Pretraining influences on trainee motivation. In K. Ford (Ed.), Improving Training Effectiveness in Work Organizations (pp. 99-127). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
5. Bandura, A. & Beyer, J. (1977). Cognitive processes mediating behavioral change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 125-139.
6. Barling, J. & Beattie, R. (1983). Self-efficacy beliefs and sales performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 5 (Spring), 41-51.
7. Taylor, S.E., Locke E. A., Lee, C., & Gist, M. E. (1984). Type A behavior and faculty research productivity: What are the mechanisms? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 34: 402-418.
8. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Tannenbaum, S.I., Salas, E., & Volpe, C.E. (1995). Defining competencies and establishing team training requirements. In R. A. Guzzo & E. Salas (Eds.), Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
9. Cooley, E. (1994). Training an interdisciplinary team in communication and decision-making skills. Small Group Research, 25(1), 5-25.
10. Gist, M.E. (1986). The effects of self-efficacy training on training task performance. In F. Hoy (Ed.), Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings (pp.250-254). Ada, Ohio: Academy of Management.
11. Gist, M. E. (1989). The influence of training method on self-efficacy and idea generation among managers. Personnel Psychology, 42, 789-805.
12. Gist, M.E., Schwoerer, C., & Rosen, B. (1989). Effects of alternative training methods on self-efficacy and performance in computer software training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 884-891.
13. Hackman, R. J., & Walton, R. E. (1986). Leading groups in organizations. In P. S. Goodman and Associates (Eds.), Designing effective work groups (pp. 72-119). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14. Heinssen, R.K., Glass, C.R. & Knight, L.A. (1987). Assessing computer anxiety: Development and validation of the computer anxiety rating scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 3(1), 49-59.
15. Henry, J. W. & Stone, R. W. (1997). The development and validation of computer self-efficacy and outcome expectancy scales in a non-volitional context. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 29 (4), 519-527.
16. Hill, T., Smith, N.D., & Mann, M.F. (1987). Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies: The case of computers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 542-552.
17. James, W.B. & Gardner, D.L. (1995). Learning styles: Implications for distance learning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EJ 514 356)
18. Johnson, C. (1993). Influences of Gender and Academic Achievement on Learning Preferences of Middle Grade Students. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid South Educational Research Association (November 10-12, 1993).
19. Johnson, C., & Engelhard, G. (1992). Gender, academic achievement, and preferences for cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning among African-American adolescents. Journal of Psychology, 126 (4), 385-392.
20. Johnson, D. & Johnson, R. (1998). Cooperative learning and social interdependence theory. In R. Scott (Ed). Theory and Research on Small Groups. New York: Plenum Press.
21. Klatt, Bruce. (1999). The Ultimate Training Workshop Handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill.
22. Kraiger, K., Ford, J. & Salas, E. (1993). Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 311-328.
23. Lawler, E.E. (1981). Pay and Organizational Development. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
24. Leonard, N.H., Beauvais, L.L, & Scholl, R.W. (1995). A self concept-based model of work motivation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management.
25. Lurey, Jeremy S. (1998). A Study of Best Practices in Designing and Supporting Effective Virtual Teams. Unpublished doctoral dissertation: California School of Professional Psychology.
26. Mathieu, J.E., Tannenbaum, S.I. & Salas, E. (1992). Influences of individual and situational characteristics on measures of training effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 828-847.
27. Mowday, R.T., Porter, L.W., & Steers, R.M. (1982). Employee-organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
28. Noe, R. A., & Schmitt, N. (1986). The influence of trainee attitudes on training effectiveness: Test of a model. Personnel Psychology, 39, 497-523.
29. Noe, R.A. (1986). Trainee attitudes and attributes: Neglected influences of training effectiveness. Academy of Management Review, 11, 736-749.
30. Owens, L., & Barnes, J. (1992). Learning Preference Scales: Handbook and test master set. Melbourne: Australian Council for Education Research Ltd.
31. Owens, L., & Straton, R. (1980). The development of a cooperative, competitive, and individualized learning preference scale for students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 50, 147-161.
32. Raskar, R., Welch, G., Cutts, M., Lake, A., Stesin, L., & Fuchs, H. (1998). The office of the future: A unified approach to image-based modeling and spatially immersive displays. ACM Computer Graphics Proceedings.
33. Rosen, L.D. & Weil, M.L. (1994). Computer Anxiety: A cross-cultural comparison of university students in ten countries. Computers in Human Behaviors, 8(1), 45-64.
34. Schunk, D. (1996). Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
35. Simonin, B. L. (1997). The importance of collaborative know-how: An empirical test of the learning organization. Academy of Management Journal, 40(5), 1150-1174.
36. Smith, R.M. (1982). Learning how to learn: Applied theory for adults. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
37. Sonnenwald, D. H. (1995). Contested collaboration: a descriptive model of intergroup communication in information system design. Information Processing and Management, 31(6), 859-877.
38. Sonnenwald, D.H. (1999). Challenges in Corporate and University R&D Collaboration. INFORMS (Institute for Operations Research and Management Science) Annual Conference, Cincinnati, OH.
39. Sonnenwald, D.H., & Pierce, K. (2000). Information behavior in dynamic group work contexts: Interwoven situational awareness, dense social networks and contested collaboration. Information Processing & Management, 36(3), 461-479.
40. Sonnenwald, D.H., Bergquist, R., Maglaughlin, K.A., Kupstas-Soo, E., & Whitton, M. (2001). Designing to support collaborative scientific research across distances: The nanoManipulator example. In E. Churchill, D. Snowdon, A. Munro (Eds.), Collaborative Virtual Environments (pp. 202-224). London: Springer Verlag.
41. Stevens, Michael J., & Campion, Michael A. (1994). The knowledge, skill, and ability requirement for teamwork: implications for human resource management. Journal of Management, 20(2), 503-530.
42. Tannenbaum, S.I., Mathieu, J.E., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J.A. (1991). Meeting trainees' expectations of commitment, self-efficacy, and motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(6), 759-769.
43. Taylor, M.S., Locke, E.A., Lee, C., & Gist, M.E. (1984). Type A behavior and faculty research productivity: What are the mechanisms? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 402-418.