Researching the impact of the networked information environment on learning and teaching

Computers and Education

Volumn 43, Issue 1-2 SPEC ISS., 2004, Pages 205-213

  Zenios, M ^a   Goodyear, P ^b   Jones, C ^a  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Adult learning; Evaluation methodologies; Evaluation of CAL systems; Interactive learning environments; Pedagogical issues

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; INTERNET; TEACHING;

ADULT LEARNING; EVALUATION METHODOLOGIES; EVALUATION OF CAL SYSTEMS; INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS; PEDAGOGICAL ISSUES;

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION;

EID: 1842636280     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2003.12.014     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Anderson C., Day K., Haywood D., Haywood J., Land R., MacLeod H. Evaluating networked learning: Developing a multi-disciplinary, multi-method approach. Steeples C., Jones C. Networked learning: Perspectives and issues. 2002;Springer, London.
2. Biggs J. Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does. 1999;Open University Press, Buckingham.
3. DNER (2002). JISC Distributed National Electronic Resource. Available: http://www.dner.ac.uk, 25 September 2002.
4. Goodyear P. Environments for lifelong learning: Ergonomics, architecture and educational design. Spector J.M., Anderson T. Integrated and holistic perspectives on learning, instruction and technology: Understanding complexity. 2000;1-18 Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
5. Goodyear P. Seeing learning as work: Implications for understanding and improving analysis and design. Journal of Courseware Engineering. 2:2000;3-11.
6. Goodyear P., Jones C. Implicit theories of learning and change: Their role in the development of e-learning environments for higher education. Naidu S. Learning and teaching with technology: Principles and practices. 2003;Kogan Page, London.
7. JISC (2002). Adding value to the UK's learning, teaching and research resources, 3rd joint programmed meeting, January 24-25, 2002, Manchester. Available: http://jisc.ac.uk/dner/development/IEstrategy.html.
8. Jones C., Steeples C. Perspectives and issues in networked learning. Steeples C., Jones C. Networked learning: Perspectives and issues. 2002;Springer, London.
9. Jones, C., Zenios, M., Goodyear, P. (2003). Report on the formative evaluation of teaching and learning aspects of the IE/DNER. Lancaster: CSALT.
10. Levy P. A methodological framework for practice-based research in networked learning. Instructional Science. 31(1/2):2003;87-109.
11. McLaughlin, J., Jordan, G. (1998). Logic models: A tool for telling your programme's performance story, June 5, 2001. Available: http://www.pmn.net/ education/Login.htm.
12. Nash, J., Plugge, L., Eurelings, A. (2000). Designing and evaluating CSCL projects, Paper presented at the European conference on computer supported collaborative learning 2000, Maastricht.
13. Ramsden P., Entwistle N. Effects of academic departments on students' approaches to studying. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 51:1981;368-383.
14. Salmon G. Approaches to researching teaching and learning online. Steeples C., Jones C. Networked learning: Perspectives and issues. 2002;Springer, London.
15. Strömdahl H., Langerth Zetterman M. Theory-anchored evaluation an attempt to increase ownership in evaluation in higher education. 2002;KTH Learning Laboratory, Stockholm, Sweden.
16. Wasson B., Ludvigsen S., Hoppe U. Designing for change in networked learning environments. 2003;Kluwer, Dordrecht.