Measuring Secrecy: A Cost of the Patent System Revealed

Journal of Legal Studies

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 59-84

  Grushcow, Jeremy M ^a  

^a Kirkland and Ellis LLP ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1842815682     PISSN: 00472530     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/381288     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Association of University Technology Managers, Inc. (AUTM). 1999. AUTM Licensing Survey: FY 1999. Survey Summary, http://www.autm.net/surveys/99/ survey99A.pdf (visited January 20, 2004).
2. Blumenthal, D., E. G. Campbell, M. S. Anderson, N. Causino, and K. S. Louis. 1997. Withholding Research Results in Academic Life Science: Evidence from a National Survey of Faculty. Journal of the American Medical Association 277:1224-28.
3. Campbell, Eric G., Brian R. Clarridge, Manjunsha Gokhale, Lauren Birenbaum, Stephen Hilgartner, Neil A. Holtzman, and David Blumenthal. 2002. Data Withholding in Academic Genetics: Evidence from a National Survey. Journal of the American Medical Association 287:473-80.
4. Cockburn, lain M., and Rebecca M. Henderson. 2001. Publicly Funded Science and the Productivity of the Pharmaceutical Industry. NBER Innovation Policy and the Economy 1:1-34.
5. Eisenberg, Rebecca S. 1987. Proprietary Rights and the Norms of Science in Biotechnology Research. Yale Law Journal 97:177-231.
6. _. 1989. Patents and the Progress of Science: Exclusive Rights and Experimental Use. University of Chicago Law Review 56:1017-86.
7. _. 1996. Public Research and Private Development: Patents and Technology Transfer in Government-Sponsored Research. Virginia Law Review 82: 1663-1727.
8. Ginsparg, Paul. 1999. Some Comments on e-biosci. HMS Beagle: The BioMedNet Magazine 61:5. http://news.bmn.com/hmsbeagle/61/viewpts/page5 (visited July 25, 2001).
9. Heller, Michael A., and Rebecca S. Eisenberg. 1998. Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research. Science 280:698-701.
10. Kitch, Edmund W. 1977. The Nature and Function of the Patent System. Journal of Law and Economics 20:265-90.
11. Murphy, Sean D. 2001. Biotechnology and International Law. Harvard International Law Journal 42:47-139.
12. National Science Board. 2000. Science and Engineering Indicators - 2000. Arlington, Va.: National Science Foundation.
13. Palladino, Donald R. 1999. Comment: The Publication Bar: How Disclosing an Invention to Others Can Jeopardize Potential Patent Rights. Duquesne University Law Review 37:353-70.
14. Patent Office (UK). 2002. UK Consultation on Patents Grace Periods. http://www.patent.gov.uk/about/consultations/grace/index.htm (visited October 25, 2003).
15. Pierotti, Neil P. 2002. Does Internet Information Count as a Printed Publication? IDEA 42:249-78.
16. Rai, Arti Kaur. 1999. Regulating Scientific Research: Intellectual Property Rights and the Norms of Science. Northwestern University Law Review 94:77-152.
17. Straheilevitz, Lior Jacob. 2003. Charismatic Code, Social Norms, and the Emergence of Cooperation on the File-Swapping Networks. John M. Olin Law and Economics Working Paper No. 162, 2d series. University of Chicago Law School. http://www.law.uchicago.edu/Lawecon/index.html.
18. United States Congress. Office of Technology Assessment. 1995. Federal Technology Transfer and the Human Genome Project. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
19. United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). 2002. Table of Issue Years and Patent Numbers, for Patents Issued since 1836. http://www.uspto.gov/ web/offices/ac/ido/oeip/taf/issuyear.htm (visited November 25, 2002).