Jurors' Perception of Witnesses with Intellectual Disabilities and the Influence of Expert Evidence

Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 107-114

  Stobbs, Georgina ^a   Kebbell, Mark Rhys ^a  

^a JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Competence; Court; Mental retardation; Witnesses

Indexed keywords

EID: 1842587482     PISSN: 13602322     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1468-3148.2003.00151.x     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Americans With Disabilities Act (1990) Pub. L. NO. 101-336, S 2, 104 Stat. 328 (1991).
2. Bell B. E. & Loftus E. F. (1989) Trivial persuasion in the courtroom: the power of (a few) minor details. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56, 669-679.
3. Berman G. L., Narby D. J. & Cutler B. L. (1995) Effects of inconsistent eyewitness statements on mock-jurors evaluations of the eyewitness, perceptions of defendant culpability and verdicts, Law and Human Behavior 19, 79-88.
4. Brown C. L. & Geiselman R. E. (1990) Eyewitness testimony of the mentally retarded: effect of the cognitive interview. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology 6, 14-21.
5. Bull R. (1995) Interviewing witnesses with communicative disability. In: Handbook of Psychology in Legal Contexts (eds R. Bull & D. Carson), pp. 248-260. Wiley, Chichester.
6. Bull R. & McAlpine S. (1998) Facial appearance and criminality. In: Psychology and Law: Truthfulness, Accuracy and Credibility (eds A. Memon, A. Vrij & R. Bull), pp. 59-76. Wiley, Chichester.
7. Calnern T. & Blackman L. S. (1992) Capital punishment and offenders with mental retardation: response to the Penry brief. American Journal on Mental Retardation 96, 557-564.
8. Cardone D. & Dent H. (1996) Memory and interrogative suggestibility: the effects of modality of information presentation and retrieval conditions upon the suggestibility scores of people with mental retardation. Legal and Criminological Psychology 1, 165-177.
9. Clare I. C. H. & Gudjonsson G. H. (1993) Interrogative suggestibility, confabulation, and acquiescence in people with mild learning disabilities (mental handicap): implications for reliability during police interrogations. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 32, 295-301.
10. Clifford B. R. & George R. (1996) A field evaluation of training in three methods of witness/victim investigative interviewing. Psychology, Crime and Law 2, 231-248.
11. Cutler B. L., Penrod S. D. & Dexter H. R. (1989) The eyewitness, the expert psychologist, and the jury. Law and Human Behavior 13, 311-332.
12. Dent H. (1986) An experimental study of the effectiveness of different techniques of interviewing mentally handicapped child witnesses. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 25, 13-17.
13. Detterman D. K. (1979) Memory in the mentally retarded. In: Handbook of Mental Deficiency: Psychological Theory and Research (ed. N.R. Ellis), pp. 727-760. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.F.
14. Easterbrook J. A. (1959) The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization. Psychological Review 66, 183-201.
15. Fisher R. P., Geiselman R. E. & Raymond D. S. (1987) Critical analysis of police interviewing techniques. Journal of Police Science and Administration 15, 177-185.
16. Furnham A. & Pendred J. (1983) Attitudes towards the mentally and physically disabled. British Journal of Medical Psychology 56, 179-187.
17. Gorden B. N., Jens K. G., Rollings R. & Watson T. E. (1994) Remembering activities performed versus those imagined: implication for testimony of children with mental retardation. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology 23, 239-248.
18. Gudjonsson G. H. (1997) The Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales. Psychology Press, Hove.
19. Gudjonsson G. H. & Gunn J. (1982) The competence and reliability of a witness in a criminal court. British Journal of Psychiatry 141, 624-627.
20. Gudjonsson G. H., Murphy G. H. & Clare I. C. H. (2000) Assessing the capacity of people with intellectual disabilities to be witnesses in court. Psychological Medicine 30, 307-314.
21. Hastie R., ed. (1993) Inside the Juror: the Psychology of Decision Making. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
22. Hatvany N. & Strack F. (1980) The impact of a discredited key witness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 10, 490-509.
23. Home Office (1999) Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act. Stationary Office, London.
24. Home Office. (1998) Speaking Up for Justice. Report of the Interdepartmental Working Group on the treatment of Vulnerable or Intimidated Witnesses in the Criminal Justice System. HMSO, Home Office, London.
25. Hosch H. M., Beck E. L. & McIntyre P. (1980) Influence of expert testimony regarding eyewitness accuracy on jury decisions. Law and Human Behavior 4, 287-296.
26. Howell D. C. (1992) Statistical Methods for Psychology, 3rd edn. Duxby Press, Belmont, California.
27. Imrie R. (1997) Rethinking the relationships between disability, rehabilitation, and society. Disability and Rehabilitation 19, 263-271.
28. Karnilowicz W., Sparrow W. A. & Shinkfield A. J. (1994) High school-students attitudes toward performing social behaviors with mentally-retarded and physically disabled peers. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 9, 65-80.
29. Kebbell M. R. & Hatton C. (1999) People with mental retardation as witnesses in court: a review. Mental Retardation 37, 179-187.
30. Kebbell M. R. & Johnson S. D. (2000) The influence of lawyers' questions on witness confidence and accuracy. Law and Human Behavior 24, 629-641.
31. Kebbell M. & Milne R. (1998) Police officers' perception of eye-witness factors in forensic investigations: a survey. Journal of Social Psychology 138, 323-330.
32. Kebbell M. R. & Wagstaff G. F. (1997) Why do the police interview eyewitnesses? Interview objectives and the evaluation of eye-witness performance. Journal of Psychology 131, 595-601.
33. Kebbell M. R., Hatton C. & Johnson S. D. (2000) Witnesses with learning disabilities in court. Full report of research activities and results. End of Grant Report to the Economic and Social Research Council. Unpublished manuscript. University of Birmingham, Birmingham.
34. Kebbell M. R., Hatton C., Johnson S. D. & O'Kelly C. M.E. (2001) People with learning disabilities as witnesses in court: what questions should lawyers ask? British Journal of Learning Difficulties 29, 1-5.
35. Loftus E. F. (1974) Reconstructing memory: the incredible eye-witness. Psychology Today 8, 116-119.
36. Maass A., Brigham J. C. & West S. G. (1985) Testifying on eye-witness reliability: expert advice is not always persuasive. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 15, 207-229.
37. Memon A. & Vartoukian R. (1996) The effects of repeated questioning on young children's eyewitness testimony. British Journal of Psychology 87, 403-415.
38. Milne R. & Bull R. (1999) Investigative Interviewing: Psychology and Practice. Wiley, Chicester.
39. Milne R., Clare I. C. H. & Bull R. (1999) Interviewing adults with learning disability with the cognitive interview. Psychology, Crime and Law 5, 81-100.
40. Perlman N. B., Ericson K. I., Esses V. M. & Isaacs B. J. (1994) The developmentally handicapped witness: competency as a function of question format. Law and Human Behavior 18, 171-187.
41. Prosser H. & Bromley J. (1998) Interviewing people with intellectual disabilities. In: Clinical Psychology and People with Intellectual Disabilities (eds E. Emerson, C. Hatton, J. Bromley & A. Caine), pp. 99-113. Wiley, Chichester.
42. Rand Corporation. (1975) The Criminal Investigation Process. (Rand Corporation Tech. Rep. R-1777, 1-3). Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
43. Sanders A., Creaton J., Bird S. & Weber L. (1997) Victims with Learning Disabilities: Negotiating the Criminal Justice System. Centre for Criminological Research, Oxford.
44. Sigelman C., Budd E. C., Winer J., Schoenrock C. & Martin P. (1982) Evaluating alternative techniques of questioning mentally retarded persons. American Journal of Mental Deficiency 86, 511-518.
45. Spanos N. P., Gwynn M. I. & Terrade K. (1989) Effects on mock-jurors of experts favorable and unfavorable toward hypnotically elicited eyewitness testimony. Journal of Applied Psychology 74, 922-926.
46. Valenti-Hein D. C. & Schwartz M. A. (1993) Witness competency in people with mental retardation: Implications for prosecution of sexual abuse. Sexuality and Disability 11, 287-294.
47. Weinberg H. I. & Baron R. S. (1982) The discredible eyewitness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 8, 60-67.
48. Wells G. L. & Leippe M. R. (1981) How do triers of fact infer the accuracy of eyewitness identifications? Using memory for peripheral detail can be misleading. Journal of Applied Psychology 66, 682-687.
49. Wells G. L., Lindsay R. C.L. & Tousignant J. P. (1980) Effects of expert psychological advice on human performance in judging the validity of eyewitness testimony. Law and Human Behavior 4, 275-285.
50. Williams C. (1995) Invisible Victims: Crime and Abuse Against People with Learning Disabilities. Jessica Kingsley, London.