Reconstructing andrew jackson: Prospective elementary teachers’ readings of revisionist history texts

Theory and Research in Social Education

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 411-444

  Van Sledrjght, Bruce ^a   Flerbach, Peter A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1842586198     PISSN: 00933104     EISSN: 21631654     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00933104.2000.10505915     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Afflerbach, P., & VanSledright, B.A. (1998, December). The challenge of understanding the past: How do fifth-grade readers construct meaning from diverse history texts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, Austin, TX.
2. Bohan, C.H., & Davis, O.L. (1998). Historical constructions: How social studies student teachers’ historical thinking is reflected in their writing of history. Theory and Research in Social Education, 26, 173-197.
3. Bruner, J.S. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
4. Gray, P. (1991). Whose America? Time, July 8, 12-21.
5. Harlan, D. (1997). The degradation of American history. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6. Lowenthal, D. (1998). The heritage crusade and the spoils of history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Novick, P. (1988). That noble dream: The "objectivity question" and the American historical profession. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. O’Connor, K. (1991). Narrative form and historical representation: A study of American college students’ historical narratives. Paper presented at the Conference for Pedagogic Text and Content Analysis, Harnosand, Sweden.
9. Perfetti, C., Britt, M. A., Rouet, J., Georgi, M., & Mason, R. (1994). How students use texts to learn and reason about historical uncertainty. In M. Carretero & J. Voss (Eds.), Cognitive and instructional processes in history and the social sciences (pp. 257-284). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Stahl, S., Hynd, C., Britton, B., McNish, M., & Bosquet, D. (1996). What happens when students read multiple source documents in history? Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 430-456.
12. Seixas, P. (1998). Student teachers thinking historically. Theory and Research in Social Education, 26, 310-341.
13. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of a new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.
14. Takaki R. (1993). A different mirror: A history of multicultural America. Boston: Little, Brown.
15. Van Dijk, T., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies for discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
16. VanSledright, B.A. (1998). On the importance of historical positionality to thinking about and teaching history. International Journal of Social Education, 12, 1-18.
17. VanSledright, B., & Kelly, C. (1998). Reading American history: The influence of multiple sources on six fifth graders. The Elementary School Journal, 98, 239-265.
18. Wertsch, J.V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.
19. Wineburg, S.S. (1991). On the reading of historical texts: Notes on the breach between school and academy. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 495-519.
20. Wineburg, S.S. (1994). The cognitive representation of historical texts. In G. Leinhardt, I. Beck, & C. Stainton (Eds.), Teaching and learning in history (pp. 171-208). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Yeager, E., & Davis, O.L. (1996). Classroom teachers’ thinking about historical texts: An exploratory study. Theory and Research in Social Education, 24, 146-166.
22. Zinn, H. (1980). A people’s history of the United States. New York: HarperCollins