Practical identification of unstructured growth kinetics by application of optimal experimental design

Biotechnology Progress

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 524-531

  Versyck, Karina J ^a   Claes, Johan E ^a   Van Impe, Jan F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; BIOREACTORS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SUBSTRATES;

E CRITERION; HALDANE MODEL; MONOD MODEL;

GROWTH KINETICS;

EID: 0031239967     PISSN: 87567938     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/bp970080j     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Baltes, M.; Schneider, R.; Sturm, C.; Reuss, M. Optimal Experimental Design for Parameter Estimation in Unstructured Growth Models. Biotechnol. Prog. 1994, 10, 480-488.
2. Chapell, M.; Godfrey, K. Structural Identifiability of Nonlinear Systems: Application to a Batch Reactor. In Identification and system parameter estimation; Bányász, Cs., Keviczky, L., Eds.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, U.K., 1991; pp 492-497.
3. Cooney, M.; McDonald, K. Optimal Dynamic Experiments for Bioreactor Model Discrimination. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1995, 43, 826-837.
4. Godfrey, K.; DiStefano, J. Identifiability of Model Parameters. In Preprints Identification and system parameter estimation; Barker, H., Young, P., Eds.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, U.K., 1985; pp 89-114.
5. Holmberg, A. On the Practical Identifiability of Microbial Growth Models Incorporating Michaelis-Menten Type Nonlinearities. Math. Biosci. 1982, 62, 23-43.
6. Holmberg A. On the Accuracy of Estimating the Parameters of Models Containing Michaelis-Menten Nonlinearities. In Modelling and Data Analysis in Biotechnology and Medical Engineering; North-Holland: Amsterdam, 1983; pp 199-208.
7. Mehra R. Optimal Input Signal for Parameter Estimation in Dynamic Systems-Survey and New Results. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 1974, 19 (6), 753-768.
8. Munack A. Optimal Feeding Strategy for Identification of Monod-type Models by Fed-batch Experiments. In Computer Applications in Fermentation Technology Modelling and Control of Biotechnological Processes; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1989; pp 195-204.
9. Munack A. Some Improvements in the Identification of Bioprocesses. In Modeling and Control of Biotechnical Processes; Pergamon Press: Oxford, U.K., 1991; pp 89-94.
10. Munack A.; Posten C. Design of Optimal Dynamical Experiments for Parameter Estimation, In Proceedings of the American Control Conference ACC89; Pittsburgh, PA, 1989; pp 2011-2016.
11. Nihtilä, M.; Virkkunen, J. Practical Identifiability of Growth and Substrate Consumption Models. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1977, 19, 1831-1850.
12. Pohjanpalo, H. System Identifiability, based on the Power Series Expansion of the Solution. Math. Biosci. 1978, 41, 21-33.
13. Van Impe, J. Modeling and optimal adaptive control of biotechnological processes. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium, 1993.
14. Van Impe, J.; Bastin, G. Optimal Adaptive Control of Fed-batch Fermentation Processes. Control Eng. Practice 1995, 3 (7), 939-954.
15. Van Impe, J.; Claes, J.; Bastin, G. Optimal Feed Rate Profiles for Combined Bioprocess Modeling and Optimization. In Proceedings of the European Control Conference ECC95; Isidori, A., Bittanti, S., Mosca, E., De Luca, A., Di Benedetto, M. D., Oriolo, G., Eds.; Roma, Italy, 1995; Vol. 4 (2), pp 3510-3515.
16. Walter, E.; Pronzato, L. Qualitative and Quantitative Experiment Design for Phenomenological Models - A Survey. Automatica 1990, 26 (2), 195-213.