Analysis of myoglobin adsorption to Cu(II)-IDA and Ni(II)-IDA functionalized langmuir monolayers by grazing incidence neutron and X-ray techniques

Langmuir

Volumn 20, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 2819-2829

  Kent, M S ^a   Yim, H ^a   Sasaki, D Y ^a   Satija, S ^b   Majewski, J ^c   Gog, T ^d  

^a SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^d ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADSORPTION; AMINO ACIDS; COPPER; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; LIPIDS; MONOLAYERS; NEUTRON DIFFRACTION; NICKEL; POSITIVE IONS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; VOLUME FRACTION; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

BINDING INTERACTION; GRAZING INCIDENCE X RAY DIFFRACTION; HISTIDINE; LANGMUIR MONOLAYERS; METAL CHELATING LIPID; MYOGLOBIN;

PROTEINS;

COPPER; DIGLYCINE; HISTIDINE; IMINO ACID; MYOGLOBIN; NICKEL; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUND;

ADSORPTION; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; METHODOLOGY; NEUTRON DIFFRACTION; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; SURFACE PROPERTY; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

ADSORPTION; COPPER; HISTIDINE; IMINO ACIDS; MYOGLOBIN; NEUTRON DIFFRACTION; NICKEL; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; SURFACE PROPERTIES; X-RAY DIFFRACTION;

EID: 1842791760     PISSN: 07437463     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/la036207y     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Smeller, L.; Rubens, P.; Heremans, K. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 3816.
2. Bergers, J. J.; Vingerhoeds, M. H.; van Bloois, L.; Herron, J. N.; Janssen, L. H. M.; Fischer, M. J. E.; Crommelin, D. J. A. Biochemistry 1993, 32, 4641.
3. Puett, D. J. Biol. Chem. 1973, 248, 4623.
4. Fandrich, M.; Fletcher, M. A.; Dobson, C. M. Nature 2001, 410, 165.
5. Haas, H.; Brezesinski, G.; Mohwald, H. Biophys. J. 1995, 68, 312.
6. Lenne, P. F.; Berge, B.; Renault, A.; Zakri, C.; Venien-Bryan, C.; Courty, S.; Balavoine, F.; Bergsma-Schutter, W.; Brisson, A.; Grubel, G.; Boudet, N.; Konovalov, O.; Legrand, J. F. Biophys. J. 2000, 79, 496.
7. Courty, S.; Lebeau, L.; Martel, L.; Lenne, P. F.; Balavoine, F.; Dischert, W.; Konovalov, O.; Mioskowski, C.; legrand, J. F.; Venien-Bryan, C. Langmuir 2002, 18, 9502.
8. Venien-Bryan, C.; Lenne, P. F.; Zakri, C.; Renault, A.; Brisson, A.; Legrand, J. F.; Berge, B. Biophys. J. 1998, 74, 2649.
9. Dietrich, C.; Boscheinen, O.; Scharf, K. D.; Schmitt, L.; Tampe, R. Biochemistry 1996, 35, 1100.
10. Maloney, K. M.; Shnek, D. R.; Sasaki, D. Y.; Arnold, F. H. Chem. Biol. 1996, 3, 185.
11. Pack, D. W.; Ng, K.; Maloney, K. M.; Arnold, F. H. Supramol. Sci. 1997, 4, 3.
12. Frey, W.; William, R.; Schief, J.; Pack, D. W.; Chen, C.-T.; Chilkoti, A.; Stayton, P.; Vogel, V.; Arnold, F. H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1996, 93, 4937.
13. Wang, S.-W.; Robertson, C.; Gast, A.; Koppenol, S.; Edwards, T.; Vogel, V.; Stayton, P. Langmuir 2000, 16, 5199.
14. Shnek, D. R.; Pack, D. W.; Sasaki, D. Y.; Arnold, F. H. Langmuir 1994, 10, 2382.
15. Arnold, F. H. Biotechnology 1991, 9, 151.
16. Mallik, S.; Johnson, R. D.; Arnold, F. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 8902.
17. Ng, K.; Pack, D. W.; Sasaki, D. Y.; Arnold, F. H. Langmuir 1995, 11, 4048.
18. Bischler, N.; Balavoine, F.; Milkereit, P.; Tschochner, H.; Mioskowski, C.; Schultz, P. Biophys. J. 1998, 74, 1522.
19. Wilson-Kubalek, E. M.; Brown, R. E.; Celia, H.; Milligan, R. A. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 1998, 95, 8040.
20. Sulkowski, E. BioEssays 1989, 10, 170.
21. The structure of myoglobin was obtained from the protein data bank: 5MBN.
22. Wuenschell, G. E.; Wen, E.; Todd, R.; Shnek, D.; Arnold, F. H. J. Chromatogr. 1991, 543, 345.
23. Sinha, P. C.; Saxena, V. K.; Nigam, N. B.; Srivastava, M. N. Indian J. Chem. 1989, 28A, 335.
24. Taunton, H. J.; Toprakcioglu, C.; Fetters, L. J.; Klein, J. Nature 1998, 332, 712.
25. Taunton, H. J.; Toprakcioglu, C.; Fetters, L. J.; Klein, J. Macromolecules 1990, 23, 571.
26. Weast, R. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 61st ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, 1980.
27. Losche, M.; Piepenstock, M.; Diederich, A.; Grunewald, T.; Kjaer, K.; Vaknin, D. Biophys. J. 1993, 65, 2160.
28. Lee, K. Y. C.; Majewski, J.; Kuhl, T.; Howes, P.; Kjaer, K.; Lipp, M.; Waring, A. J.; Zasadzinski, J. A.; Smith, G. S. Biophys. J. 2001, 81, 572.
29. Naumann, C.; Dietrich, C.; Behrisch, A.; Bayerl, T.; Schleicher, M.; Bucknall, D.; Sackman, E. Biophys. J. 1996, 71, 811.
30. Maierhofer, A. P.; Bucknall, D. G.; Bayerl, T. M. Biophys. J. 2000, 79, 1428.
31. Certain trade names and company products are identified in order to specify adequately the experimental procedure. In no case does such identification imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor does it imply that the products are necessarily the best for the purpose.
32. Russell, T. P. Mater. Sci. Rep. 1990, 5, 171.
33. Penfold, J.; Thomas, R. K. J. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 1990, 2, 1369.
34. Ishiguro, R., Sasaki, D. Y.; Pacheco, C.; Kurihara, K. Colloids Surf. 1999, 146, 329.
35. Als-Nielsen, J.; Kjaer, K. X-ray reflectivity and diffraction studies of liquid surfaces and surfactant monolayers. In The Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute, Phase Transitions in Soft Condensed Matter, Geilo, Norway, April 4-14, 1989, Plenum Publishing Corp.: New York.
36. Kjaer, K. Physica B 1994, 98, 100.
37. Eisenberger, P.; Marra, W. C. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1981, 46, 1081.
38. Jensen, T. R.; Kjaer, K. Structural properties and interactions of thin films at the air-liquid interface explored by synchrotron X-ray scattering. In Novel methods to study interfacial layers; Miller, R., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2001, Vol. 11, p 205.
39. Guinier, A. X-ray Diffraction, Freeman: San Francisco, 1963
40. In our notation, {1, 0} indicates six coinciding reflections {h, k} = {(1, 0), (0, 1), (1, 1), (1, 0), (0, 1), (1, 1)}.
41. Kent, M. S.; Yim, H.; Sasaki, D.; Majewski, J.; Smith, G. S.; Shin, K.; Satija, S.; Ocko, B. M. Langmuir 2002, 18, 3754. Note that the amino acid volume fraction calculated in that paper assumed a melt density of 0.80 for myoglobin. Since the melt density of myoglobin was determined to be 1.43 from the present data, the values in Figure 4 of the above paper should be multiplied by 1.43/0.80, giving a maximum value of 0.20 at the surface rather than 0.11. This value is still far less than 0.55 ± 0.05 as observed in the present work and is also less than the value of 0.44 expected for full coverage in the native state.
42. 3 was calculated.
43. A is Avogadro's number.
44. de Jongh, H. H. J.; Goormaghtigh, E.; Ruysschaert, J.-M. Biochemistry 1997, 36, 13603.
45. Vineyard, G. Phys. Rev. B 1982, 26, 4146.