Speech Understanding by Cochlear-Implant Patients with Different Left- and Right-Ear Electrode Arrays

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 191-194

  Dorman, Michael F ^a,b   Dahlstrom, Lisa ^b  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; ELECTRODE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; PITCH; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ADULT; AGED; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; MALE; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 1842507411     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.AUD.0000120367.70123.9A     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Dorman, M. F., Dankowski, K., Smith, L., & McCandless, G. (1989). Identification of synthetic vowels by patients using the Symbion multichannel cochlear implant. Ear and Hearing, 10, 40-43.
2. Fishman, K., Shannon, R. & Slattery, W. (1997). Speech recognition as a function of the number of electrodes used in the SPEAK cochlear implant speech processor. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 40, 1201-1215.
3. Long, C., Eddington, D., Colburn, H., & Rabinowitz, W. (2003). Binaural sensitivity as a function of interaural electrode position with a bilateral cochlear implant user. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114, 1565-1574.
4. Nilsson, M., Soli, S., & Sullivan, J. (1994). Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 1085-1099.
5. Wilson, B. (1997). The future of cochlear implants. British Journal of Audiology, 31, 205-225.
6. Lawson, D., Wolford, R., Brill, S., Schatzer, R., & Wilson, B. Speech Processors for Auditory Prostheses. Twelfth Quarterly Progress Report on NIH Project NO1-DC-8-2105 July 1-September 30, 2001.