Thirty years of the British Journal of Audiology: Guest editorial. The future of cochlear implants

British Journal of Audiology

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 205-225

  Wilson, Blake S ^a  

^a RTI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONSONANT; ELECTRODE; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TELEMETRY; EDITORIAL; EVOKED RESPONSE; FORECASTING; PATIENT SELECTION; PROSTHESIS;

COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; ELECTRODES; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FORECASTING; HUMANS; PATIENT SELECTION; PROSTHESIS FITTING; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 0031204173     PISSN: 03005364     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/03005369709076795     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Abbas PJ, Brown CJ, Dillier N, Lai WK, Heller J. Measures of the electrically evoked whole nerve action potential using the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant, Presented at the Vth International Cochlear Implant Conference, New York, NY, May, 1997.
2. Battmer R-D, Gupta SP, Allum-Mecklenburg D, Lenarz T. Factors influencing cochlear implant perceptual performance in 132 adults. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1995; 104 (Suppl 166): 185-187.
3. Blarney PJ, Arndt P, Bergeron F, Bredberg G, Brimacombe J, Facer G, Larky J, Lindström B, Nedzelski J, Peterson A, Shipp D, Staller S, Whitford L. Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol 1996; 1: 293-306.
4. Blarney PJ, Pyman BC, Gordon M, Clark GM, Brown AM, Dowell RC, Hollow RD. Factors predicting postoperative sentence scores in postlinguistically deaf adult cochlear implant patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1992; 101: 342-348.
5. Brill S, Gstöttner W, Helms J, von Ilberg C, Baumgartner W, Müller J, Kiefer J. Optimization of channel number and stimulation rate for the fast CIS-strategy in the COMBI 40+. Am J Otol, in press.
6. Brill S, Hochmair ES. Speech understanding as a function of the number of active channels and stimulation rate in the CIS strategy as implemented in the Combi 40/Combi 40+. Presented at the Vth International Cochlear Implant Conference, New York, NY, May, 1997.
7. Brown CJ, Abbas PJ, Borland J, Bertschy MR. Electrically evoked whole nerve action potentials in Ineraid cochlear implant users: Responses to different stimulating electrode configurations and comparison to psychophysical responses. J Speech Hear Res 1996; 39: 453-467.
8. Brown CJ, Abbas PJ, Gantz B. Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: Data from human cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 88: 1385-1391.
9. Busby PA, Tong YC, Clark GM. The perception of temporal modulations by cochlear implant patients. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 94: 124-131.
10. Dorman MF, Hannley MT, Dankowski K, Smith L, McCandless G. Word recognition by 50 patients fitted with the Symbion multichannel cochlear implant. Ear Hear 1989; 10: 44-49.
11. Fishman K, Shannon RV, Slattery WH. Speech recognition as a function of the number of electrodes used in the SPEAK cochlear implant speech processor. J Speech Hear Res, in press.
12. Eddington DK, Runbinstein JT, Dynes SBC. Forward masking during intracochlear electrical stimulation: Models, physiology, and psychophysics. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 95: 2904.
13. Flanagan JL. Speech analysis, synthesis and perception. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1972.
14. Gabriel KB, Koehnke J, Colburn HS. Frequency dependence of binaural performance in listeners with impaired binaural hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 91: 336-347.
15. Gantz BJ, Woodworth GG, Abbas PJ, Knutson JF, Tyler RS. Multivariate predictors of audiological success with multichannel cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1993; 102: 909-916.
16. Hartmann R, Topp G, Klinke R. Discharge patterns of cat primary auditory nerve fibers with electrical stimulation of the cochlea. Hear Res 1984; 13: 47-62.
17. Hill FJ, McRae P, McClellan RP. Speech recognition as a function of channel capacity in a discrete set of channels. J Acoust Soc Am 1968; 44: 13-18.
18. Johnson DH, Kiang NYS. Analysis of discharges recorded simultaneously from pairs of auditory nerve fibers. Biophysical J 1976; 16: 719-734.
19. Kiefer J, Pfennigdorff T, Rupprecht V, Huber- Egener J, von Ilberg C. The effect of stimulus rate and channel number on speech understanding with the CIS-strategy in cochlear implant patients. Presented at the Third European Symposium on Paediatric Cochlear Implantation, Hannover, Germany, June, 1996.
20. Kiefer J, von Ilberg C, Rupprecht V, Huber- Egener J, Baumgartner W, Gstöttner W, Stephan K. Optimized speech understanding with the CIS-speech coding strategy in cochlear implants: The effect of variations in stimulus rate and numbers of channels. Presented at the Vth International Cochlear Implant Conference, New York, NY, May, 1997.
21. Kileny PR. Use of electrophysiological measures in the management of children with cochlear implants: Brainstem, middle latency, and cognitive (P300) responses. Am J Otol 1991; 12 (Suppl 1): 37-42.
22. Kileny PR, Zimmerman-Philips S, Kemink JL, Schmaltz SP. Effects of preoperative electrical stimulability and historical factors on performance with multichannel cochlear implant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1991; 100: 563-568.
23. Knutson JF, Hinrichs JV, Tyler RS, Gantz BJ, Schartz HA, Woodworth G. Psychological predictors of audiological outcomes of multichannel cochlear implants: Preliminary findings. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1991; 100: 817-822.
24. Kraus N, McGee T, Carrell TD, Sharma A. Neurophysiologic bases of speech discrimination. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 19-37.
25. Kuzma, JA. Cochlear electrode implant assemblies with positioning system therefor. US patent 5545219, Aug. 13, 1996.
26. Kuzma JA, Seldon HL, Brown GG. Self-curving cochlear electrode array. US patent 5578084, Nov. 26, 1996.
27. Lawson DT, Wilson BS, Finley CC. New processing strategies for multichannel cochlear prostheses. Prog Brain Res 1993; 97: 313-321.
28. Lawson DT, Wilson BS, Zerbi M, Finley CC. Speech processors for auditory prostheses. Third Quarterly Progress Report, NIH project N01-DC-5-2103. Neural Prosthesis Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 1996a.
29. Lawson DT, Wilson BS, Zerbi M, Finley CC. Speech processors for auditory prostheses. Fifth Quarterly Progress Report, NIH project N01-DC-5-2103. Neural Prosthesis Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 1996b.
30. McDermott HJ, McKay CM, Vandali AE. A new portable sound processor for the University of Melbourne/Nucleus Limited multielectrode cochlear implant. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 91: 3367-3391.
31. McDermott HJ, Vandali AE. Spectral maxima sound processor. US patent 5597380, Jan. 28, 1997.
32. Meddis R. Simulation of mechanical to neural transduction in the auditory receptor. J Acoust Soc Am 1986; 79: 702-711.
33. Micco AG, Kraus N, Koch DB, McGee TJ, Carrell TD, Sharma A, Nicol T, Wiet RJ. Speech- evoked cognitive P300 potentials in cochlear implant recipients. Am J Otol 1995; 16: 514-520.
34. Moore BCJ. An introduction to the psychology of hearing 3rd edn. London: Academic Press, 1989.
35. Morse RP, Evans EF. Enhancement of vowel coding for cochlear implants by addition of noise. Nature Med 1996; 2: 928-932.
36. Moss F, Chioutan F, Klinke R. Will there be noise in their ears? Nature Med 1996; 2: 860-862.
37. NIH Consensus Statement. Cochlear implants in adults and children, May 15-17, 1995. (reproduced in JAMA 1995; 274: 1955-1961.)
38. Oppenheim AV, Schafer RW. Digital signal processing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1975.
39. Parkins CW. Temporal response patterns of auditory nerve fibers to electrical stimulation in deafened squirrel monkeys. Hear Res 1989; 41: 137-168.
40. Parnas BR. Noise and neuronal populations conspire to encode simple waveforms reliably. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1996; 43: 313-318.
41. Ponton CW, Don M. The mismatch negativity in cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 131-146.
42. Rabiner LR, Schafer RW. Digital Processing of Speech Signals. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1978.
43. Ranck JB Jr. Which elements are excited in electrical stimulation of the mammalian central nervous system: A review. Brain Res 1975; 98: 417-440.
44. Seldon HL, Daham MC, Clark CM. Silastic with polyacrylic acid filler: Swelling properties, biocompatibility and potential use into cochlear implants. Biomaterials 1994; 15: 1161-1169.
45. Shepherd RK, Hatsushika S, Clark GM. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: The effect of electrode position on neural excitation. Hearing Res 1993; 66: 108-120.
46. Shipp DB, Nedzelski JM. Prognostic indicators of speech recognition performance in adult cochlear implant users: A prospective analysis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1995; 104 (Suppl 166): 194-196.
47. Shiroma M, Honda K, Yamanaka N, Kawano J, Yukawa K, Kumakawa K, Funasaka S. Factors contributing to phoneme recognition ability of users of the 22-channel cochlear implant system. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1992; 101: 32-37.
48. Skinner MW, Clark GM, Whitford LA, Seligman PM, Staller SJ, Shipp DB, Shallop JK, Everingham C, Menapace CM, Arndt PL, Antogenelli T, Brimacombe JA, Pijl S, Daniels P, George CR, McDermott HJ, Beiter AL. Evaluation of a new spectral peak (SPEAK) coding strategy for the Nucleus 22 channel cochlear implant system. Am J Otol 1994a; 15 (Suppl 2): 15-27.
49. Skinner MW, Ketten DR, Vannier MW, Gates GA, Yoffie RL, Kalender WA. Determination of the position of Nucleus cochlear implant electrodes in the inner ear. Am J Otol 1994b; 15: 644-651.
50. Summerfield AQ, Marshall DH. Preoperative predictors of outcomes from cochlear implantation in adults: Performance and quality of life. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1995; 104 (Suppl 166): 105-108.
51. van Hoesel RJM, Clark GM. Fusion and lateralization study with two binaural cochlear implant patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1995; 104 (Suppl 166): 233-235.
52. van Hoesel RJM, Clark GM. Psychophysical studies with two binaural cochlear implant subjects. J Acoust Soc Am, 1997; 102: 495-507.
53. van Hoesel RJM, Tong YC, Hallow RD, Clark GM. Psychophysical and speech perception studies: A case report on a binaural cochlear implant subject. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 94: 3178-3189.
54. Wilson BS, Finley CC, Farmer JC Jr, Lawson DT, Weber BA, Wolford RD, Kenan PD, White MW, Merzenich MM, Schindler RA. Comparative studies of speech processing strategies for cochlear implants. Laryngoscope 1988; 98: 1069-1077.
55. Wilson BS, Finley CC, Lawson DT. Speech processors for auditory prostheses. Seventh Quarterly Progress Report, NIH project N01- NS-3-2356. Neural Prosthesis Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 1985.
56. Wilson BS, Finley CC, Lawson DT, Wolford RD, Eddington DK, Rabinowitz WM. Better speech recognition with cochlear implants. Nature 1991; 352: 236-238.
57. Wilson BS, Finley CC, Lawson DT, Zerbi M. Speech processors for auditory prostheses. Eleventh Quarterly Progress Report, NIH project N01-DC-2-2401. Neural Prosthesis Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 1995a.
58. Wilson BS, Finley CC, Lawson DT, Zerbi M. Temporal representations with cochlear implants. Am J Otol, in press.
59. Wilson BS, Finley CC, Lawson DT, Zerbi M, van den Honert C. High rate coding strategies. Presented at the International Workshop on Cochlear Implants, Vienna, Austria, Oct., 1996.
60. Wilson BS, Finley CC, Zerbi M, Lawson DT. Speech processors for auditory prostheses. Seventh Quarterly Progress Report, NIH project N01-DC-2-2401. Neural Prosthesis Pro- gram, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 1994a.
61. Wilson BS, Finley CC, Zerbi M, Lawson DT. Speech processors for auditory prostheses. Ninth Quarterly Progress Report, NIH project N01-DC-2-2401. Neural Prosthesis Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 1994b.
62. Wilson BS, Lawson DT, Zerbi M. Advances in coding strategies for cochlear implants. Adv Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995b; 9: 105-129.
63. Wilson BS, Lawson DT, Zerbi M, Finley CC, Wolford RD. Recent developments with the CIS strategies. In: Hochmair-Desoyer IJ, Hochmair ES, eds. Advances in cochlear implants. Vienna: Manz Interscience Series, 1994c; 103-112.
64. Wilson BS, Rebscher S, Zeng F-G, Shannon RV, Loeb GE, Lawson DT, Zerbi M. Design for an inexpensive but effective cochlear implant. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, in press.
65. Zeng F-G. Cochlear implants in China. Audiology 1995; 34: 61-75.