Writing about patients: II. Patients' reading about themselves and their analysts' perceptions of its effect

Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 101-123

  Kantrowitz, Judy L ^a,b,c  

^a Boston Psychoanalytic Institute   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFIDENTIALITY; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOANALYSIS; REVIEW;

EID: 1842839706     PISSN: 00030651     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00030651040520011201     Document Type: Review

References (9)

1. CASEMENT, P. (1985). On Learning from the Patient. London: Tavistock.
2. CRASTNOPOL, M. (1999). The analyst's professional self as a third influence on the dyad: When the analyst writes about the treatment. Psychoanalytic Dialogues 9: 445-470.
3. GABBARD, G. (2000). Disguise or consent? Problems and recommendations concerning the publication and presentation of clinical material. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 81:1071-1086.
4. LAFARGE, L. (2000). Interpretation and containment. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 81:67-84.
5. LIPTON, E.L. (1991). The analyst's use of clinical data and other issues of confidentiality. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 39:967-985.
6. PERSON, E.S. (1983). Women in therapy: Therapist gender as a variable. International Review of Psychoanalysis 10:193-204.
7. RINGSTROM, P. (1998). Therapeutic impasses in contemporary psychoanalytic treatment: Revisiting the double-bind hypothesis. Psychoanalytic Dialogues 8:297-315.
8. STEIN, M.H. (1981). The unobjectionable part of the transference. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 29:869-892.
9. STOLLER, R.J. (1988). Patients' responses to their own case report. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 36:371-391.