Therapeutic impasses in contemporary psychoanalytic treatment revisiting the double bind hypothesis

Psychoanalytic Dialogues

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 297-315

  Ringstrom, Philip A ^a,b,c  

^a INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY PSYCHOANALYSIS   (United States)

^b California Inst for Clin Soc Work   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032347262     PISSN: 10481885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10481889809539249     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Abeles, G. (1976), Researching the unresearchable. In: Double Bind: The Foundation of the Communicational Approach to the Family, ed. C. E. Sluzki & D. C. Ransom. New York: Grune & Stratton
2. Aron, L. (1991), The patient's experience of the analyst's subjectivity, Psychoanal. Dial., 1:29-51.
3. _ (1996), A Meeting of Minds: Mutuality in Psychoanalysis, Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
4. Bacal, H. (1995), The essence of Kohut's work and progress of self psychology. Psychoanal Dial., 5:353-373.
5. _ & Newman, K., (1990), Theories of Object Relations: Bridges to Self Psychology. New York: Columbia University Press.
6. _ & Thomson, P. (1996), The psychoanalyst's selfobject needs and the effect of their frustration on the treatment: A new view of countertransference. In: Basic Ideas Reconsidered Progress in Self Psychology, Vol. 12, ed. A. Goldberg. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press, pp. 17-54.
7. Balint, M. (1969), The Basic Fault: Therapeutic Aspects of Regression. London: Tavistock.
8. Bateson, G., Jackson, D.D., Haley, J. & Weakland, J. (1956), Towards a theory of schizophrenia. Behav. Sci., 1:251-264.
9. Benjamin, J. (1988), The Bonds of Love. New York: Pantheon Books.
10. _ (1992), Recognition and destruction: An outline of intersubjectivity. In: Relational Perspectives in Psychoanalysis, ed. N. Skolnick & S. Warshaw. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press, pp. 43-60.
11. _ (1995), Like Subjects, Love Objects: Essays on Recognition and Sexual Difference. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
12. Bollas, C. (1987), The Shadow of the Object: Psychoanalysis of the Unthought Known. New York: Columbia University Press.
13. Bromberg, P. (1994), "Speak that I may see you": Some reflections on dissociation, reality, and psychoanalytic listening. Psychoanal. Dial., 4:517-547.
14. _ (1995) Resistance, and object-usage, and human relatedness. Contemp. Psychoanal., 31:173-191.
15. Davies, J. (1996), The Analyst's Parental Subjectivity: Gender, Opportunity, and Limitations. Presented at Division of Psychoanalysis (39) of American Psychological Association. New York City, Spring.
16. Ehrenberg, D. (1992), The Intimate Edge. New York: Norton.
17. Ghent, E. (1992), Paradox and process. Psychoanal. Dial., 2:135-159.
18. Greenberg, J. (1986), Theoretical models and the analyst's neutrality. Contemp. Psychoanal., 22:87-106.
19. Greenberg, J. & Mitchell, S. (1983), Object Relations in Psychoanalytic Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Haley, J. (1976), Development of a theory: A history of a research project. In: Double Bind: The Foundation of the Communicational Approach to the Family, ed. C. Sluzki & D. Ransom. New York: Grune & Stratton, pp. 59-104.
21. Heimann, P. (1950), On countertransference. Internat J. Psycho-Anal-, 31:81-84.
22. Huffman, I. (1994), Dialectical thinking and therapeutic action in the psychoanalytic process. Psychoanal. Quart., 63:187-218.
23. Kernberg, O. (1965), Notes on countertransference. Internat. J. Psycho-Anal., 13: 38-56.
24. Lichtenberg, J. (1989), Psychoanalysis and Motivation. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
25. McLaughlin, J. (1992), Clinical and theoretical aspects of enactment. J. Amer. Psychoanal Assn., 40:595-614.
26. Mitchell, S. (1993), Hope and Dread in Psychoanalysis. New York: Basic Books.
27. Natterson, J. (1991), Beyond Countertransference: The Therapist's Subjectivity in the Therapeutic Process. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
28. Ogden, T. (1994), Subjects of Analysis. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
29. Orange, D. (1995), Emotional Understanding: Studies in Psychoanalytic Epistemology. New York: Guilford.
30. Rabkin, R. (1976), Critique of the clinical use of the double bind hypothesis. In: Double Bind: The Foundation of the Communicational Approach to the Family, ed. C. Sluzki & D. Ransom. New York: Grune & Stratton.
31. Racker, H. (1968), Transference and Countertransference. New York: International Universities Press.
32. Renik, O. (1995), The ideal of the anonymous analyst and the problems of self-disclosure. Psychoanal. Quart., 62:553-571.
33. Shane, M. & Shane, E. (1990), The struggle for otherhood: Implications for development in adulthood. In: Advances in Development, ed. C. Calorusso & R. Nemiroff. New York: Plenum Press.
34. Slavin, M. & Kriegman, D. (1992) The Adaptive Design of the Human Psyche: Psychoanalysis, Evolutionary Biology, and the Therapeutic Process. New York: Guilford.
35. Sluzki, C. & Ransom, D. (1976), Comments on Gina Abeles's Review. In: Double Bind: The Foundation of the Communicational Approach to the Family, ed. C. Sluzki & D. Ranson. New York: Grune & Stratton, pp. 151-164.
36. Stern, S. (1994), Needed relationships and repeated relationships: An integrated relational perspective. Psychoanal. Dial., 4:317-346.
37. Stolorow, R. (1995), An intersubjective view of self psychology. Psychoanal. Dial., 5:393-399.
38. _ & Atwood, G. (1992), Contexts of Being: The Intersubjective Foundation of Psychological Life. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
39. _ Brandchaft, B., & Atwood, G. (1987), Psychoanalytic Treatment: An Intersubjective Approach. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
40. Suler, J. (1989), Paradox in psychological transformations: The Zen koan and psychotherapy. Psychologia. 32:221-229.
41. Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J. H. & Jackson, D. D. (1967), Pragmatics of Human Communication. New York: Norton.
42. Whitehead, A. & Russell, B. (1910), Principia Mathematica, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.