Efficacy of voice therapy assessed with the voice range profile (Phonetogram);Evaluation de l'efficacité de la rééducation vocale par le phonétogramme

Revue de Laryngologie Otologie Rhinologie

Volumn 124, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 285-289

  DeJonckere, P H ^a   Van Wijck, I ^a   Speyer, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Efficacy; Logopedics; Phonetogram; Voice range profile; Voice therapy

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ADULT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYSPHONIA; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; PHONETICS; SPEECH REHABILITATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACOUSTICS; ADULT; ENDPOINT DETERMINATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VOICE DISORDERS; VOICE TRAINING;

EID: 1842763043     PISSN: 00351334     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. SCHULTZ-COULON HJ. Stimmfeldmessung. Berlin Springer Verlag, 1990.
2. ROSINGH HJ, DIKKERS FG. Thyroplasty to improve the voice in patients with a unilateral vocal fold paralysis. CLIN OTOLARYNGOL. 1995;20,2:124-126.
3. BEHRMAN A, AGRESTI CJ, BLUMSTEIN E, SHARMA G. Meaningful features of voice range profiles from patients with organic vocal fold pathology: a preliminary study. J. VOICE. 1996;10:269-283.
4. FRIEDRICH G. External vocal cord medialization: functional outcome. LARYNGORHINOOTOLOGIE. 1998;77,1:18-26.
5. IKEDA Y, MASUDA T, MANAKO H, YAMASHITA H, YAMAMOTO T, KOMIYAMA S. Quantitative evaluation of the voice range profile in patients with voice disorder. EUR. ARCH. OTORHINOLARYNGOL. 1999;256 suppl.1:S51-S55.
6. SITTEL C, ECKEL HE, ESCHENBURG C. Phonatory results after laser surgery for glottic carcinoma. OTOLARYNGOL HEAD NECK SURG. 1998;119,4:418-424.
7. VERDONCK-DE LEEUW I, HILGERS FJ, KEUS RB et al. Multidimensional assessment of voice characteristics after radiotherapy for early glottic cancer. LARYNGOSCOPE. 1999;109:241-248.
8. PEDERSEN MF. Computed phonetograms in adult patients with benign voice disorders before and after treatment with a nonsedating antihistamine (loratadine). FOLIA PHONIATR. 1991;43:60-67.
9. SCHUTYE HK, SEIDNER W. Recommendations by the Union of European Phoniatricians (UEP): standardizing voice area measurement/phonetography. FOLIA PHONIATR. 1993;35:286-288.
10. GRAMMING P, SUNDBERG, J, AKERLUND L. Variability of phonetograms. FOLIA PHONIATR. 1991;43:79-92.
11. COLEMAN RF. Sources of variation in phonetograms. J. VOICE. 1993;7:1-14.
12. MERSBERGEN VAN M, VERDOLINI K, TITZE IR. Time-of-day effects on voice range profile performance in young, vocally untrained adult females. J. VOICE. 1999;13:518-528.
13. SIHVO M, LAIPPALA P, SALA E. A study of repeated measures of softest and loudest phonations. J. VOICE. 2000;14:161-169.
14. TITZE IR. Phonation threshold pressure - a missing link in glottal aerodynamics. J. ACOUST. SOC. AM. 1992;91:2926-2935.
15. TITZE IR. Acoustic interpretation of the voice profile (phonetogram). J. SPEECH HEAR. RES. 1992;35:21-24.
16. LEBORGNE WD, WEINRICH BD. Phonetogram changes for trained singers over a nine-month period of vocal training. J. VOICE. 2002;16,1:37-43.
17. GRAMMING P, SUNDBERG J. Spectrum factors relevant to phonetogram measurement. J. ACOUST. SOC. AM. 1988;83,6:2352-2360.
18. VERDOLINI K. Voice disorders. In: Tomblin JB, Morris HL, Spriesterbach DC (eds.). Diagnosis in Speech-Language Pathology. San Diego, Singular Publishing group, 1994:247-306.
19. WUYTS F, DE BODT M, MOLENBERGHS G, REMACLE M, HEYLEN L, MILLET B, VAN LIERDE K, RAES J, VAN DE HEYNING P. The Dysphonia Severity Index: an objective measure of quality based on a multiparameter approach. J SPEECH LANG. HEAR RES. 2000;43:796-809.