Total research productivity in a pathology discipline

Journal of Clinical Pathology

Volumn 55, Issue 7, 2002, Pages 495-498

  Wierzbicki, Anthony S ^a   Reynolds, T M ^b  

^a ST THOMAS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEEN S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PATHOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; STANDARD; TEACHING HOSPITAL;

EID: 0036068067     PISSN: 00219746     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jcp.55.7.495     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Aussies to sidestep Pommy "pitfalls"
2. Editorial. A valuable Dutch lesson in research assessment
3. Misleading, unscientific, and unjust: The United Kingdom's research assessment exercise
4. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research
5. The Universities' research assessment exercise 1992; a second opinion
6. W(h)ither academic pathology?
7. Laboratory medicine: The need for a broader view. The "multiple bundle" model of clinical laboratory function
8. The physician-scientist: An essential- and fragile-link in the medical research chain
9. Staffing of clinical biochemistry laboratories serving the National Health Service