Spatial reference memory in GluR-A-deficient mice using a novel hippocampal-dependent paddling pool escape task

Hippocampus

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 216-223

  Schmitt, W B ^a   Deacon, R M J ^a   Reisel, D ^a   Sprengel, R ^b   Seeburg, P H ^b   Rawlins, J N P ^a   Bannerman, David M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH   (Germany)

Author keywords

AMPA receptors; Learning; Long term potentiation; Synaptic plasticity; Watermaze

Indexed keywords

GLUTAMATE RECEPTOR 1;

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HIPPOCAMPUS; KNOCKOUT MOUSE; LATENT PERIOD; LONG TERM POTENTIATION; MALE; MAZE TEST; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHORT TERM MEMORY; SPATIAL MEMORY; SWIMMING POOL; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRANSGENIC MOUSE;

ANIMALS; AVOIDANCE LEARNING; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; ENVIRONMENT; HIPPOCAMPUS; MALE; MEMORY; MICE; MICE, KNOCKOUT; RECEPTORS, AMPA; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 1842779962     PISSN: 10509631     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hipo.10168     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bannerman DM, Deacon RMJ, Seeburg PH, Rawlins JNP. 2003. GluR-A deficient mice display normal acquisition of a hippocampal-dependent spatial reference memory task but are impaired during spatial reversal. Behav Neurosci 117:866-870.
2. Bannerman DM, Good MA, Butcher SP, Ramsay M, Morris RGM. 1995a. Distinct components of spatial learning revealed by prior training and NMDA receptor blockade. Nature 378:182-186.
3. Bannerman DM, Good MA, Butcher SP, Ramsay M, Morris RGM. 1995b. NMDA receptors, long-term potentiation and spatial learning. Brain Res Assoc Abs 12:107.
4. Barnes CA. 1979. Memory deficits associated with senescence: a neurophysiological and behavioral study in the rat. J Comp Physiol Psychol 93:74-104.
5. Bliss TVP, Lømo T. 1973. Long-lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of anaesthetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant path. J Physiol (Lond) 232:331-356.
6. Chen C, Tonegawa S. 1997. Molecular genetic analysis of synaptic plasticity, activity-dependent neural development, learning, and memory in the mammalian brain. Annu Rev Neurosci 20:157-184.
7. Contet C, Rawlins JNP, Deacon RMJ. 2002. A comparison of 129S2/SvHsd and C57BL/6JolaHsd mice on a test battery assessing sensorimotor, affective and cognitive behaviours: implications for the study of genetically modified mice. Behav Brain Res 124:33-46.
8. Deacon RMJ, Rawlins JNP. 2002. Learning impairments of hippocampal lesioned mice in a paddling pool. Behav Neurosci 116:472-478.
9. Good MA, Bannerman DM. 1997. Differential effects of ibotenic acid lesions of the hippocampus and blockade of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor-dependent long-term potentiation on contextual processing in rats. Behav Neurosci 111:1171-1183.
10. Hebb DO. 1949. The organisation of behaviour. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
11. Hoffman D, Sprengel R, Sakmann B. 2002. Molecular dissection of associative plasticity in CA1 hippocampal pyramidal neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:7740-7745.
12. Honig WK. 1978. Studies of working memory in the pigeon. In: Hulse SH, Fowler HF, Honig WK, editors. Cognitive processes in animal behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates. p 211-248.
13. Huerta PT, Scearce KA, Farris SM, Empson RM, Prusky GT. 1996. Preservation of spatial learning in fyn tyrosine kinase knockout mice. NeuroReport 7:1685-1689.
14. Lee H-K, Barbarosie M, Kameyama K, Bear MF, Huganir RL. 2000. Regulation of distinct AMPA receptor phosphorylation sites during bidirectional synaptic plasticity. Nature 405:955-959.
15. Magee JC, Johnston D. 1997. A synaptically controlled, associative signal for Hebbian plasticity in hippocampal neurons. Science 275:209-213.
16. Martin SJ, Grimwood PD, Morris RGM. 2000. Synaptic plasticity and memory: an evaluation of the hypothesis. Annu Rev Neurosci 23: 649-711.
17. Martin SJ, Morris RGM. 2002. New life in an old idea: the synaptic plasticity and memory hypothesis revisited. Hippocampus 12:609-636.
18. Meiri N, Sun M-K, Segal Z, Alkon DL. 1998. Memory and long-term potentiation (LTP) dissociated: normal spatial memory despite CA1 LTP elimination with Kv1.4 antisense. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 15037-15042.
19. Morris RGM. 1981. Spatial localisation does not depend on the presence of local cues. Learn Motiv 12:239-269.
20. Morris RGM. 1984. Developments of a watermaze procedure for studying spatial learning in the rat. J Neurosci Methods 11:47-60.
21. Morris RGM, Anderson E, Lynch GS, Baudry M. 1986. Selective impairment of learning and blockade of long-term potentiation by an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, AP5. Nature 319:774-776.
22. Morris RGM, Davis S, Butcher SP. 1990. Hippocampal. synaptic plasticity and NMDA receptors: a role in information storage? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 329:187-204.
23. Okabe S, Collin C, Auerbach JM, Meiri N, Bengzon J, Kennedy MB, Segal M, McKay RDG. 1998. Hippocampal synaptic plasticity in mice overexpressing an embryonic subunit of the NMDA receptor. J Neurosci 18:4177-4188.
24. O'Keefe J, Nadel L. 1978. The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Olton DS, Becker JT, Handelmann E. 1979. Hippocampus, space and memory. Behav Brain Sci 2:313-366.
26. Paulsen O, Sejnowski TJ. 2000. Natural patterns of activity and long-term synaptic plasticity. Curr Opin Neurobiol 10:172-179.
27. Pike FG, Meredith RM, Olding AW, Paulsen O. 1999. Post-synaptic bursting is essential for "Hebbian" induction of associative long-term potentiation at excitatory synapses in the rat hippocampus. J Physiol (Lond) 518:571-576.
28. Reisel D, Bannerman DM, Schmitt WB, Deacon RMJ, Flint J, Borchardt T, Seeburg PH, Rawlins JNP. 2002. Spatial memory dissociations in mice lacking GluR1. Nature Neurosci 5:868-873.
29. Rogers DC, Jones DNC, Nelson PR, Jones CM, Quilter CA, Robinson TL, Hagan JJ. 1999. Use of SHIRPA and discriminant analysis to characterise marked differences in the behavioural phenotype of six inbred mouse strains. Behav Brain Res 105:207-217.
30. Saucier D, Cain DP. 1995. Spatial learning without NMDA receptor-dependent long-term potentiation. Nature 378, 186-189.
31. Tang YP, Shimizu E, Dube G, Rampon C, Kerchner G, Zhuo M, Liu G, Tsien JZ. 1999. Genetic enhancement of learning and memory in mice. Nature 401:63-69.
32. Tonkiss J, Rawlins JNP. 1991. The competitive NMDA antagonist, AP5, but not the non-competitive antagonist, MK-801, induces a delay-related impairment in spatial working memory in rats. Exp Brain Res 85:349-358.
33. Tsien JZ, Huerta PT, Tonegawa S. 1996. The essential role of hippocampal CA1 NMDA receptor-dependent synaptic plasticity in spatial memory. Cell 87:1327-1338.
34. Whishaw IQ, Jarrard LE. 1996. Evidence for extrahippocampal involvement in place learning and hippocampal involvement in path integration. Hippocampus 6:513-524.
35. Zamanillo D, Sprengel R, Hvalby O, Jensen V, Burnashev N, Rozov A, Kaiser KM, Koster HJ, Borchardt T, Worley P, Lubke J, Frotscher M, Kelly PH, Sommer B, Andersen P, Seeburg PH, Sakmann B. 1999. Importance of AMPA receptors for hippocampal synaptic plasticity but not for spatial learning. Science 284:1805-1811.
36. Zeng H, Chattarji S, Barbarosie M, Rondi-Reig L, Philpot B, Miyakawa T, Bear MF, Tonegawa S. 2001. Forebrain-specific calcineurin knockout selectively impairs bidirectional synaptic plasticity and working/episodic-like memory. Cell 107:617-629.