Hullability of oat varieties and its determination using a laboratory dehuller

Journal of Agricultural Science

Volumn 138, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 185-191

  Browne, R A ^a,b   White, E M ^a,c   Burke, J I ^b  

^a QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

^b TEAGASC   (Ireland)

^c AGRI FOOD AND BIOSCIENCES INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CEREAL; FOOD PROCESSING;

AVENA;

EID: 1842797978     PISSN: 00218596     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0021859601001769     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. COWAN, A. A., VALENTINE, J., JONES, D. M. & MIDDLETON, B. T. (2001). Assessment of Potential Varieties of Winter Oats for Improved Economic Competitiveness and End-use Characteristics (1998-2000). Research Report No. 241. London: Home-Grown Cereals Authority.
2. DOEHLERT, D. C., MCMULLEN, M. S. & BAUMANN, R. R. (1999). Factors affecting groat percentage in oat. Crop Science 39, 1858-1865.
3. GANßMANN, W. & VORWERCK, K. (1995). Oat milling, processing and storage. In The Oat Crop: Production and Utilization (Ed. R. W. Welch), pp. 369-408. London: Chapman and Hall.
4. HUTCHINSON, J. B., KENT, N. L. & MARTIN, H. F. (1952). The kernel content of oats: variation in percentage kernel content and 1000 kernel weight within the variety. Journal of the National Institute of Agricultural Botany 6, 149-160.
5. KENT, N. L. & EVERS, A. D. (1994). Technology of Cereals. London: Pergamon.
6. VALENTINE, J., JONES, D. M., GRIFFITHS, T. E. R. & MIDDLETON, B. T. (2000). Evaluation of Potential Varieties of Winter Oats for Improved Economic Competitiveness. Research Report No. 232. London : Home-Grown Cereals Authority.
7. WHITE, E. M., MCGAREL, A. S. L. & ARDIES, H. (2000). A comparison of manual and mechanically determined kernel contents in oat varieties. Plant Varieties and Seeds 13, 45-59.
8. YOUNGS, V. L. & SHANDS, H. L. (1974). Variation in oat kernel characteristics within the panicle. Crop Science 14, 578-580.