Response surface methods and pareto optimization in crashworthiness design

Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference

Volumn 2 A, Issue , 2003, Pages 473-479

  Andersson, Johan ^a   Redhe, Marcus ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CRASHWORTHINESS; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; OPTIMIZATION; PARETO PRINCIPLE; POLYNOMIALS; PROBLEM SOLVING; QUADRATIC PROGRAMMING; VECTORS;

CENTRAL COMPOSITE DESIGN (CCD); CRASHWORTHINESS DESIGN; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODS;

AUTOMOTIVE ENGINEERING;

EID: 1842710157     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1115/detc2003/dac-48752     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Andersson J, Wallace D., 2003, "Pareto optimization using the Struggle Genetic Crowding Algorithm", Engineering Optimization, Vol 34, No. 6, pp. 623-643.
2. Batill S., Stelmack M., Sellar R., 1999, "Framework for Multidisciplinary Design Based on Response-Surface Approximations", Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 36, No 1, January-February.
3. Box G., Hunter W., Hunter S., 1978, Statistics for Experiments, John Wiley & Sons.
4. Deb K., 2001, Multi-objective Objective Optimization using Evolutionary algorithms, Wiley and Sons Ltd.
5. Fonseca C. M. and Fleming P. J., 1998, "Multiobjective optimization and multiple constraint handling with evolutionary algorithms - Part I: a unified formulation," IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, & Cybernetics Part A: Systems & Humans, vol. 28, pp. 26-37.
6. Forsberg J, 2002, Simulation based crashwothiness design - Accuracy aspects of structural optimization using response surfaces, LIU-TEK-LIC-2002:27, Linköpings Universitet, Linköping.
7. Goldberg D., 1989, "Genetic Algorithms in Search and Machine Learning. Reading, Addison Wesley.
8. Grueninger T. and Wallace D., 1996, "Multi-modal optimization using genetic algorithms", Technical Report 96.02, CADlab, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
9. Hallquist, J.O. 2001: LS-DYNA User's Manual v. 960. Livermore Software Technology Company, Livermore.
10. Lin Y., Krishnapur K., Allen J., Mistree F., 2000, "Robust Concept Exploration in Engineering Design: Metamodeling Techniques and Gaol Formulations", ASME Design Automation Conference, Baltimore, Maryland, September 10-14.
11. Marklund, P-O. 1999: Optimization of a Car Body Component Subjected to Impact. LIU-TEK-LIC-1999:34, Linköping University, Linköping.
12. Marklund, P-O. and Nilsson L. 2001. Optimization of a Car Body Component Subjected to Impact. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 21, pp. 383-392.
13. Marvis D., Qiu S., 1999, "An Improved Process for the Generation of Drag Polars for use in Conceptual/Preliminary Design, 1999 World Aviation Congress, San Francisco, October 19-21.
14. Myers, R.H.; Montgomery, D.C. 1995: Response Surface Methodology. New York: John Wiley.
15. Pareto V., 1896, "Cours d'Économie Politique. Lausanne, Rouge.
16. Roux W. J., Stander N., Haftka R. T., Response Surface Approximations for Structual Optimization, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Vol 42, pp. 517-534, 1998.
17. Redhe M, Forsberg J, Jansson T, Marklund P.O and Nilsson L, 2002b. Using the Response Surface Methodology and the D-Optimality Criterion in Crashworthiness Related Problems - an analysis of the surface approximation error versus the number of function evaluations. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Volume 24 Issue 3, 185-194
18. Redhe, M, 2001. Simulation Based Design - Structural optimization at early design stages, LIU-TEK-LIC-2001:51, Linköpings university, Linköping
19. Redhe, M. and Nilsson L Using Space Mapping and Surrogate Models to Optimize Vehicle Crashworthiness Design, 2002c, AIAA-2002-5536, Editor Farrokh Mistree, 9th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
20. Redhe, M. and Nilsson L. 2002a. A Method to Determine Structural Sensitivities in Vehicle Crashworthiness Design, International Journal of Crashworthiness vol. 7 number 2, pp. 179-190.
21. Rijpkema J.J.M,. Etman L.F.P and Shoofs A.J.G, 2000, Metamodel based design optimization, including design sensitivities, Proceedings SMSMEO workshop, Denmark University of Technology, Lyngby, November 16-18.
22. Schramm, U. 2001: Multi-disciplinary Optimization for NHV and Crashworthiness. In: Bathe, K.J. (ed) The First MIT Conference on Computational Fluid and Solid Mechanics (Boston, June 12-15, 2001), 721-724. Oxford, Elsevier Science Ltd.
23. Schramm, U; Thomas, H. 1998: Crashworthiness Design Using Structural Optimization. AIAA Paper, 98-4729, 1998.
24. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J.; Kodiyalam, S.; Yang, R-J 2000: Optimization of Car Body Under Constraints of Noise, Vibration, and Harshness (NVH), and Crash. AIAA Paper 2000-1521.
25. Yamazaki, K.; Han, J. 1998: Maximization of the Crushing Energy Absorption of Tubes, Structural Optimization 16, 37-46