Learning-based preference modeling in engineering design decision–making

Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions of the ASME

Volumn 123, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 191-198

  Wan, Jie ^a   Krishnamurty, Sundar ^a  

^a University of Massachusetts   (United States)

Author keywords

Engineering design; Multiattribute decision making; Utility theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 1842677418     PISSN: 10500472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1115/1.1361061     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Gold, S., and Krrhnamurty, S., 1997, “Tradeoff; in Robust Engineering Design.” Proceeding; of DETC’97, 1997 Design Engineering Technical Conferences. Sacramento. California, DETC97.DAC-3757.
2. Thurston, D. L., 1991, “A Formal Method for Subjective Design Evaluanon with Multiple Attributes/’ Research in Engineering Design. 3, pp. 105-122.
3. Raiffa, H., and Keeney, R. L., 1993. Decisions nith Multiple Attributes: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Cambridge University Press.
4. Olson, D. L., and Moshkovich, H. M., etc., 1995. “Consistency and Accuracy m Decision Aids: Experiments with Four Multiattribute Systems.” Decision Sciences. 26. No. 6. pp. 723-748.
5. Badinelli, PL., and Baler, J. R., 1990. “Multiple Attribute Decision Making with Inexact Value-Function Assessment.” Decision Sciences. 21. pp. 318- 336.
6. Fincher, G. W., 1979, “Utility Models for Multiple Objective Decisions: Do They Accurately Represent Human Preferences’1,” Decision Science;. 10. pp. 45l-479.
7. Larichev, Q. L., Moshkovich, H. M., Mechitov, A. I, and Olson, D. L., 1993. “Experiments comparing qualitative approaches to rank ordering of multiat- tnbute alternative;. Journal of Multi-criteria Decision Analysis. 2. No. 1. pp. 5-26.
8. Belton, V., 1986. “A Companion of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and a Simple Multiattribute Value Function.” European Journal of Operational Search 26. pp. 7-21.
9. Saaty, T. L., 1990. “How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process,” European Journal of Operational Research. 48. pp. 9-26.
10. Winkler, R L., 1990. “Decision Modeling and Ranonal Choice: AHP and Utility Theory,” Manage. ScL. 36. No. 3. pp. 247-248.
11. Larichev, Q. I., and Moshkovich, H. M, 1995. “ZAPROS-LM-A Method and System for Rank-Ordering of Multiattnbute Alternative,” European Journal of Operational Research 82. pp. 503-521.
12. Jacquet-Lagreze, E., and Siskos, J., 1982. “Assessing a Set of Additive Utility Functions for Multicriteria Decision Making: The UTA Method.” European Journal of Operational Research. 10. po. 151-164.
13. Dyer, J. S., Fishbum, P. C., Steuer, R E., Wallemus, J., and Zionts, S., 1992, “Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Multiattnbute Utility Theory: The Next Ten Years.” Manage. Sci., 38. pp. 645-654.
14. Hazerlrigg, G. A., 1996. “Systems Engineering: A New Framework for Engineering Design.” Engineering Systems American Society of Mechanical En- sineers. Dvnamic Svstems and Control Division (Publication) DSC, 60. pp. 39-46.
15. von Winterfeldt, D., and Edwards, W., 1986. Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research, Cambndge University Press.
16. Zeleny, M., 1982, Multiple Criretia Decision Making. McGraw-Hill Book Company, San Francisco.
17. Sykes, E. A., and White. C. C. El. 1991. “Multiattribute Intelligent Computer- Aided Design.” IEEE Tran:. Syst. Man Cybem. 21, No. 6. pp. 1498-1511.
18. Yang, J. B., and Sen P., 1996, “Preference Modeling by Estimating Local Utility Function; for Multiobjective Optimization” European Journal of Op- eranonal Research. pp. 115-13S.
19. Shin W. S., and Ravindran, A., 1991, “Interactive Multiple Objective Optimization Survey I-Continuous Case.” Computer: Operation: Research. 18. No. 1. pp. 97-114.
20. Chankong, V., and Haimes, Y. Y. (Eds.), 1983, “Multiobjective Decision Making: Theory and Methodology.” North-Holland. New Yoik.
21. Osyczka, A., 1985, “Multicriteria Optimization for Engineering Design” Design Optimization Academic Press, pp. 193-227.
22. Fishbum, P. C., 1967, “Methods of Estimating Additive Utilmes.” Manage. ScL, 13. pp. 435-453.
23. Dawes, R M, and Comean B., 1974. “Linear Models m Decision Making.” PsychoL BulL,. 81. pp. 95-106.
24. Jacquet-Lagreze, E., Meziani, R., and Slowinski, R., 1987, “MOLP with an Interactive Assessment of Piecewise Linear Utility Functions,” Eur. J. of Op- eranonal Research. 31. pp. 350-357.
25. Wan, J., and Knshnamurty, S., 1998. “Towards a Consistent Preference Representation m Engineering Design” Proceeding of the 199S Design Engineering Technical Conference DETC9S DTM-5675.
26. Walsh, G. R. 1985, An Introduction to Linear Piopamming. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., New York.
27. Best, M. J., and Ritter, K., 1985, Linear Piopamming: Acme Set Analysis and Computet Programs. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs. New Jersey.
28. Soiow, D., 1984, Linear Piopamming: An Intr oduction to Finite Improvement Algorithms. North-Holland. New Yolk.
29. Ranyard, R., Crozier, W. R. and Svenson, O., 1997, Decision Making: Cognitive Modeh and Explanations, Routledge. New York.