Contribution of institutional DSS to organizational performance: Evidence from a longitudinal study

Decision Support Systems

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 103-118

  Kohli, Rajiv ^a   Devaraj, Sarv ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision support system; DSS; Effectiveness; IT payoff; Lag effects; Longitudinal design; Organizational impacts; Organizational performance; Usage

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; HEALTH CARE; INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; INVESTMENTS; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; MANAGERS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

DSS; EFFECTIVENESS; IT PAYOFFS; LAG EFFECTS; LONGITUDNAL DESIGN; ORGANIZATIONAL IMPACTS; ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE; USAGE;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

EID: 1842506394     PISSN: 01679236     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-9236(02)00211-7     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Alavi M., Joachimsthaler E.A. Revisiting DSS implementation research - a metaanalysis of the literature and suggestions for researchers. MIS Quarterly. 16(1):1992;95-116.
2. Anderson E.E., Chen Y.M. A simultaneous equation model of cost performance relationships in large-scale computing. IIE Transactions. 24(5):1992;155-165.
3. Barr S.H., Sharda R. Effectiveness of decision support systems: development or reliance effect? Decision Support Systems. 21(2):1997;133-146.
4. Barua A., Kriebel C.H., Mukhopadhyay T. Information technologies and business value - an analytic and empirical-investigation. Information Systems Research. 6(1):1995;3-23.
5. Belsley D.A., Kuh E., Welsch R.Y. Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity. 1980;Wiley, New York, NY.
6. Benbasat I., Zmud R.W. Empirical research in information systems: the practice of relevance. MIS Quarterly. 23(1):1999;3-16.
7. Benbenishty R., Treistman R. The development and evaluation of a hybrid decision support system for clinical decision making: the case of discharge from the military. Social Work Research. 22(4):1998;195-204.
8. Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L. Beyond the productivity paradox. Communications of the ACM. 41(8):1998;49-55.
9. Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L.M. Beyond the productivity paradox. Communications of the ACM. 41(8):1998;49-55.
10. Cao J.M., Kanafani A. Real-time decision support for integration of airline flight cancellations and delays: 2. Algorithm and computational experiments. Transportation Planning and Technology. 20(3):1997;201-217.
11. Davern M.J., Kauffman R.J. Discovering potential and realizing value from information technology investments. Journal of Management Information Systems. 16(4):2000;121-143.
12. Davis F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly. 13(3):1989, September;319-340.
13. Devaraj S., Kohli R. Information technology payoff in the healthcare industry: a longitudinal study. Journal of Management Information Systems. 16(4):2000;41-67.
14. Dickinson J.C. From process to policy: A generic prescription for test over-utilization in the emergency department. Family Practice Research Journal. 7(1):1987;12-21.
15. Doll W.J., Torkzadeh G. Developing a multidimensional measure of system-use in an organizational context. Information and Management. 33(4):1998;171-185.
16. Downing C.E. System usage behavior as a proxy for user satisfaction. Information and Management. 35:1999;203-216.
17. Eden C. On evaluating the performance of wide-band GDSSs. European Journal of Operational Research. 81(2):1995;302-311.
18. Finlay P.N., Forghani M. A classification of success factors for decision support systems. Journal of Strategic Information Systems. 7(1):1998;53-70.
19. Forgionne G., Kohli R. HMSS: a management support system for concurrent hospital decision-making. Decision Support Systems. 16(3):1996;209-229.
20. Forgionne G.A., Kohli R. Management support systems effectiveness: further empirical evidence. Journal of Association for Information Systems. 1(3):2000;1-39.
21. Gapenski L.C., Vogel W.B., Langland-Orban B. The determinants of hospital profitability. Hospital and Health Services Administration. 38(1):1993;63-80.
22. Gardner C.L., Marsden J.R., Pingry D.E. The design and use of laboratory experiments for DSS evaluation. Decision Support Systems. 9(4):1993;369-379.
23. Garnto C., Watson H.J. An investigation of database requirements for institutional and ad hoc DSS. Data Base. 16(4):1985;3-9.
24. Gelderman M. The relation between user satisfaction, usage of information systems and performance. Information and Management. 34(1):1998;11-18.
25. Ghorab K.E. The impact of technology acceptance considerations on system usage, and adopted level of technological sophistication: an empirical investigation. International Journal of Information Management. 17(4):1997;249-259.
26. Guerlain S.A., Smith P.J., Obradovich J.H., Rudmann S., Strohm P., Smith J.W., Svirbely J., Sachs L. Interactive critiquing as a form of decision support: an empirical evaluation. Human Factors. 41(1):1999;72-89.
27. Guimaraes T., Igbaria M., Lu M.T. The determinants of DSS success - an integrated model. Decision Sciences. 23(2):1992;409-430.
28. Hawk S.R., Bariff M.L. An examination of organizational strategies for supporting DSS. Information and Management. 28(2):1995;77-88.
29. Igbaria M., Sprague R.H., Basnet C., Foulds L. The impact and benefits of a DSS: the case of Fleet Manager. Information and Management. 31(4):1996;215-225.
30. Johnston M.E., Langton K.B., Haynes R.B., Mathieu A. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on clinician performance and patient outcome. A critical appraisal of research. [see comments] Annals of Internal Medicine. 120(2):1994;135-142.
31. Keen P.G.W. Value analysis: justifying decision support systems. MIS Quarterly. 5(1):1981;57-73.
32. Keen P.G.W. Decision support systems: the next decade. Decision Support Systems. 3:1987;253-265.
33. Kelley M.R. Productivity and information technology - the elusive connection. Management Science. 40(11):1994;1406-1425.
34. Kohli R., Tan J.K., Piontek F.A., Ziege D.E., Groot H. Integrating cost information with health management support system: an enhanced methodology to assess health care quality drivers. Top Health Information Management. 20(1):1999;80-95.
35. Koski H. The implications of network use, production network externalities and public networking programmes for firm's productivity. Research Policy. 28(4):1999;423-439.
36. Langland-Orban B., Gapenski L.C., Vogel W.B. Differences in characteristics of hospitals with sustained high and sustained low profitability. Hospital and Health Services Administration. 41(3):1996;385-399.
37. LeBlanc L.A., Kozar K.A. An empirical-investigation of the relationship between DSS usage and system performance - a case-study of a navigation support system. MIS Quarterly. 14(3):1990;263-277.
38. Lucas H.C., Spitler V.K. Technology use and performance: a field study of broker workstations. Decision Sciences. 30(2):1999;291-311.
39. Mahmood M., Mann G.J. How information technology investments affect organizational productivity and performance: a longitudinal study. Proceedings of the 1997 Information Resources Management Association International Conference:1997;187-191.
40. Mahmood M.A., Mann G.J. Special issue: impacts of information technology investment on organizational performance. Journal of Management Information Systems. 16(4):2000;3-10.
41. McKeen J.D., Smith H.A. The relationship between information technology use and organizational performance. Banker R., Kauffman R., Mahmood M.A. Strategic Information Technology Management. 1993;405-445 Ideal Group, Harrisburg, PA.
42. Meador C.L., Guyote M.J., Rosenfeld W.L. Decision support planning and analysis: the problem of getting large-scale DSS started. MIS Quarterly. 10(2):1986;159-177.
43. Mooney J., Gurbaxani V., Kraemer K. A process oriented framework for assessing the business value of information technology. Database Advances in Information Systems. 27(2):1996;68.
44. Mukhopadhyay T., Kekre S., Kalathur S. Business value of information technology - a study of electronic data interchange. MIS Quarterly. 19(2):1995;137-156.
45. Nault B., Benbasat I. An evaluation of empirical research in managerial support systems. Decision Support Systems. 6:1990;203-226.
46. J. Newman, The Role of Idea Processing in Decision Support Systems, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, Unpublished PhD dissertation (1993).
47. Okeefe R.M. The evaluation of decision-aiding systems - guidelines and methods. Information and Management. 17(4):1989;217-226.
48. Papadopoulos H.T. A field service support system using a queuing network model and the priority MVA algorithm. Omega-International Journal of Management Science. 24(2):1996;195-203.
49. Pieptea D.R., Anderson E. Price and value of decision support systems. MIS Quarterly. 11(4):1987;515-528.
50. Rai A., Patnayakuni R., Patnayakuni N. Refocusing where and how IT value is realized: an empirical investigation. Omega-International Journal of Management Science. 24(4):1996;399-412.
51. Rosenstein A.H. Measuring the benefits of clinical decision support: return on investment. Health Care Management Review. 24(2):1999;32-43.
52. Santhanam R., Guimaraes T. Assessing the quality of institutional DSS. European Journal of Information Systems. 4(3):1995;159-170.
53. Sharda R.M., Barr S.H., McDonnell J.C. Decision support system effectiveness: a review and empirical test. Management Science. 34(1):1988;139-159.
54. Shi L. Patient and hospital characteristics associated with average length of stay. Health Care Management Review. 21(2):1996;46-61.
55. Sircar S., Turnbow J., Bordoloi B. The impact of information technology investments on firm performance: a review of literature. Engineering Valuation and Cost Analysis. 1:1998;171-181.
56. Soh C., Markus M. How IT creates business value: a process theory synthesis. Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Information Systems:1995;29-41.
57. Straub D., Limayem M., Karahanna-Evaristo E. Measuring system usage - implications for IS theory testing. Management Science. 41(8):1995;1328-1342.
58. Tavana M., Chung Q.B., Kennedy D.T. Rho: a decision support system for pricing in law firms. Information and Management. 33(3):1998;155-165.
59. Teng J.T.C., Calhoun K.J. Organizational computing as a facilitator of operational and managerial decision making: an exploratory study of managers' perceptions. Decision Sciences. 27(4):1996;673-710.
60. Teplensky J.D., Pauly M.V., Kimberly J.R., Hillman A.L., Schwartz J.S. Hospital adoption of medical technology: an empirical test of alternative models. Health Services Research. 30(3):1995;437-465.
61. Toraskar K.V., Joglekar P.N. Price and value of decision support systems - comments. MIS Quarterly. 14(1):1990;7-12.
62. Udo G. Rethinking the effectiveness measures of decision support systems. Information and Management. 22(2):1992;123-135.
63. Udo G.J., Davis J.S. Factors affecting decision support system benefits. Information and Management. 23(6):1992;359-371.
64. Wachtel T.J., O'Sullivan P. Practice guidelines to reduce testing in the hospital. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 5(4):1990;335-341.
65. Weill P. The relationship between investment in information technology and firm performance: a study of the valve manufacturing sector. Information Systems Research. 3(4):1992;307-333.
66. Weill P., Vitale M. Assessing the health of an information systems applications portfolio: an example from process manufacturing. MIS Quarterly. 23(4):1999;601-624.
67. Wood V.R., Bhuian S., Kiecker P. Market orientation and organizational performance in not-for-profit hospitals. Journal of Business Research. 48:2000;213-226.
68. Xiaobo Z., Zhou Z. Algorithms for Toyota's goal of sequencing mixed models on an assembly line with multiple workstations. Journal of the Operational Research Society. 50(7):1999;704-710.