Addiction and Disability: Moral and Policy Issues

Substance Use and Misuse

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2004, Pages

  Wasserman, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Addiction; Disability; Discrimination; Distributive justice; Impairment

Indexed keywords

ILLICIT DRUG;

ADDICTION; CONCEPT FORMATION; DISABILITY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DRUG DEPENDENCE; ETHICS; HEALTH CARE POLICY; JUSTICE; LEGAL ASPECT; MORALITY; POLICY; POLITICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SOCIAL ASPECT;

EID: 1842511524     PISSN: 10826084     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1081/JA-120029986     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. C.F.R. sec. 1630 (2).
2. ADA Title I, sec 101 (10).
3. ADA Title I, sec. 101 (9).
4. ADA, sec. 3 (2)-Definitions, "disability".
5. ADA, sec. 510-Illegal Use of Drugs.
6. Albrecht, G., Walker, V., Levy, J. (1982). Social distance from the stigmatized: a test of two theories. Social Science and Medicine 16:1319, 1327.
7. Altman, B. R. (2001). Disability definitions, models, classification schemes, and applications. In: Albrecht, G., Seelman, K., Bury, M., eds. Handbook of Disability Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 97-122.
8. Amey, R. Appetite suppressing hormone found. [Bioethics] Community email, 8/7/2002, http://www.egroups.com/community/Bioethics.
9. Amundson, R. (1992). Disability, handicap, and the environment. Journal of Social Philosophy 23(1).
10. Amundson, R. (2000). Against Normal Functions Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 31 (1).
11. Bickenbach, J. (1993). Physical Disability and Social Policy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
12. Bickenbach, J. (2000). The ADA v. the Canadian charter of rights: disability rights and the social model of disability. In: Francis, L., Silvers, R., eds. Americans with Disabilities: Exploring the Implications of the Law for Individuals and Institution. New York: Routledge.
13. Boorse, C. (1975). On the distinction between disease and illness. Philosophy and Public Affiairs 5:49-68.
14. Boorse, C. (1977). Health as a theoretical concept. Philosophy of Science 44(4):542-573.
15. Boorse, C. (1995). Concepts of health. In: VanDeveer, D., Regan, T., eds. Health Care Ethics: An Introduction. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 359-393.
16. Buchanan, A. (1996). Choosing who will be disabled: genetic intervention and the morality of inclusion. Social Philosophy and Policy 13(2).
17. Corrado, M. (2001). Addiction and responsibility. Law and Philosophy (special issues).
18. Dolnick, E. (1993). Deafness as culture. Atlantic Monthly September(37):38.
19. Edwards, G., Anderson, P., Babor, T. F., Casswell, S., Ferrence, R., Giesbrecht, N., Godfrey, C., Holder, H. D., Lemmens, P., Makela, K., Midanik, L. T., Norstrom, T., Osterberg, E., Romesljo, A., Room, R., Simpura, J., Skog, O. (1994). Alcohol Policy and the Public Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Elster, J., Skog, O. (1999). Introduction. In: Elster, J., Skog, O., eds. Getting Hooked: Rationality and Addiction. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21. Engelhardt, H. T. Jr. (1986). The Foundations of Bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
22. Galston, W., Wasserman, D. (1996). Gambling away our moral capital. The Public Interest Spring:58-71.
23. Gardner, E. (1999). The neurobiology and genetics of addiction: implications of the "reward deficiency syndrome" for therapeutic strategies in chemical dependency. In: Elster, D., ed. Addiction Entries and Exits. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 57-119.
24. Hacking, I. (2001). Degeneracy, criminal behavior, and looping. In: Wasserman, D., Wachbroit, R., eds. Genetics and Criminal Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. Hennen, A. (1997). Protecting addicts in the employment arena: charting a course towards tolerance. Law and Inequality 15:157.
26. Kobler, J. (1973). Ardent Spirits: The Rise and Fall of Prohibition. New York: Putnam.
27. Kramer, P. (1993). Listening to Prozac. New York: Viking Press.
28. Leshner, A. (1997). Addiction is a brain disease, and it matters. Science 278:45-47.
29. MacCoun, R., Reuter, J. (2001). Drug War Heresies: Learning from Other Vices, Times, and Places. New York: Cambridge University Press, 385-395.
30. MacCoun, R., Reuter, P. (2002). Cocaine, marijuana, and heroin. The American Prospect 13(10):25-28.
31. Mills, Claudia (2002). In: Gehring, V., Galston, W., eds. One Pill Makes You Smarter: An Ethical Appraisal of the Rise of Ritalin: Philosophical Dimensions of Public Policy. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 257-263, 261.
32. Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Sec. 504; Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA).
33. Vanko, K. (1996). In search of common ground: leveling the playing field for chemically dependant workers under the Americans with disabilities act of 1990. University of Illinois Law Review 1257.
34. Vassel, R. (1994). The Americans with disabilities act: the cost, uncertainty, and inefficiency. Journal of Law and Commerce 13:397.
35. Wachbroit, R. (1998). Health and disease. Concepts of Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics 2:533-538.
36. Wachbroit, R. (1992). Normality as a biological concept. Philosophy of Science 61:579-591.
37. Wasserman, D. (2000). Stigma without impairment: demedicalizing disability discrimination. In: Francis, L., Silvers, A., eds. Americans with Disabilities. New York: Routledge.
38. Watson, G. (2001). Excusing Addiction Law and Philosophy. 589-619.
39. Wikler, D. (1979). Paternalism and the mildly retarded. Philosophy and Public Affairs 8(4):63-87.
40. Williams, G. (2001). Theorizing disability. In: Albrecht, G., Seelman, K., Bury, M., eds. Handbook of Disability Studies. CA: Thousand Oaks, 123-144.
41. Wilson, E.O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42. Yaffe, G. (2002). Recent Work on Addiction and Responsible Agency Philosophy & Public Affairs. 30(2):178-221.