Constrained MIMO dynamic discrete-time modeling exploiting optimal experimental design

Journal of Process Control

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 671-683

  Rollins, Derrick K ^a   Bhandari, Nidhi ^a  

^a Iowa State University of Science and Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

ARMAX; Block oriented modeling; Dynamic modeling; Hammerstein system; NARMAX; Predictive modeling; Wiener system

Indexed keywords

CONSTRAINT THEORY; DATA REDUCTION; DIGITAL CONTROL SYSTEMS; NONLINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS; OPTIMAL CONTROL SYSTEMS; PREDICTIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS; PROCESS CONTROL; STATISTICAL METHODS;

ARMAX; BLOCK-ORIENTED MODELING; DYNAMIC MODELING; HAMMERSTEIN SYSTEMS; NARMAX; PREDICTIVE MODELING; WIENER SYSTEMS;

DISCRETE TIME CONTROL SYSTEMS;

EID: 1842843137     PISSN: 09591524     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2003.10.004     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Su H., McAvoy T.J. Integration of multilayer perceptron networks and linear dynamic models: a Hammerstein modeling approach. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 32:1993;1927-1936.
2. Patwardhan R.S., Lakshminarayanan S., Shah S.L. Constrained nonlinear MPC using Hammerstein and Wiener models: PLS framework. AIChE Journal. 44:1998;1611-1622.
3. Eskinat E., Johnson S.H., Luyben W.L. Use of Hammerstein models in identification of nonlinear systems. AIChE Journal. 37(2):1991;255-268.
4. Kalafatis A., Arifin N., Wang L., Cluett W.L. A new approach to the identification of pH processes based on the Wiener model. Chemical Engineering Science. 50:1995;3693-3701.
5. Seinfeld J.H., Lapidus L. Mathematical Methods in Chemical Engineering, vol. 3: Process Modeling, Estimation, and Identification. 1974;Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
6. Pearson R.K., Ogunnaike B.A. Nonlinear process identification. Nonlinear Process Control. 1997;20-23 Prentice-Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River.
7. Chen V.C.P., Rollins D.K. Issues regarding artificial neural network modeling for reactors and fermenters. Journal of Bioprocess Engineering. 20:2000;85.
8. Rollins D.K., Smith P., Liang J. Accurate simplistic predictive modeling of nonlinear dynamic processes. ISA Transactions. 36:1998;293-303.
9. N. Bhandari, D.K. Rollins, A continuous-time MIMO Wiener modeling method. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, in press.
10. Pearson R.K., Pottmann M. Gray-box identification of block-oriented nonlinear models. Journal of Process Control. 10:2000;301-315.
11. D.K. Rollins, N. Bhandari, L. Pacheco, Experimental designs that maximize information for nonlinear dynamic processes, in: Proceedings of FOCAPO, Coral Springs, FL, 2003, pp. 463-466.
12. Rollins D.K., Bhandari N., Bassily A.M., Colver G.M., Chin S. A continuous-time nonlinear dynamic predictive modeling method for Hammerstein processes. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 42:2003;861-872.
13. Haber R., Unbehauen H. Structure identification of nonlinear dynamic systems - a survey on input/output approaches. Automatica. 26:1990;651-677.
14. Seborg D.E., Edgar T.F., Mellichamp D.A. Process Dynamics and Control. 1989;John Wiley and Sons, New York. pp. 549-589.
15. Akiti T. Jr., Bircumshaw L.D., Eckert R.E. Sequential design including initial experimental runs for a kinetic study of propylene oxidation. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering. 75:1997;238-244.
16. Versyck K.J., Claes J.E., Van-Impe J.F. Practical identification of unstructured growth kinetics by application of optimal experimental design. Biotechnology Progress. 13:1997;524-531.
17. Lanouette R., Valade J.L. Optimization of an alkaline peroxide interstage treatment of jack pine (Pinus banksiana Lamb.) using a D-optimal design. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering. 75:1997;70-78.
18. Neter J., Wasserman W., Kutner M.H. Applied Linear Regression Models. 1983;Richard D. Irwin, Inc, Homewood, IL.
19. Montgomery D.C. Design and Analysis of Experiments. 1984;John Wiley and Sons, New York.
20. Bates D.M., Watts D.G. Nonlinear Regression Analysis and Its Applications. 1988;John Wiley and Sons, New York.