Spanish gender assignment in an analogical framework

Journal of Quantitative Linguistics

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 49-75

  Eddington, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1842517786     PISSN: 09296174     EISSN: 17445035     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1076/jqul.9.1.49.8482     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Aha, D.W., Kibler, D., & Albert, M.K. (1991). Instance-based learning algorithms. Machine Learning, 6, 37-66.
2. Allen, P., McNeal, M., & Kvak, D. (1992). Perhaps the lexicon in coded as a function of word frequency. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 826-844.
3. Bergen, J.J. (1978). A simplified approach for teaching the gender of Spanish nouns. Hispania, 61, 865-876.
4. Bradley, D. (1980). Lexical representation of derivational relation. In M. Aronoff & M.L. Keaton (Eds.), Juncture (pp. 37-55). Saratoga, CA: Anma Libri.
5. Brisk, M.E. (1976). The acquisition of Spanish gender by first grade Spanish-speaking children. In G.D. Keller, R.V. Teschner, & S. Viera (Eds.), Bilingualism in the bicentennial and beyond (pp. 143-160). New York: Bilingual Press.
6. Brown, R., & Mc Neill, D. (1966). The 'tip of the tongue' phenomenon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 325-337.
7. Bull, W.E. (1965). Spanish for teachers: Applied linguistics. New York: Ronald Press Co.
8. Burzio, L. (1996). Surface constraints versus underlying representations. In J. Durand & B. Laks (Eds.), Current trends in phonology: Models and methods (pp. 97-112). Paris X and University of Salford: University of Salford Publications.
9. Bybee, J. (1985). Morphology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
10. Bybee, J. (1988). Morphology as lexical organization. In M. Hammond & M. Noonan (Eds.), Theoretical approaches to morphology (pp. 119-141). San Diego: Academic Press.
11. Bybee, J. (1994). A view of phonology from a cognitive and functional perspective. Cognitive Linguistics, 5, 285-305.
12. Bybee, J. (1998). The emergent lexicon. In M. Gruber, C.D. Higgins, K.S. Olson, & T. Wysocki (Eds.), Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society (Vol. 34, pp. 421-435). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
13. Bybee, J. (2001). Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
14. Bybee, J. (2002). Skousen's analogical approach as an exemplar-based model of categorization. In R. Skousen, D. Lonsdale, & D. Parkinson (Eds.), Analogical modeling: An exemplar-based approach to language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
15. Chandler, S. (1993). Are rules and modules really necessary for explaining language? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22, 593-606.
16. Chandler, S. (1995). Non-declarative linguistics: Some neuralpsychological perspectives. Rivista di Linguistica, 22, 233-247.
17. Chandler, S. (2002). Skousen's analogical approach as an examplar-based model of categorization. In R. Skousen, D. Lonsdale & D. Parkinson (Eds.), Analogical Modeling: An Exemplar-based Approach to Language. Amsterdam: John Benzamins (in press).
18. Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.
19. Daelemans, W., Gillis, S., & Durieux, G. (1994). Skousen's analogical modeling algorithm: A comparison with lazy learning. In D. Jones (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference on New Methods in Language Processing (pp. 1-7). Manchester: UMIST.
20. Daelemans, W., Zavrel, J., van der Sloot, K., & van den Bosch, A. (1999). TiMBL: Tilburg memory based learner, version 2.0, reference guide. Induction of Linguistic Knowledge Technical Report. Tilburg, Netherlands: ILK Research Group, Tilburg University. (Http://ilk.kub.nl/~ilk/papers/ilk9901.ps. gz)
21. Daugherty, K., & Seidenberg, M.S. (1994). Beyond rules and exceptions: A Connectionist approach to inflectional morphology. In S.D. Lima, R.L. Corrigan, & G.K. Iverson (Eds.), The reality of linguistic rules (pp. 353-388). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
22. Derwing, B.L. (1973). Transformational grammar as a theory of language acquisition. London: Cambridge University Press.
23. Eddington, D. (1996). The psychological status of phonological analyses. Linguistica, 36, 17-37.
24. Eddington, D. (2000a). Analogy and the dual-route model of morphology. Lingua, 110, 281-298.
25. Eddington, D. (2000b). Spanish stress assignment within the Analogical Modeling of Language. Language, 76, 92-109.
26. Eddington, D. (2001). Dissociation in Italian conjugations: A single-route account. Brain and Language. Forthcoming.
27. Frisch, S. (2000). Temporally organized lexical representations as phonological units. In M.B. Broe & J.P. Pierrehumbert (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology V: Acquisition and the lexicon (pp. 283-298). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Frisch, S.A., Large, N.R., & Pisoni, D.B. (2000). Perception of wordlikeness: Effects of segment probability and length on the processing of nonwords. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 481-496.
29. Frisch, S.A., Large, N.R., Zawaydeh, B., & Pisoni, D.B. (2001). In J.L. Bybee & P. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
30. Frisch, S.A., & Zawaydeh, B. (2001). The psychological reality of OCP-place in Arabic. Language, 77, 91-106.
31. García, M.E. (1998). Gender marking in a dialect of Southwest Spanish. Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 17, 49-58.
32. Goldinger, S.D. (1997). Words and voices: Perception and production in an episodic lexicon. In K. Johnson & J.W. Mullennix (Eds.), Talker variability in speech processing (pp. 33-65). San Diego: Academic.
33. Harris, J.W. (1985). Spanish word markers. In F.H. Nuessel, Jr. (Ed.), Current issues in hispanic phonology and morphology (pp. 34-54). Bloomington, IN: Indiana Linguistics Club.
34. Harris, J.W. (1991). The exponence of gender in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry, 22, 27-62.
35. Jones, D. (1996). Analogical natural language processing. London: UCL press.
36. Juilland, A., & Chang-Rodríguez, E. (1964). Frequency dictionary of Spanish words. The Hague: Mouton.
37. Kiparsky, P. (1975). What are phonological theories about? In D. Cohen & J.R. Wirth (Eds.), Testing linguistic hypotheses (pp. 187-209). Washington, D.C.: Hemisphere.
38. Klein, P.W. (1983). Spanish gender morphology. Papers in Romance, 5, 57-64.
39. Klein, P.W. (1989). Spanish 'gender' vowels and lexical representation. Hispanic Linguistics, 3, 147-162.
40. Krott, A. (2002). Analogical hierarchy: Exemplar-based modeling of linkers in Dutch noun-noun compounds. In R. Skousen, D. Lonsdale, & D. Parkinson (Eds.), Analogical modeling: An exemplar-based approach to language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
41. Lamb, S. (2000). Bidirectional processing in language and related cognitive systems. In M. Barlow & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Usage-based models of language (pp. 87-119). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
42. MacKay, D.G. (1982). The problems of flexibility, fluency, and speed-accuracy trade-off in skilled behavior. Psychological Review, 89, 60-94.
43. MacWhinney, B., Leinbach, J., Taraban, R., & McDonald, J. (1989). Language learning: Rules or cues? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 255-277.
44. McClelland, J.L. (1988). Connectionist models and psychological evidence. Journal of Memory and Language, 27,107-123.
45. Medin, D.L., & Schaffer, M.M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85, 207-238.
46. Natalicio, D. (1983). Native speaker intuitions as a basis for determining noun gender rules in Spanish. Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 6, 49-55.
47. Palmeri, T.J., Goldinger, S.D., & Pisoni, D.B. (1993). Episodic encoding of voice attributes and recognition memory for spoken words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 309-328.
48. Pérez-Pereira, M. (1991). The acquisition of gender: What Spanish children tell us. Journal of Child Language, 18, 571-590.
49. Pierrehumbert, J. (1994). Syllable structure and word structure: A study of triconsonantal clusters in English. In P.A. Keating (Ed.), Phonological structure and phonetic form: Papers in laboratory phonology III (pp. 168-188). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50. Pierrehumbert, J. (2001). Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast. In J. Bybee & P. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (pp. 137-157). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
51. Pinker, S., & Prince, A. (1994). Regular and irregular morphology and the psychological status of rules of grammar. In S.D. Lima, R.L. Corrigan, & G.K. Iverson (Eds.), The reality of linguistic rules (pp. 321-351). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
52. Pisoni, D. (1997). Some thoughts on 'normalization' in speech perception. In K. Johnson & J.W. Mullennix (Eds.), Talker variability in speech processing (pp. 9-32). San Diego: Academic.
53. Plunkett, K., & Marchman, V. (1991). U-shaped learning and frequency effects in a multilayered perceptron: Implications for child language acquisition. Cognition, 38, 3-102.
54. Prado, M. (1982). El género en español y la teoría de la marcadez. Hispania, 65, 258-266.
55. Prasada, S., & Pinker, S. (1993). Generalisation of regular and irregular morphological patterns. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 1-56.
56. Real Academia Española. (1995). Diccionario de la lengua española. CD ROM version of the 21st edition. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
57. Riesbeck, C.K., & Schank, R.S. (1989). Inside case-based reasoning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
58. Rodríguez Bou, I. (1966). Recuento de vocabulario de preescolares. Río Piedras, Puerto Rico: Consejo superior de enseñanza.
59. Rosenblat, A. (1952). Género de los sustantivos en -e y en consonante. In Estudios dedicados a Menéndez-Pidal (Vol. 3, pp. 159-202). Madrid: Concejo Superior de Investigaciones cientícas.
60. Rytting, C.A. (2000). An empirical test of analogical modeling: The /k/ ∼ ø alternation. In A.K. Melby & A.R. Lommel (Eds.), Lacus forum XVII: The lexicon (pp. 73-84). Fullerton, CA: Linguistic Association of Canada and the United States.
61. Say, T., & Clahsen, H. (2001). Words, rules, and stems in the Italian mental lexicon. In S. Nooteboom, F. Weerman, & F. Wijnen (Eds.), Storage and computation in the language faculty (pp. 75-108). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
62. Scarborough, D.L., Cortese, C., & Scarborough, H.S. (1977). Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 3, 1-17.
63. Skousen, R. (1975). Substantive evidence in phonology. The Hague: Mouton.
64. Skousen, R. (1989). Analogical modeling of language. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
65. Skousen, R. (1992). Analogy and structure. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
66. Skousen, R. (1995). Analogy: A non-rule alternative to neural networks. Rivista di Linguistica, 7, 213-232.
67. Skousen, R. (1998). Natural statistics in language modeling. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 5, 246-255.
68. Stemberger, J.P. (1994). Rule-less morphology at the phonology-lexicon interface. In S.D. Lima, R.L. Corrigan, & G.K. Iverson (Eds.), The reality of linguistic rules (pp. 147-169). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
69. Stemberger, J.P., & MacWhinney, B. (1986). Frequency and the lexical storage of regularly inflected forms. Memory and Cognition, 14, 17-26.
70. Teschner, R.V. (1983). Spanish gender revisited: -Z words as illustrating the need for expanded phonological and morphological analysis. Hispania, 66, 252-256.
71. Teschner, R.V., & Russell, W.M. (1984). The gender patterns of Spanish nouns: An inverse dictionary-based analysis. Hispanic Linguistics, 1, 115-132.
72. Treiman, R., Kessler, B., Knewasser, S., Tincoff, R., & Bowman, M. (2000). English speakers' sensitivity to phonotactic patterns. In M.B. Broe & J.B. Pierrehumbert (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology V: Acquisition and the lexicon (pp. 269-282). Cambridge: Cambridge University.