Time-of-day effects on voice range profile performance in young, vocally untrained adult females

Journal of Voice

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 518-528

  Van Mersbergen, Miriam R ^a,c   Verdolini, Katherine ^a   Titze, Ingo R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b University of Arizona   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Fatigue; Phonetogram; Time of day effects; Voice; Voice range profile (VRP); Warm up

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FATIGUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LOUDNESS; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONETICS; TIME; VOICE;

EID: 0033433987     PISSN: 08921997     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0892-1997(99)80007-1     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Wolfe SK, Stanley D, Sette WJ. Quantitative studies on the singing voice. J Acoust Soc Am. 1935;6:255-266.
2. Stout B. The harmonic structure of vowels in singing in relation to pitch and intensity. J Acoust Soc Am. 1938;10:137-46.
3. Calvert J, Malhiac G. Courbes vocales et mue de la voix. J Fr Otorhinolaryngol. 1952;1:155-124.
4. Coleman RF. Sources of variation on phonetograms. J Voice. 1993;7:1-14.
5. Klingholtz F. Das Stimmfeld: Eine Praktische Anleitung zur Messung und Auswertung [The Voice Field: A Practical Guide to Measurement and Annalysis]. Munich: Verlag J. Peperny, 1990.
6. Damsté PH. The phonetogram. Pract Oto-Rhino-Laryngologica. 1970;31:185-187.
7. Komiyama S, Watanabe H, Ryu S. Phonographic relationship between pitch and intensity of the human voice. Folia Phoniatr. 1984;36:1-7.
8. Bloothooft G. A computer controlled device for voice-profile registration. In: Schutte HK, ed., Congress Proceedings and Abstracts of the IXth Congress of the Union of European Phoniatricians. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Centrale Reproductiedienst VU: 1981:83-85.
9. Coleman RF, Mabis JH, Hinson JK. Fundamental frequency-sound pressure level profiles of adult male and female voices. J Speech Hear Res. 1977;20:197-204.
10. Rauhut A, Stürzebecher E, Wagner H, Seidner W. Messung des Stimmfelds. Folia Phoniatr. 1979;31:110-119.
11. Schutte HK, Seidner W. Recommendation by the Union of European Phoniatricians (UEP): standardizing voice area measurement/phonetography. Folia Phoniatr. 1983;35:286-288.
12. Titze IR. Acoustic interpretation of the voice range profile (phonetogram). J Speech Hear Res. 1992;35:21-34.
13. Gramming P, Gauffin J, Sundberg J. An attempt to improve the clinical usefulness of phonetograms. J Phonetics. 1986;14:421-427.
14. Titze IR. Principles of Voice Production. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1994.
15. Gauffin J, Sundberg J. Data on the glottal voice source behavior in voice production. Speech Transmission Laboratory: Quarterly Progress and Status Report. 1980;2:61-70.
16. Gramming P. The phonetogram: an experimental and clinical study [Dissertation]. Malmo, Sweeden: Lund University, 1988.
17. Pabon J, Plomp R. Automatic phonetogram recording supplemented by acoustic voice quality parameters. J Speech Hear Res. 1988;31:710-23.
18. Coleman R, Mott J. Fundemental frequency and sound pressure profiles of young female singers. Folia Phonitar. 1978;30:94-102
19. Reich A, Frederickson R, Mason J, Schlauch R. Methodological variables affecting phonational frequency range in adults. J Speech Hear Dis. 1990;555:124-31.
20. Schutte, Hk. The efficiency of voice production, [Dissertation]. Groningen, Netherlands: University of Gronigen, 1980.
21. Sundberg J. The science of the singing voice. Dekalb, III: Northern Illinois University Press, 1987.
22. Barney HL, Dunn HK. In: Kaiser L, ed. Manual of Phonetics. Amsterdam:North-Holland Publishing, 1957:195-7.
23. Kent R, Kent J, Rosenbek j. Maximum performance tests of speech production. J Speech Hear Dis. 1987;52:367-87.
24. Hollien H. On vocal registers. J Phonetics. 1974;2:125-43
25. Flannigan JL. Speech analysis synthesis and perception. New York:Academic, Press 1965.
26. Dunn HK, Farnsworth DW Exploration of pressure field around the head during speech. J Acoust Soc Am. 1939;10:184-99.
27. Titze IR, Wong D, Milder MM, Hensley SR, Ramig LO, Pinto NB. Comparison between clinician-assisted and fully automated procedure for obtaining a voice range profile. J Speech Hear Res 1995;38:526-35.
28. Berne RM, Levy MN. Physiology 3rd ed. St. Louis Mo: Mosby Year Book, 1993.
29. Verdolini-Marston K, Titze IR, Druker DG. Changes in phonation threshold pressure with induced conditions of hydration. J Voice. 1990;4:142-151.
30. Verdolini-Marston K, Titze IR, Fennell A. Dependence of phonatory effort on hydration level. J Speech Hear Res. 1994;37:1001-1007.
31. Enoka EM. Neuromechanical Basis of Kinesiology. Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics Books, 1988.
32. Enoka RM, Stuart D. Neurobiology of muscle fatigue. J App Physiol, 1992;72:1631-1648.
33. Hainaut K, Duchateau J. Muscle fatigue effects of training and disuse. Muscle Nerve. 1989;12:660-669.
34. Ericsson KA, Krampe RTh, Tesch-Römer C. The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychol Rev. 1993;100:363-406.
35. Verdolini-Marston K, Sandage M, Titze IR. Effects of hydration on laryngeal nodules and polyps and related voice measures. J Voice. 1994;8:30-47.