Towards a consistent preference representation in engineering design

Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference

Volumn 3, Issue , 1998, Pages

  Wan, Jie ^a   Krishnamurty, Sundar ^a  

^a University of Massachusetts   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision Model; Engineering Design; Multiattribute Optimization; Tradeoff Analysis; Utility Theory

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING;

DECISION MAKER'S PREFERENCES; DEDUCTIVE REASONING; MULTI-ATTRIBUTE UTILITY THEORY; PAIR-WISE COMPARISON; PREFERENCE INFORMATION; PREFERENCE ORIENTATION; PREFERENCE REPRESENTATION; UNCERTAINTY AND RISKS;

DECISION THEORY;

EID: 85025200577     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1115/DETC98/DTM-5675     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Badinelli, R. and Baker, J. R., 1990, Multiple Attribute Decision Making with Inexact Value-Function Assessment, Decision Sciences, Vol. 21, pp. 318-336.
2. Barzilai, J., & Golany, B., 1986, Deriving weights from pairwise comparison matrices: The additive case. Decision Sciences, Vol. 17 (3), pp. 572-588.
3. Belton, V., 1986, A comparison of the analytic hierarchy process and a simple multiattribute value function. European Journal of Operational Search, Vol. 26, pp. 7-2.
4. Chankong, V., & Haimes, Y. Y. (Eds.), 1983, Multiobjective decision making: Theory and methodology, New York: North-Holland.
5. Dawes, R. M., & Corrigan, B., 1974, Linear models in decision making. Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 81, pp. 95-106.
6. Dyer, J. S., 1990, Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process. Management Science, Vol. 36(3), pp. 249-258.
7. Dyer, J. S., Fishburn, P.C., Steuer, R. E., Wallenius, J., & Zionts, S., 1992, Multiple criteria decision making, multiattribute utility theory: The next ten years, Management Sciences, Vol. 38, pp. 645-654.
8. Fishburn, P. C., 1967, Methods of estimating additive utilities, Management Sciences, Vol. 13, pp. 435-453.
9. Fischer, G. W., 1979, Utility models for multiple objective decisions: Do they accurately represent human preferences? Decision Sciences, Vol. 10, pp. 451-479.
10. Gold, S. and Krishnamurty, S., 1997, Tradeoffs in robust engineering design, Proceedings of DETCÆ97, 1997 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Sacramento California.
11. Harker, P. T., & Vargas, L. G., 1987, The theory of ratio scale estimation: Saaty's analytic hierarchy process. Management Science, Vol. 33, pp. 1383-1403.
12. Hazerlrigg, G. A., 1996, Systems Engineering: a new framework for engineering design, Engineering Systems American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Dynamic Systems and Control Division (Publication) DSC Vol. 60, pp. 39-46.
13. Jacquet-Lagreze, E., & Siskos, J., 1982, Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision making: The UTA method. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.10, pp. 151-164.
14. Jacquet-Lagreze, E., Meziani, R., and Slowinski, R., 1987, MOLP with an interactive assessment of piecewise linear utility functions. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 31, pp. 350-357.
15. Larichev, Q. I., & Moshkovich, H. M., 1995, ZAPROSLMùA method and system for rank-ordering of multiattribute alternative. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 82, pp. 503-521.
16. Larichev, Q. I., Moshkovich, H. M., Mechitov, A. I., & Olson, D. L., 1993, Experiments comparing qualitative approaches to rank ordering of multiattribute alternatives. Journal of Multi-criteria Decision Analysis, Vol. 2(1), pp. 5-26.
17. Ng, W. Y., 1991, Generalized computer-aided design system-A multiattribute approach, Computer Aided Design, Vol. 23, No. 8, pp. 548-553.
18. Olson, D. L. and Moshkovich, H. M., etc., 1995, Consistency and Accuracy in Decision Aids: Experiments with Four Multiattribute Systems, Decision Sciences, Vol. 26 Number 6, pp. 723-748.
19. Osyczka, A., 1985, Multicriteria Optimization for Engineering Design, Design Optimization, Academic Press, pp. 193-227.
20. Publications in Decision-based Design Open Workshop (URL: http:// www.eng.buffalo.edu.edu /Research /DBD/).
21. Raiffa, H. and Keeney, R. L, 1993, Decisions With Multiple Attributes: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, Cambridge University Press.
22. Saaty, T. L., 1994, Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the AHP. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.
23. Saaty, T. L., 1982, Decision making for leaders: the analytical hierarchy process for decisions in a complex world. Belmont, California: Lifetime Learning Publications.
24. Saaty, T. L., 1990, How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 48, pp. 9-26.
25. Shin, W. S. and Ravindran, A., 1991, Interactive Multiple Objective Optimization Survey I û Continuous Case, Computers Operations Research, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 97-114.
26. Sykes, E. A. and White, C. C. III, 1991, Multiattribute intelligent computer-aided design, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 1498-1511.
27. Thurston, D. L., 1991, A Formal Method for Subjective Design Evaluation with Multiple Attributes, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 3, pp. 105-122.
28. Weiss, E.N., & Rao, V. R., 1987, AHP design issues for large-scale systems. Decision Sciences, Vol.18(1), pp. 43-57.
29. Winkler, R. L., 1990, Decision modeling and rational choice: AHP and utility theory. Management Science, Vol. 36(3), pp. 247-248.
30. von Winterfeldt, D. and Edwards. W., 1986, Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research, Cambridge University Press.
31. Yang, J. B. and Sen P., 1996, Preference modeling by estimating local utility functions for multiobjective optimization, European Journal of Operational Research, pp. 115-138.